• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.
Cuddles,

Oh, Christ! Please don't tell me that I typo'ed Peephole's handle as "Peehole" or something similar (the post has been amended so I don't know what the offensive material was). I swear that if that is what the breach of Rule 12 was about it was a typo, unintentional, stupid on my part for not looking closely before posting and I profusely apologize. Gads. I even do my long posts in MS Word and copy/paste after looking them over first. Damn!

I am a Mod and Site Admin on another site, I have a reputation to uphold and I swear on my honor that I would never knowlingly do that.

Darby

It was "Peehole." I pondered pointing your attention to it when I read it, figuring that it was a typo, but ultimately decided not to, thinking that the post wouldn't really add anything of note to the thread.
 
Heterosex and pregnancy creates life; homosexuality and AIDs brings [sic] death.

Except when heterosex and pregnancy causes death, and when homosexuality doesn't.

As long as you ignore all of those cases, then what you say is true. :rolleyes:

And why do you lump AIDS with homosexuality? One could say all fatal diseases bring death. But AIDS is caused by a virus, and that virus can infect and sicken and kill anyone, not just homosexuals. (And if you believe AIDS is somehow caused by homosexuality, you're just plain wrong. Not as a matter of opinion or interpretation, but wrong as a matter of well-established fact.)

ETA: Heterosex and ebola bring death. Heterosex and influenza bring death. Heterosex and Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease bring death.
 
Last edited:
For that matter, is it reasonable to praise the characteristic of "heterosex" to "create life"?

Gay couples can certainly adopt children. Given that world population is about 7 billion, isn't the ability and willingness to take care of the living something we should consider more noble and more deserving of encouragement?

Or is the ability to have sex and reproduce more important?
 
For that matter, is it reasonable to praise the characteristic of "heterosex" to "create life"?

Gay couples can certainly adopt children. Given that world population is about 7 billion, isn't the ability and willingness to take care of the living something we should consider more noble and more deserving of encouragement?
:) Yes.
 
Yes. And AIDs can be especially damaging to their health, and well as other STDs and diseases.

Lesbians are less likely than gay men or heterosexuals in getting or passing on the AIDS virus. I have always found this to be rather puzzling in light of the "God's wrath" explaination of AIDS that is often put forward by religious folk.

Perhaps you could offer an explaination?

-z
 
Lesbians are less likely than gay men or heterosexuals in getting or passing on the AIDS virus. I have always found this to be rather puzzling in light of the "God's wrath" explaination of AIDS that is often put forward by religious folk.

Perhaps you could offer an explaination?

-z

God thinks lesbians are hawt?
 
Lesbians are less likely than gay men or heterosexuals in getting or passing on the AIDS virus. I have always found this to be rather puzzling in light of the "God's wrath" explaination of AIDS that is often put forward by religious folk.

Perhaps you could offer an explaination?
-z

Lesbians, not being generally known for pregnancy and child bearing or breast feeding, make themselves much more at risk for other deadly diseases such as breast and ovarian cancers.
 
Except when heterosex and pregnancy causes death, and when homosexuality doesn't.

As long as you ignore all of those cases, then what you say is true. :rolleyes:

And why do you lump AIDS with homosexuality? One could say all fatal diseases bring death. But AIDS is caused by a virus, and that virus can infect and sicken and kill anyone, not just homosexuals. (And if you believe AIDS is somehow caused by homosexuality, you're just plain wrong. Not as a matter of opinion or interpretation, but wrong as a matter of well-established fact.)
.

Baloney.
 

Back
Top Bottom