JoeTheJuggler
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2006
- Messages
- 27,766
Let me answer that last one by referring to my recent re-viewing of the film, 'Judgement at Nurmemburg" I believe is the title with Spencer Tracy as Chief Judge and the attorney for the Nazi judges brilliantly played by Maxaimillion Shell. One of the strongest points he made for the rationale of the behavior of Judges sentencing some people to forced sterilization was (and I am paraphrasing) "The Judiciary does not Make Law! The role of the Judiciary is to enforce law!!"
And you, sir, should be right at home with that logic whether it concerns a law regarding forced sterilization, a law regarding a re-definition of marriage, or a law which states that the constitutional provision as to "no Thing but Gold and Silver Coin be made a tender" can mean paper or anything else the government so chooses.
That being the case, I'm sure, you as well would have been right at home and in the same corner of the judge on trial, Ernst Janning, played by Burt Lancaster. A good movie for all Deep Thinking Thinkers to view and ponder, especially American lawyers and judges who have chosen to check thieir brains and their consciences at the court room door.
A lot of words, none of which answered the question I put to you. But that's no surprise since you kept ducking that same question on the other thread.
I'll ask it again, are there cases in controversy at law that the judiciary lacks the authority to settle?
Please, let's not derail with discussions of your ludicrous theories about the monetary authority.