To me he's still the man behind Casey and Andy.....The book is by Andy Weir (The Martian), and does not disappoint. If audiobooks are your thing, Project Hail Mary is narrated by Ray Porter, one of the masters of the art.
Be interesting how they market this movie, the Martian was quite easy "castaway on Mars", this one not so easy.
But that too has been done.Be interesting how they market this movie, the Martian was quite easy "castaway on Mars"
It's certainly different, but it doesn't venture too far outside standard first-contact and save-the-world tropes. Technology disparity, language, mistaken intentions, existential threat, new alliances, etc. Project Hail Mary doesn't break a whole lot of new thematic ground. But it breaks it in a way that Andy Weir is demonstrably good at. As others have pointed out there are some nonlinear plot elements, and it doesn't look like they're going to opt for the Unreliable Narrator trope from the book. But we'll see. There are many ways to tell an engaging backstory. And others have pointed out pacing issues. That's always easy to fix in an adaptation from a book, which has to condense the source material generally at a 2:1 or 3:1 ratio....this one not so easy.
Yes, but those plot points are big reveals in the book. How much do they want to reveal to audiences before they go into the film?But that too has been done.
![]()
Robinson Crusoe on Mars - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
It's certainly different, but it doesn't venture too far outside standard first-contact and save-the-world tropes. Technology disparity, language, mistaken intentions, existential threat, new alliances, etc. Project Hail Mary doesn't break a whole lot of new thematic ground. But it breaks it in a way that Andy Weir is demonstrably good at. As others have pointed out there are some nonlinear plot elements, and it doesn't look like they're going to opt for the Unreliable Narrator trope from the book. But we'll see. There are many ways to tell an engaging backstory. And others have pointed out pacing issues. That's always easy to fix in an adaptation from a book, which has to condense the source material generally at a 2:1 or 3:1 ratio.
The book is a "building bridges" story, and double the number of "castaways". ;-)Yes, but those plot points are big reveals in the book. How much do they want to reveal to audiences before they go into the film?
You want it to have been filmed on location?Easier than doing North Africa and calling it Mars.
Where did I even imply that?You want it to have been filmed on location?
When you implied that filming a film set on Mars in North Africa was somehow inferior.Where did I even imply that?
I’ve not read the book, so was not aware of the story.I didn't. It moved a bit slowly, and had too much of a deus ex machina 'ending'. I think a film may be better than the book as it will have to have a faster pace. It also felt a bit like a mash up of two stories, a first contact novel and a saving the world from a cataclysm novel.
I can't guarantee you'll like it, obviously, but I thought the book was excellent and recommend it if you're interested in hard science fiction.I’ve not read the book, so was not aware of the story.
From the trailers I’ve seen so far? Don’t think I’ll bother with the movie. It looks cheesy.
I hope for you fans, I’m wrong.
We listened to the audiobook. My wife has no patience for slow stories and she enjoyed the book.I loved the book as well. I thought it did a great job of deliberately unfolding the story very slowly. To me it didn’t drag, but rather made me intrigued.
I read the book and it is OK but it ain't hard science fiction!I can't guarantee you'll like it, obviously, but I thought the book was excellent and recommend it if you're interested
in hard science fiction.
Your impression of my post is noted. I found North Africa fascinating. "Post-apocalytic" came to mind repeatedly.When you implied that filming a film set on Mars in North Africa was somehow inferior.