Problems With Magnetic Reconnection

So re-connecting currents layers.

No such thing. Reconnection is a fact. Get over it. We've been doing it in the lab for ~ 30 years. Nobody is questioning it. I do not include unqualified followers of mythology-based cults.
 
Meanwhile, recent observational studies show that CSs are intensively produced (i) in the turbulent region downstream of shocks, (ii) in corotating/stream interaction regions (CIRs/SIRs), and (ii) in magnetic cavities formed either by the HCS and an approaching high-speed stream/flow or by interact-ing SIRs and interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs).

Such CSs are associated with so-called magnetic islands that represent 2-D sections of 3-D plasmoids/blobs/flux ropes originating from magnetic re-connection considerably intensified in turbulent plasmas and magnetic cavities compressed from at least one side (Khabarova et al. 2015, 2016; Khabarova & Zank, 2017; Adhikari et al. 2019; Malandraki et al. 2019).

Figure 1a-c shows typical situations in which mag-netic cavities filled with CSs and magnetic islands can be formed, and Figure 1a-c illustrates distortion of the HCS that leads to confinement of CSs and magnetic islands.

You need to slow the duck down and have a re read^^

You may also like to take special note of...

magnetic cavities formed either by the HCS and an approaching high-speed stream/flow or by interact-ing SIRs and interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs)

Something magnetic cavities at comets?
 
You need to slow the duck down and have a re read^^

You may also like to take special note of...

magnetic cavities formed either by the HCS and an approaching high-speed stream/flow or by interact-ing SIRs and interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs)

Something magnetic cavities at comets?

Once again proving that either you cannot read, or do not understand what you are reading. Quelle surprise. It is not difficult to see why you fell for the non-science promoted by unqualified mythologists! An 'anti-science cult', as Peratt called it.
 
And as usual you are completely wrong with your insistence of the one-solution "plasma physics". (with pp in parenthesis because you don't do pp, you just do buzzwords).
Creating a plasmoid is A possibility from MRX, it is not THE result, as you can clearly see from all the papers on reconnection in e.g. the Earth's magnetotail.

Current sheets in space plasmas are created by magnetic fields, not the other way around.

Magnetic fields have a tension:
http://latex.codecogs.com/gif.latex? {\bf T}_m = \frac{({\bf B} \cdot \nabla) {\bf B}}{\mu_0},

and magnetic fields have an energy:
http://latex.codecogs.com/gif.latex?E_m = \frac{B^2}{2 \mu_0}

Through the magnetic tension, the magnetic energy is converted to particle energy (acceleration).

So-called exploding double layers only make sense at the location where Alfvén, sort-of, observed them, and that was at the power brakers at a electric power station. When the connection is cut, there is a discharge through the air (like lightning) and there one can have the creation of a double layer and there is an "explosive"-like ending to the discharge, when the gap gets too larged.


Current sheets in space plasmas are created by magnetic fields, not the other way around.??

Cart before the horse there champ.

Sympathetic Partial Filament Eruptions Caused by the Interaction between Two Nearby Filaments Citation Liping Yang et al 2023 ApJ 943 62


Abstract

To better understand the physical connections in sympathetic solar eruptions, we investigated the interaction between two nearby filaments and their successive partial eruptions in the active region (AR) NOAA 12866 on 2021 September 9 by using data from the Solar Dynamics Observatory and the New Vacuum Solar Telescope.

Based on Hα and extreme ultraviolet observations, we found that the right part of one filament (F1) became active first and experienced an obvious rolling motion. Then the whole body of the filament became wider and expanded toward another filament (F2). They collided with each other, and the interaction between them was accompanied by the brightening and bidirectional flows that appeared between them.

This implies that magnetic reconnection occurred between the threads of two filaments. The interaction resulted in a rightward motion of F2 at first, and then its activation, and finally part of it erupted. Furthermore, when the erupted F2 deflected rapidly toward the middle part of F1, the left part of F1 erupted with its overlying magnetic fields pushed by F2.

These observational results imply that these successive eruptions within a short time are physically linked, and this was caused by the interaction of the filaments. Nonlinear force-free field extrapolation reveals that the magnetic structure of the filament F1 was composed of several magnetic flux ropes with different twists. These results further advance our understanding of partial filament eruptions and sympathetic solar eruptions.

Consequently, we conclude that the eruption of filaments involved in our study is likely to be sympathetic partial failed eruptions. Besides, the results from the NLFFF extrapolation demonstrated that both F1 and F2 have twisted magnetic structures, which are consistent with the observations that they manifested noticeable untwisting motions during their eruption processes.

So....ELECTRIC CURRENTS as per Don Scott's paper.

:D
 
Current sheets in space plasmas are created by magnetic fields, not the other way around.??

Cart before the horse there champ.

What exactly do you mean by this? Do you claim that magnetic fields don't generate currents?


I realize that you do not read the papers you link to, but that is really a pity, because if you had made even a cursory read-through of the paper linked above, you could not fail to notice that it is all about magnet fields.
:rolleyes: :boggled: :rolleyes:

Hans
 
Current sheets in space plasmas are created by magnetic fields, not the other way around.??

Cart before the horse there champ.

Sympathetic Partial Filament Eruptions Caused by the Interaction between Two Nearby Filaments Citation Liping Yang et al 2023 ApJ 943 62

So....ELECTRIC CURRENTS as per Don Scott's paper.

:D

And again you quote from a paper that has nothing to do with the claim I made.
If you would go all the way back, you would find a description of how the currents are generated in the filaments .... by shear motion of the footpoints and possible rotation, again, magnetic field driving the current (tube in this case and not a sheet).
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom