• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Presidential Debates

Stacko said:
Best case scenario for him now is Flowers doesn't show up, Conway lies by saying she was never invited & blames media and gets Donald to insist he just want to talk jobs at the debate.
Click to expand...

Fox is reporting Flowers is not attending now. Commence damage control by Conway.
 
Stacko said:
Fox is reporting Flowers is not attending now. Commence damage control by Conway.
Click to expand...

http://www.nationalmemo.com/hunting-the-clintons-the-true-story-behind-gennifer-flowers-500k-payday/

No wonder she does not want to attend now.

I had forgotten the details about this woman, but the entire story is
written here.

Her "twelve year affair" is a figment of her imagination.

Bill Clinton admitted to sexual contact with her in 1977.

A subsequent, sexually explicit Penthouse article (accompanied by a nude photo layout, for which Flowers was paid an additional $250,000, pushing her total scandal earnings over $500,000) made Brummett’s portrait appear relatively kind. Flowers boasted of the many married men she’d seduced for fun and profit. “I usually throw them back. I don’t want to keep them. Let the wives have them back.” Her ex-roommate Lauren Kirk told the article’s author, CNN correspondent Art Harris, that she believed Flowers had lied for revenge and money. “She just can’t accept the fact that he [Clinton] came, wiped himself off, zipped up, and left.”
Click to expand...


In Little Rock, much sport was made of her claim that they had enjoyed numerous trysts between 1978 and 1980 at Little Rock’s Excelsior Hotel. At the time, most observers found it highly improbable that the governor would have conducted an illicit assignation in a landmark downtown hotel two blocks from the state’s largest newspaper. Particularly in view of the fact that the Excelsior Hotel hadn’t been built until 1983
Click to expand...

Unfortunately, it seems that Gennifer Flowers, at 66 years of age has not
gained the wisdom or grace to stop spinning tales and lies for money.

The cynical side of me tells me she had never planned on attending the
debates, Trump's threat of bringing her was just another opportunity to
get eyes on her book.
 
It would be a refreshing change if the debates were to introduce actual issues to the national conversation. Given this run up, however, I expect more useless and unproductive interpersonal bull crap from Trump.
 
cullennz said:
Wonder if Trump will do a Bush and wear an ear piece
Click to expand...

Why would that help in any way? It would just be three debate advisors in a back room with a microphone yelling, "shut up, shut up, shut up!"
 
Ladewig said:
Why would that help in any way? It would just be three debate advisors in a back room with a microphone yelling, "shut up, shut up, shut up!"
Click to expand...

LOL! That's what Carville was yelling when HRC said she would DESTROY the coal industry, at the primary debate!:D
 
Ladewig said:
Why would that help in any way? It would just be three debate advisors in a back room with a microphone yelling, "shut up, shut up, shut up!"
Click to expand...

Well, one way they could help is, when Hillary collapses in the middle of the debate from dehydration or Parkinson's or whatever, they could tell Trump to shout "Quick, call a doctor!" rather than "I told you she was in poor health." The former would look caring and empathetic; the latter would look kind of smarmy. Just my opinion. I understand reasonable people might disagree.
 
sunmaster14 said:
Well, one way they could help is, when Hillary collapses in the middle of the debate from dehydration or Parkinson's or whatever, they could tell Trump to shout "Quick, call a doctor!" rather than "I told you she was in poor health." The former would look caring and empathetic; the latter would look kind of smarmy. Just my opinion. I understand reasonable people might disagree.
Click to expand...

Oh, my, that is clever.

If the best reason to vote for Trump is that his main opponent suffers from imaginary illnesses, it doesn't quite bode well for your candidate, does it?
 
snoop_doxie said:
...
The cynical side of me tells me she had never planned on attending the
debates, Trump's threat of bringing her was just another opportunity to
get eyes on her book.
Click to expand...
The way I heard the story, Mark Cuban started it by Tweeting he'd be in the front row and The Donald took the bait, replying with the Flowers threat. Trump looks the fool here, clearly.
 
sunmaster14 said:
Well, one way they could help is, when Hillary collapses in the middle of the debate from dehydration or Parkinson's or whatever, they could tell Trump to shout "Quick, call a doctor!" rather than "I told you she was in poor health."
Click to expand...

I swear that at this point, if he just walked over and kicked her, a large number of his followers would cheer.
 
phiwum said:
Oh, my, that is clever.

If the best reason to vote for Trump is that his main opponent suffers from imaginary illnesses, it doesn't quite bode well for your candidate, does it?
Click to expand...

Well that was less than clever! Commenting on the worst candidate, next to the worst ever! Barely treading water ! LOL!
Thanks for the laugh!


Scary, but funny post!

Damn the Democrat Party!
 
Dog Town said:
Well that was less than clever! Commenting on the worst candidate, next to the worst ever! Barely treading water ! LOL!
Thanks for the laugh!


Scary, but funny post!

Damn the Democrat Party!
Click to expand...
Not sure I get your point. I guess you're saying that Hillary is the second worst possible candidate. I don't agree, but no matter. I'll happily vote for second worst, given that I think the worst is seriously dangerous.
 
Minoosh said:
I wish Craig Ferguson would moderate a debate.
Click to expand...

I don't know if you're joking, but I think he'd be great. His interviews with authors often demonstrated insight and sensitivity that a lot of talking heads don't show, and he won a Peabody journalism award for his interview with Bishop Tutu. And I can imagine him screaming "That's BS!" to just about anybody.
 
Bob001 said:
I don't know if you're joking, but I think he'd be great. His interviews with authors often demonstrated insight and sensitivity that a lot of talking heads don't show, and he won a Peabody journalism award for his interview with Bishop Tutu. And I can imagine him screaming "That's BS!" to just about anybody.
Click to expand...

I could also see him saying, "I became an American less than a decade ago and had to pass a citizenship test. I am now going to ask you a few questions from that test." That, of course would not in with the format of the first debate, but I would like to see. gEneral Q&A from a panel.

One of the questions is "there are four amendements about who can vote. Describe any one of them?" [note: A word-for-word quoting is not required. One needn't even know the numbers or the years associated with each] Personally, I think a presidential candidate should be able to name at least three. I would be amazed to the point of being nonplussed if Trump could name three.

https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default...ip Resource Center Site/Publications/100q.pdf
 
Last edited:
Ladewig said:
I could also see him saying, "I became an American less than a decade ago and had to pass a citizenship test. I am now going to ask you a few questions from that test." That, of course would not in with the format of the first debate, but I would like to see. gEneral Q&A from a panel.

One of the questions is "there are four amendements about who can vote. Describe any one of them?" [note: A word-for-word quoting is not required. One needn't even know the numbers or the years associated with each] Personally, I think a presidential candidate should be able to name at least three. I would be amazed to the point of being nonplussed if Trump could name three.

https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default...ip Resource Center Site/Publications/100q.pdf
Click to expand...
Without looking, I'm going to say
allowing the vote for blacks, for women, and during the Vietnam war era, lowering the voting age from 21 to 18. The fourth I'd say had something to do with outlawing the poll tax.


I'll keep my embarrassment smiley handy just in case I'm wrong on either of the last two. :blush:

I was right. :D
 
Last edited:
I want to see Hillary push DT's buttons enough for DT to lose all control of his temper. The nation needs to see that Trump cannot handle the pressure of not being the one with all the power.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom