Predict Trump's first revenge prosecutions!

arthwollipot said:
I heard it described as a "cat toy".
Click to expand...
...and therefore not especially dangerous. However the statute (18 U.S.C. § 39A) doesn't include any specification of power or luminous intensity that would distinguish weak lasers from dangerous ones. However, the definition does require that the light be produced by the traditional laser process (to distinguish from, say, flashlights). If the "cat toy" is just a glorified flashlight and doesn't actually use the laser principle, then that would be one reason to acquit.
 
JayUtah said:
I'm not as excited about that one. In general, don't shine lasers at aircraft. It can be incredibly dangerous. I'm guessing this was a low-powered laser pointer and Pirro just overreacted as usual.
Click to expand...
Oh I agree, shining lazers at aircraft is a dangerous thing. (I am not sure the type of "cat toy" the guy had posed any real threat but still not a good idea.)

But I think it is significant that the Trump bootlickers cannot even prosecute something that SHOULD at least in theory be a crime.
 
JayUtah said:
I'm not as excited about that one. In general, don't shine lasers at aircraft. It can be incredibly dangerous. I'm guessing this was a low-powered laser pointer and Pirro just overreacted as usual.
Click to expand...
I was wondering about that too. Did he actually do that or was the prosecution just there to make up the numbers?
 
JayUtah said:
I'm not as excited about that one. In general, don't shine lasers at aircraft. It can be incredibly dangerous. I'm guessing this was a low-powered laser pointer and Pirro just overreacted as usual.
Click to expand...
Jacob Samuel Winkler, 33 years old, is clearly not the terrorist mastermind Jeanine Pirro wanted him to be. He was shirtless in Washington DC, shouting loudly to himself, apparently homeless. When a uniformed Secret Service officer pointed a flashlight at him, he retaliated by pointing a cat toy he had found in the direction of the officer. The Marine One helicopter was flying nearby, with President Trump aboard, so Winkler was charged with pointing a laser at an aircraft.

The jury acquitted him after 35 minutes of deliberation. The presiding Judge was Beryl Howell.
 
Last edited:
W.D.Clinger said:
Jacob Samuel Winkler, 33 years old, is clearly not the terrorist mastermind Jeanine Pirro wanted him to be. He was shirtless in Washington DC, shouting loudly to himself, apparently homeless. When a uniformed Secret Service officer pointed a flashlight at him, he retaliated by pointing a cat toy he had found in the direction of the officer. The Marine One helicopter was flying nearby, with President Trump aboard, so Winkler was charged with pointing a laser at an aircraft.
Click to expand...
"...citizens who take it upon themselves to do unusual actions which attract the attention of the police should be careful to bring these actions into one of the recognized categories of crimes and offences, for it is intolerable that the police should be put to the pains of inventing reasons for finding them undesirable." - Light LCJ in R v Haddock, (1935) Herbert's Uncommon Law 24
 
Last edited:
W.D.Clinger said:
Jacob Samuel Winkler, 33 years old, is clearly not the terrorist mastermind Jeanine Pirro wanted him to be. He was shirtless in Washington DC, shouting loudly to himself, apparently homeless. When a uniformed Secret Service officer pointed a flashlight at him, he retaliated by pointing a cat toy he had found in the direction of the officer. The Marine One helicopter was flying nearby, with President Trump aboard, so Winkler was charged with pointing a laser at an aircraft.

The jury acquitted him after 35 minutes of deliberation. The presiding Judge was Beryl Howell.
Click to expand...
While on the one hand there is a special hell set aside for jackasses who point lasers at aircraft, on the other hand for ◊◊◊◊'s sake.
 
Jack by the hedge said:
While on the one hand there is a special hell set aside for jackasses who point lasers at aircraft, on the other hand for ◊◊◊◊'s sake.
Click to expand...
As a former pilot, I agree with the laser part. However, I also think there's a special hell for prosecutors who bring charges frivolously or maliciously.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom