• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Pope Leo XIV

Orphia Nay

Penguilicious Spodmaster
Tagger
Joined
May 2, 2005
Messages
54,236
Location
Australia
New pope, new pope thread, same old Catholic Church.

"Pope Leo XIV (born Robert Francis Prevost; September 14, 1955) is the bishop of Rome, head of the Catholic Church and sovereign of the Vatican City State. He was elected pope in the 2025 papal conclave on May 8, following the death and funeral of Pope Francis."



In his first address, he said "he was "deeply hurt" by events in Gaza, expressed hope for a "lasting accord" between India and Pakistan, and wished for a "authentic, true and lasting peace" in Ukraine."



"Pope Leo has just finished his news conference in Vatican City, during which he emphasised the importance of careful communication "in favour of peace"."



Nothing on the Catholic Church abuse scandals, but then, he's preaching to the converted who don't want to hear about that.
 
Wasn't it Stalin who asked, "How many troops has the Pope?"
I think it was "how many divisions"

trouble in the Catholic Church: an extreme catholic group wants to ordain its own Bishops without the Vatican.


Splitters !
Oops. There's another division right there.
 
Maybe I'm misremembering, but hasn't this happened before?

Yes, yes it has, under John Paul II:


Tensions between the Society and the Holy See climaxed in 1988 with the Écône consecrations: Archbishop Lefebvre consecrated four bishops without the Apostolic Mandate and against a personal warning by Pope John Paul II,[11] resulting in the Vatican declaration that the bishops who consecrated or were consecrated had incurred latæ sententiæ (automatic) excommunication.[12] However, the SSPX denied that the bishops incurred any penalty, and argued that the consecrations were permissible under canon law due to a moral and theological crisis in the Catholic Church. The declared excommunication of the surviving bishops was removed at their request, in the hope of speedily reaching "full reconciliation and complete communion" (2009).
And who was Pope in 2009? Benedict. I remember that the reconciliation with this group was part of his legacy. So all of this has happened before. They were excommunicated by the Pope himself, and their response was "no we aren't." Eventually the excommunication was reversed by Benedict. So maybe they believe that they just have to wait for another conservative Pope and everything will be back to normal again.
 
Well, they went ahead and did it:


At the start of the Mass, a priest read aloud a statement justifying the consecrations as a necessary “sacred duty” and dismissing the resulting penalties. “We consider every punishment and censure brought to bear against this step will have no validity,” he said.

In the consecration rite, Bishop Alfonso de Galarreta, who himself was excommunicated after being consecrated without papal consent in 1988, placed his hands on the head of each of the four new bishops. The ritual confers the Holy Spirit from one bishop to another and recalls Christ’s gesture to his apostles. After they received their miter hats, gloves and pastoral staffs, the four made a procession through the crowd, blessing the faithful as bishops.

According to church law, consecrating a bishop without a papal mandate incurs the harshest penalty in the Catholic Church: automatic excommunication for the four new bishops and the bishop administering the rite. It also amounts to a schismatic act, an intentional rupture of church unity.

Outside the senior Roman Catholic clergy, who else could not care less?
I don't particularly care other than for some mild amusement at the contradictions and petty infighting. It's a church based on top-down authoritarian rule, and here you have "traditionalists" defying church authority in the name of "We're more Catholic than the Pope!" or something. :popcorn1
 
Me said:
Outside the senior Roman Catholic clergy, who else could not care less?
I don't particularly care other than for some mild amusement at the contradictions and petty infighting. It's a church based on top-down authoritarian rule, and here you have "traditionalists" defying church authority in the name of "We're more Catholic than the Pope!" or something. :popcorn1
It's like World Cup Poping.
 
Well, they went ahead and did it:





I don't particularly care other than for some mild amusement at the contradictions and petty infighting. It's a church based on top-down authoritarian rule, and here you have "traditionalists" defying church authority in the name of "We're more Catholic than the Pope!" or something. :popcorn1
Aren't popes supposed to be holy? Or are there degrees of holiness? Are they going to call themselves the Holier Catholic Church?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom