Plume in Flight 93 photo is different

Is the plume in this photo from Flight 93 crashing?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 129 90.8%
  • No.

    Votes: 13 9.2%

  • Total voters
    142
Status
Not open for further replies.
So, Killtown. So flush with money that $100 doesn't seem worth having, or simply scared? :scared: :scared: :scared: :scared: :scared: :scared: :scared: :scared: :scared: :scared: :scared: :scared: :scared: :scared: :scared: :scared: :scared: :scared: :scared:
 
Last edited:
Why do you recommend that. Provide your logic and reasoning along with your rebuttal to the logic reasoning you are recommending against.
Since your plumes had to shrink because of Gravy's good fuel find, that means your photo times will have to....well, you get the "picture"!
 
Since your plumes had to shrink because of Gravy's good fuel find, that means your photo times will have to....well, you get the "picture"!

A: plume size barely changes as a result of the new fuel data. They barely change even from the "maximum" figure of 10,000gallons.

B: we don't know anything at all about the photo time. The photo time is an unconstrained variable. You can't calculate it into your equations--at best you might derive a probable photo time from the calculations.

C: So I take it you're too :scared: to have a go at a quick'n'easy $100, then?
 
Oooooooooook, whatever you say.

Prove me wrong. ETA: you might want to look at post #1966 to begin with. I know it's more than two lines long and has some math in it, but just have a look.

:scared:
 
Last edited:
This is great, I'm back on ignore!! Guy can't answer a simple question and he ignorss me. Guy can't answer a complex question either, hense Gravy's back on ignore too.
 
:big:
Since your plumes had to shrink because of Gravy's good fuel find, that means your photo times will have to....well, you get the "picture"!

You are indeed less educated than a yellow-handled screwdriver...
Volume of a sphere=4/3*pi*r^3
50% reduction in volume =25% reduction in radius
reduction in mass= little reduction in energy, since energy =1/2 *M*v^2, and v (velocity) is still 51480 ft/sec (so energy is still 5315 ft-lb, or 7173J per piund of airplane weight)
lower volume+ large energy=more aerosol=larger fireball, probably
 
Last edited:
well, then I suggest you ask one of your OCT buddies.
I realize it was sheer folly on my part to think you would have the ability to do any analysis beyond looking at pictures and guessing, but things slowed down here and I took a shot.

Thanks for living down to my expectations.
 
Killtown, the $100 offer is of limited duration (after all, give you enough time and someone on this forum might actually come up with something interesting which you could then steal and repeat). If you think you have evidence, I give you 30 minutes from the appearance of this post to put it up. If that evidence is up in 30 minutes and is substantive, I give you my word that I will send you the $100, in whatever manner you feel comfortable with (PO Box is fine--donated to a charity of your choice in your name is fine). If it isn't, then we'll all know you're :scared: and that you've got nuthin'.
 
Killtown, the $100 offer is of limited duration (after all, give you enough time and someone on this forum might actually come up with something interesting which you could then steal and repeat). If you think you have evidence, I give you 30 minutes from the appearance of this post to put it up. If that evidence is up in 30 minutes and is substantive, I give you my word that I will send you the $100, in whatever manner you feel comfortable with (PO Box is fine--donated to a charity of your choice in your name is fine). If it isn't, then we'll all know you're :scared: and that you've got nuthin'.
give it to charity.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom