Er, no. You seem to be ignoring the fact you can't "explain" your creation date any better than any religious oriented creationist without resorting to invisible friends. Why is that?
Stick to things you have a clue about, like.... uh.... errrr.... hmm.
You know how long inflation lasted, right MM? At most around 10
-27 seconds. That's right: without inflation, the universe would be 13.7 billion years less 10
-27 seconds old, instead of 13.7 billion years old.
As for dark matter and dark energy, if we lived in a different universe - one without DM and DE - the age of that other universe might be different than ours. It might be full of faeries, too and in it you might be right about something, once! (OK, OK, I know that's getting a little crazy, but anything's possible, right?)
But in our universe, the age of the universe is about 13.7 billion years. Can we "explain" that age? Nope. Can't explain the mass of the electron either, or of the proton, or the value of the fine structure constant, or the QCD scale, etc. etc. There are around 25-30 numbers we can't explain and have to measure. But once we've measured them, we can explain just about every one of the literally trillions of scientific observations ever made in history of physical science.
Most people think that's not bad - in fact really worth doing, since it lets us build nice things like that computer you're using and that car you used to drive around (before they took your license away for DWMM). Unlike you, the rest of us don't close our eyes, make little fists, kick scream and throw temper tantrums every time something we didn't expect comes along. Instead, we study it, and learn from it, and after a while we can build even more useful things.