Ahhhhh!
At least one of you is semi honest.
So:
Is your point that since the generator trailer was hit that this would change the trajectory of the craft before impact?
Physical evidence that a plane did NOT hit the Pentagon
Ahhhhh!
At least one of you is semi honest.
So:
Is your point that since the generator trailer was hit that this would change the trajectory of the craft before impact?
Point is; whatever you want to call it, it's concrete and it is not impervious to a jet engine being dug into it at over 500mph.
Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7933608620529423729&q=nasa+crash&hl=en
OK, physics professor, show me your calculations of how the generator would have significantly changed the plane's trajectory.
I'll let you guys chew on that one for a bit.
Perhaps one of you will feel inclined to do the math to prove me wrong!
Mr. Skinny
Alien Cryogenic Engineer
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2001
- Messages
- 7,843
Can't say you are wrong, Lyte. I expect any concrete would show some damage if something travelling 500 mph hits it.
However, you need to be much more accurate in the manner in which you debate.
Words have meaning, and if you don't use them precisely, you can spend needless posts (like this one) arguing about definitions of words.
Personally, I think you got 'nuttin, but feel free to carry on.
No, trippy you show us your calculation and therebye prove you have an educated opinion. If you can't, your opinion is worth the same as any other ignorant passerby.
Oh, and given your oral fixation, I'm sure someone here has something you can chew on.
Anti-sophist
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2006
- Messages
- 1,542
You understand how the burden of proof works and on whom it falls, right?
You guys just love to argue about semantics in order to obfuscate the debate.
Thanks for at least owning up to it and admitting that my point stands.
That's a lot more than most here would ever do.
Cheers!
gumboot
lorcutus.tolere
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2006
- Messages
- 25,327
How do you know that? Your only contribution to the truth movement is to make a video... and you're not even good at doing that.
-Gumboot
Seems to me that you have not yet shown a picture that shows no damage whatsoever. If you have, please point it out to me. What you have shown are pictures with far less damage than you expected. The question is, if the materials should show damage, perhaps there is something about the geometry that came into play.
Lyte, take a look at this picture. Do you recognize it? Can you guess why it is appropriate to this thread? (hint: all the metal bracing is not original to the building. The brick, stone, and mortar are.)
BOO HOO HOO LYTE WHITEY!
You are an expert IN NO FIELD RELEVANT to what occured at the Pentagon.
YOU HAVE NO DEGREE IN ANYTHING!
To bad I know this and pointed it out.
I guess you didnt like it.
Well you know what dude...you are putting yourself out there accusing 100's of innocent people of mass murder so sorry if the truth about yourself hurts.
Your reaction just proves beyond a doubt that you have not shared ANYTHING WITH THE AUTHORITIES or THE MEDIA.
You are a fraud.
Oh and BTW who in the F are you to whine about personal attacks when you posted about Totovader "being off his meds"
Last edited:
Lyte,
How do you live with yourself?
In the other thread you post this about Llyod the cabbie.
What lies are you telling people to bring him in?
Of all of the disgusting things you and Merc have done what you have done to him just proves you have ZERO shame.
You have ridiculed and manipulated an old man.
I am sure you lied and manipulated your way into his home.
You are a fraud.
How do you live with yourself?
In the other thread you post this about Llyod the cabbie.
Questing about what?!
What lies are you telling people to bring him in?
Of all of the disgusting things you and Merc have done what you have done to him just proves you have ZERO shame.
You have ridiculed and manipulated an old man.
I am sure you lied and manipulated your way into his home.
You are a fraud.
That works great for people smart enough to at least identify a suspect if they trip over him. Alas, you fail to meet that criterion.
Point though for actually coming back to another scene of defeat for you - bet was in above that you wouldn't.
Yes Lyte please show me a detailed picture of the entire Foundation in the area of impact that shows us NO DAMAGE.
So far you have show some low rez (yes the ones you have show are of poor resolution for the kind of thing we are looking for) pics of a couple of areas that appear to be near the impact zone.
TAM
So far you have show some low rez (yes the ones you have show are of poor resolution for the kind of thing we are looking for) pics of a couple of areas that appear to be near the impact zone.
TAM
oh, and by the way, saucy pup,
(1)the two situations/events I am talking about are related, in the sense that both involve the collision of a large alluminum and metal based object coliding with a thick Concrete wall/object at high speed.
(2)My points are valid, at least to most of the people here, in that the thicker the concrete, the less likely to be damaged, and hitting such concrete, when it is embedded and pressed up against the planet earth will likely do less damage to the concrete than if it is standing, as in the pentagon wall.
TAM
(1)the two situations/events I am talking about are related, in the sense that both involve the collision of a large alluminum and metal based object coliding with a thick Concrete wall/object at high speed.
(2)My points are valid, at least to most of the people here, in that the thicker the concrete, the less likely to be damaged, and hitting such concrete, when it is embedded and pressed up against the planet earth will likely do less damage to the concrete than if it is standing, as in the pentagon wall.
TAM