• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Paul Krugman endorses Death Panels

There are "death panels" they are run by the health insurance companies and they dole out their decisions on who can live or die all the time, all in the name of profit.
 
Well, there are two problems with that excuse:

1, Nobody "above" is agreeing with him, and
2, That still wouldn't equate to "The Left."

So yeah, another fail for you.

1) yes they are

2) sorry, I will be sure try and not use rash generalizations and instead go with the "some on the Left" wording next time...since I'm sure that "some of the Left" who also use rash generalizations will try and do the same
 
Health care rationing under a socialized system is real. I know because I'm living it.

My father was booted out of the hospital on Tuesday because he reached an arbitrarily predetermined 4 week limit. When we got him home, he was unable to walk unassisted, he couldn't talk in complete sentences and he didn't even have the strength to cross the ten feet between his bed and the toilet. I woke up to find him lying on the floor next to his bed thursday morning. I called the ambulance and took him back to the hospital.

Since thursday afternoon, they've pumped two units of packed red cells into him.

Here's one of Alberta Health's top officials (he makes 500k per year) responding to questions from journalists:



Also this week, Dr. Raj Sherman, a member of Albertas provincial legislature who moonlights on weekends as an ER doctor was removed from the Conservative party caucus and now sits as an independent after refusing to apologize for saying Albertas health care system was broken.

This is what Obamacare will look like 20 years from now.

Would you honestly prefer the American healthcare system to the Canadian one?
 
Maybe I'm missing something...there WILL or WILL NOT be "Death Panels"?


do you disagree with insurance companies deciding that a young person in good health is a better candidate for a kidney transplant than an old man who smokes and drinks?

what if the hospital decides that the kid should get the transplant before the old guy. is that evil to you?

no, its called cost/benefit analysis.
 
Last edited:
1) yes they are

Yeah...That's just lying on your part. Nobody here has posted defending Krugman's comments.

2) sorry, I will be sure try and not use rash generalizations and instead go with the "some on the Left" wording next time...since I'm sure that "some of the Left" who also use rash generalizations will try and do the same

Wow. A preemptive tu quoque fallacy. It might be impressive if it wasn't so very sad.
 
Yeah...That's just lying on your part. Nobody here has posted defending Krugman's comments.

yes they are...and they're doing so in the context of (and I'm paraphrasing) "Krugman endorses Death Panels...well, yeah...so what!? We need some sort of Death Panel process anyway whether it be physicians, etc."
 
Which you are doing by claiming that people are defending Krugman.



Then you're either lying, or delusional. Either way, nobody is defending Krugman.

yes they are.

you see...you and I have what I like to call "differing opinions". That happens sometimes. I know you believe that your opinions are really facts, but they aren't.
 
yes they are.

Contrary to the old adage, repeating a lie often enough does not magically make it true.

The funny thing is, you could easily make me look a fool by linking to a post defending him. Odd that you haven't done so - well, no, it's not odd, because nobody has.

you see...you and I have what I like to call "differing opinions". That happens sometimes. I know you believe that your opinions are really facts, but they aren't.
Aw, it's so cute that you think you can talk down to me.
 
Last edited:
Contrary to the old adage, repeating a lie often enough does not magically make it true.

The funny thing is, you could easily make me look a fool by linking to a post defending him. Odd that you haven't done so - well, no, it's not odd, because nobody has.

Aw, it's so cute that you think you can talk down to me.

cmon...let's agree to disagree on this.

Palin brought up the topic of "Death Panels"...and she was crucified by "some on the Left"

Krugman endorses the same topic...and "some on the Left" are now agreeing with him...in concept.

this is my opinion

you disagree

fine.

move on.
 
cmon...let's agree to disagree on this.

Palin brought up the topic of "Death Panels"...and she was crucified by "some on the Left"

Krugman endorses the same topic...and "some on the Left" are now agreeing with him...in concept.

this is my opinion

you disagree

fine.

move on.

LOL. Nope, you still got caught in a bold-faced lie.
 
Much chemotherapy extends life only a small amount, and the patient is as sick as a dog. Costs tens of thousands of dollars, for a couple additional weeks of illness. Not prolonging live, merely drawing out the death. Not a rational cost/benefit result. I'd say the death panels ought to start there. Then move on to transplants.
 
Organ donation boards decide who are better candidates for organ transplant. They often pass over older folks and folks who are alchoholic, smokers, etc.

It makes sense. A young kid in great shape should get a transplant before an old guy who smokes and drinks.

Its called cost/benefit analysis. Its called common sense.

GOPers call it a "death panel".
 
And you can easily generalize every single socialized health care system in the world, no matter how different they may be, with your individual experience in a lightly populated Canadian province.

I wasn't generalizing all the worlds health care programs. I was showing that the phenomenon of rationing is real. And that there is evidence to support Palins predictions that rationing is a possible outcome.
 
Would you honestly prefer the American healthcare system to the Canadian one?

Would the American system have been able to find the cause of my fathers blood loss in less than four weeks?

If not, would they have been willing to keep him for five weeks?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom