Passing Peak Trump?

[Belz...]

I truly do not understand what you are asking me.

If it is not: Can the expressed political opinions of someone answering questions over the telephone be linked to a name, and that name be recorded?.
I do not know what it is.

I have asked for clarification in good faith.

And I've clarified it in good faith numerous times.

I don't believe you.

 

[bonzombiekitty]

That's the way that I interpret it, that Trump supporters won't hang up, but will lie whereas Democrats wouldn't lie or hang up.

...and there's enough of them to make a real impact on the results.

If that's the position, I find it highly questionable.

 

[Distracted1]

And I've clarified it in good faith numerous times.

I don't believe you.

What post clarified it?
I will read it again.
and ignore that it was initially answering a question with a question.

 

[Belz...]

What post clarified it?
I will read it again.

No you won't. I've already tried that. I won't fall for it again.

 

[Distracted1]

No you won't. I've already tried that. I won't fall for it again.

Then I must consider those questions answered.

Perhaps now you will answer these: (asked before yours, BTW)

Are ones' intentions to vote for one candidate or another personal, or not?

If they are, do pollsters ask for them?, or not?

 

[Belz...]

You don't even know what the question was but you consider it answered? Sure. That makes sense.

If they are, do pollsters ask for them?, or not?

Them who?

 

[Distracted1]

You don't even know what the question was but you consider it answered? Sure. That makes sense.



Them who?

Indeed. the answers are "yes" and "yes". We can proceed from there if you like.


The intentions to vote for one candidate or another. (clearly stated in the previous sentence)

 

[Belz...]

The intentions to vote for one candidate or another. (clearly stated in the previous sentence)

Sorry, what about these intentions?

 

[Distracted1]

Sorry, what about these intentions?

Ahh, the entire thing was a dodge to avoid answering.
Explains why you would not clarify.
Okay.

 

[Belz...]

Ahh, the entire thing was a dodge to avoid answering.
Explains why you would not clarify.
Okay.

I truly do not understand what you are asking me.

I have asked for clarification in good faith.

 

[Distracted1]

I truly do not understand what you are asking me.

I have asked for clarification in good faith.

That's okay. Answer the question you think is being asked then.

 

[Belz...]

That's okay. Answer the question you think is being asked then.

Ok: Spinach. It's definitely spinach.

 

[Distracted1]

Can they be linked to a name? Is that name recorded?

The voting intentions can be linked to a name, and recorded. (answered)
The respondents can be linked to a name, and recorded. (answered)

what else! are you referring to!?!?

The pollster!?? Can the pollster be linked to a name, and recorded- I really don't think you mean that yet there is nothing else there that is evident.

 

[Belz...]

The voting intentions can be linked to a name, and recorded. (answered)
The respondents can be linked to a name, and recorded. (answered)

what else! are you referring to!?!?

Vegetables, at this point.

 

[Distracted1]

Vegetables, at this point.

Just dodging, then.
Going a long way to not have to own up to your false statement that "pollsters do not ask for personal information"
Kudos, for going so far to avoid admitting you were wrong.

 

[Belz...]

Just dodging, then.

I'm using performance art to explain my feelings of frustration by subjecting you to same.

But you knew that already.

Since I've already told you that I don't believe you, you can stop pretending to really wanting to discuss this with me.

Going a long way to not have to own up to your false statement that "pollsters do not ask for personal information"

They don't.

 

[Distracted1]

I'm using performance art to explain my feelings of frustration by subjecting you to same.

But you knew that already.

Since I've already told you that I don't believe you, you can stop pretending to really wanting to discuss this with me.



They don't.

Because who one intends to vote for is not personal?

or Because pollsters don't ask that?

 

[Belz...]

Because who one intends to vote for is not personal?

I've already answred that: using that logic, any opinion is personal information, but that's playing with words.

 

[Distracted1]

I've already answred that: using that logic, any opinion is personal information, but that's playing with words.

Not automatically.
Voting is typically done by secret ballot, because it is considered more personal than other information.

We call our orders for big macs' right into the little speaker in the drive-thru, because our order at a fast food restaurant is not personal.

In general conversation, our sexual preferences, income, and voting habits are considered rude to be asked about unless specific permission is given in advance.

What movie we saw last night, or what we had for breakfast, not so much.

 

[Belz...]

Not automatically.
Voting is typically done by secret ballot, because it is considered more personal than other information.

We call our orders for big macs' right into the little speaker in the drive-thru, because our order at a fast food restaurant is not personal.

In general conversation, our sexual preferences, income, and voting habits are considered rude to be asked about unless specific permission is given in advance.

What movie we saw last night, or what we had for breakfast, not so much.

As I said: you're using the term very broadly. Polling isn't supposed to record that information. If they do, or if you suspect that they do, then don't answer them. Better yet, don't have a phone or the internet.