Over Unity is No Longer Disputable

g4macdad said:
Damn you are right! The overwhelming majority of "scientists" have never been shown to be wrong!:boggled:
Click to expand...
Oh, they have, many times. But they were shown to be wrong by, er, being shown to be wrong.

Assuming that they're wrong and then waving your hands about a lot doesn't have quite the same effect.
 
joobz said:
What's a "normal" pendulum?

This is a rather foolish thing to say.
1.) No one denies completely the possibility that unknown sources of energy may exist. You are wrong here.
2.) If other energy sources exist, they would be subject to THE EXACT SAME LAWS OF CONSERVATION!!!!
Click to expand...

If you looked it up you would know what I mean by, normal pendulum. Milkov's machine has one in it. It is an amazing machine but does not even run more than a few seconds much less over 40 mins.
 
PixyMisa said:
Oh, they have, many times. But they were shown to be wrong by, er, being shown to be wrong.

Assuming that they're wrong and then waving your hands about a lot doesn't have quite the same effect.
Click to expand...
And, let's not forget, if the "overwhelming majority of scientists" have been shown to be wrong, then the odds are pretty good that the current perpetual motion guys will be shown to be wrong.

Oops, I guess he proved our point for us, didn't he?
 
g4macdad said:
Are you a troll?
Click to expand...
Nope. Insisting that you answer a pretty simple question, and not allowing you to weasel out of it, doesn't make me a "troll".

Are you going to actually answer the question now? I didn't have any problem answering your question, after all.
 
I am beginning to become suspicious. If one was not interested in OU why would he reply here?

Why are you so concerned with others being suckered by it?

Something is awry here.:cool:
 
g4macdad said:
If you looked it up you would know what I mean by, normal pendulum. Milkov's machine has one in it. It is an amazing machine but does not even run more than a few seconds much less over 40 mins.
Click to expand...
"Normal" = what Milkov made?

So, a pivot pendulum is a normal pendulum?
what about a weight suspended between two wire points? Is this not a normal pendulum?
What about a free swinging pendulum? Is this no longer a normal pendulum?

Is there a "normal" amount of friction allowable at the pivot point?
 
g4macdad said:
If you looked it up you would know what I mean by, normal pendulum. Milkov's machine has one in it. It is an amazing machine but does not even run more than a few seconds much less over 40 mins.
Click to expand...
My folks have a grandfather clock, with a pendulum, and it runs for weeks at a time without doing anything at all to it. So, I can promise you that there are devices with pendulums in them that can run for well over 40 minutes without anyone touching them.
 
g4macdad said:
I am beginning to become suspicious. If one was not interested in OU why would he reply here?

Why are you so concerned with others being suckered by it?

Something is awry here.:cool:
Click to expand...
I'm wondering why you'll do anything besides answer simple questions.
 
JoeEllison said:
My folks have a grandfather clock, with a pendulum, and it runs for weeks at a time without doing anything at all to it. So, I can promise you that there are devices with pendulums in them that can run for well over 40 minutes without anyone touching them.
Click to expand...

If you think what you just said is correct, you nave no business replying here.

JREFers: Friends don't let friends drink and post!
 
Hokulele said:
Which one, yours or Michael C's? The first doesn't mention anything about length of time, and MC's had references to how long it had been running, but no indication of a maximum length of time. So, in your expert opinion, how long should a pendulum run?
Click to expand...

The Milkovic dual mechanical oscillation system is what I am referring to.

You can look up the video on your own if you are intersested. If you are not interested in the subject, and you are replying here, you must be a troll.
 
g4macdad said:
If you think what you just said is correct, you nave no business replying here.

JREFers: Friends don't let friends drink and post!
Click to expand...
You typed "nave" instead of "have"... maybe you should get some friends?

Seriously, though... my parents have a grandfather clock. It contains no battery. It is not plugged into a wall. It runs for weeks on end with no input of energy whatsoever.

So why should I believe you when you set 40 minutes as the upper limit of a device with a pendulum in it?
 
g4macdad said:
The Milkovic dual mechanical oscillation system is what I am referring to.

You can look up the video on your own if you are intersested. If you are not interested in the subject, and you are replying here, you must be a troll.
Click to expand...


I did look at the video. It doesn't mention a maximum time frame. You suggested that 40 minutes is impossible, implying that you know a maximum. What would that be?

I am interested in the subject, which is why I am asking you questions. You refuse to give me the answers when I am asking politely. Why do you consider that trolling?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom