• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Ongoing Adventures of Kyle Rittenhouse

thaiboxerken said:
Nope. The fact that he went to a protest to shoot people, and killed people, adds to the determination that he looks like a murderer. Legally, he may not be a murderer, but morally he is. He was only acquited because he's a white person living in a white supremacist government.
Click to expand...

I strongly suspect that if he'd been black, you would have been giving him the benefit of the doubt. White supremacist government? Seriously?!
 
thaiboxerken said:
Nope. The fact that he went to a protest to shoot people, and killed people, adds to the determination that he looks like a murderer. Legally, he may not be a murderer, but morally he is. He was only acquited because he's a white person living in a white supremacist government.
Click to expand...
Funny how the people he shot all happened to be terrible people. You think he just got lucky?

And given that the people he shot were all white, I'm not sure how much white supremacy has to do with any of this. And the government prosecuted him. It's a jury, which isn't the government, which acquitted him. So your complaint looks a lot like paranoid rantings divorced from reality.
 
Gulliver Foyle said:
That's because he is. Just because he got a corrupt judge to pervert the law to let him off doesn't make him any less so.
Click to expand...
Bwahahaha!

No. The judge didn't pervert anything. The case against him was garbage from the start, the prosecutors engaged in misconduct, and the judge correctly called them on it.
 
Roger Ramjets said:
Yeah, he was just in the right place at the right time with the right weapon - by pure coincidence. :xrolleyes
Click to expand...
That's sort of my question: was it a coincidence (ie, luck) that everyone that Kyle shot was a terrible person? Or is there maybe a causal correlation? Don't be coy, let's hear your answer.
 
plague311 said:
I'm not downloading or opening a pdf just to read about someone I don't really care that much about. Can't you just tell me? You don't source half the ◊◊◊◊ you say anyway, why is this different?
Click to expand...
You complain that I don't source things, but you also refuse to look at my source. That's... ironic.

It's his criminal history, including domestic violence, burglary, stalking, drunk driving, and illegal firearm possession.
 
Ziggurat said:
You complain that I don't source things, but you also refuse to look at my source. That's... ironic.

It's his criminal history, including domestic violence, burglary, stalking, drunk driving, and illegal firearm possession.
Click to expand...

I'm on my work computer, I'm not going to download a ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ pdf just so you can try to prove a point.

Wasn't Rittenhouse literally illegally possessing a straw purchased firearm that he wasn't supposed to have that very evening?

Anyway, this doesn't mean much to me. Personally, if you guys gush over this idiot then good for you. I try not to glorify people that kill others, but I'm not a Trump supporter. I don't have that level of default hate in my life.
 
Last edited:
plague311 said:
I'm on my work computer, I'm not going to download a ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ pdf just so you can try to prove a point.
Click to expand...
Try to prove a point? I did prove it.
plague311 said:
Wasn't Rittenhouse literally illegally possessing a straw purchased firearm that he wasn't supposed to have that very evening?
Click to expand...
Nope. There were accusations of a straw purchase based on false early reports that he had the gun in his possession in Illinois, but that was never the case. And the charges of his illegal possession were thrown out because they didn't meet the statutory requirements, and he was in fact legally allowed to be carrying. It wouldn't have been legal for him to carry a pistol or a short barrel gun, but he wasn't.
plague311 said:
Anyway, this doesn't mean much to me. Personally, if you guys gush over this idiot then good for you.
Click to expand...
Oh, I'm not gushing over him. He may or may not be a terrible person (I have not argued either way), that doesn't really matter to me. But what he isn't is a murderer. That much is crystal clear. It takes Trump derangement to not be able to recognize that.
 
Ziggurat said:
That's a rather passive aggressive way of conceding that I'm right.
Click to expand...

If this is a win you need, you cherish it lol. I asked a simple question because I wasn't aware of their history because I don't feel the need to dig into the lives of people who were shot by a petty little bitch. It didn't mean much to me, it doesn't mean much to me now. That night he seemed like he was out to help people, not hurt anyone.

This obviously means a lot to you because now you're hear boasting about being right when I never even ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ said you were wrong lol.

Like I said, cool story bro. You get 10...nay, 15 internet points today. You go ahead and tell all your friends and family that you were right on the internet, and don't spend all those internet points at one place, ok?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom