• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Ongoing Adventures of Kyle Rittenhouse

And the fantasy version continues to roll on. In the wrong thread for it.

Rooting for his cowardice should at least be confined to another thread, as this one is about ongoing adventures, as opposed to reliving his fearful weakness.
 
ongoing adventures...

Nothing in the news today, he's probably just chilling.
This thread here "could be a place where we could discuss what Kyle Rittenhouse is up to" but since he's not up to anything noteworthy, maybe other tangenital items regarding the after-case fallout can be part of the discussion? Or not. We got five pages out of it, without really anything interesting about Kyle's Adventures being posted, so there's that.

I do know that Congressman Jerry Nadler, D-New York has spread false information about the case. (He serves as the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.) -- he repeated the incorrect information about 'crossing state lines with an AR15'

I do know that four protesters have sued the city and county of Kenosha, as they allege the curfews were selectively enforced against protesters. It seeks to be certified as a class action on behalf of all the people cited for curfew violations.

I do know Dominick Black is still in hot water.

I do not know of any ongoing specifics regarding Kyle, so maybe the thread will have to just sit idle until something new pops up on the radar.
 
Well, we do know that Rosenbaum was indeed an evil human. ....

Nonsense. That's just your opinion. Either way, this isn't a "heroic" event. The victims that Kyle shot were not killing people, were not injuring people, or doing any otherwise "evil" acts.

Also, if Kyle was a libral that took a gun to a proud boys gathering, provoked them, and then shot them, I don't believe those of us on the left would be hailing Kyle as a hero. Self-defense is not a heroic event. Provoking violence and then defending one's self is not heroic.
 
thaiboxerken, our world is a better place with the absence of JoJo Rosenbaum.
https://heavy.com/news/criminal-records-rittenhouse-victims

Nothing about him is less than the very definition of "evil human" ---
He was a blight upon society.
In my opinion.

I don't know what videos you were watching, but in the ones I viewed, Anthony Huber was indeed engaged in the act of injuring a person --- Kyle Rittenhouse (twice, actually, with his skateboard employed as a deadly weapon). For that, he got a bullet to his chest, and a Darwin Award.

Gaige Grosskreutz? May he live a long and healthy life.
 
And therefore, the vigilante antics of Kyle are justified....

No -- this is just thaiboxerken once more showing that he failed to follow the trial even cursorily.

The justification and aquittal by jury of Kyle Rittenhouse was based on the principle of lawful self-defense against men who had NO LEGITIMATE RIGHTS to attack him, whatsoever.

That's not my opinion. Dem's da facs.
 
Last edited:
Nonsense. That's just your opinion.

Uh... what?

Is violent child rape not evil now?

Either way, this isn't a "heroic" event.

OK.

The victims that Kyle shot were not killing people, were not injuring people, or doing any otherwise "evil" acts.

Rosenbaum and Huber absolutely were doing evil acts. They just didn't get very far.

Also, if Kyle was a libral that took a gun to a proud boys gathering, provoked them

Kyle didn't provoke them.

Self-defense is not a heroic event.

Sure. But it's justified.

Provoking violence

Again, didn't happen. You're inventing justifications to hate Kyle which don't actually exist.
 
His motivation is not important. His actions were. He withdrew and attempted to avoid any further contact with those ambushers. By doing so, he was then able to claim a full right of self-defense as he was pursued and attacked. That is what the jury found, based on the evidence they heard and saw.
Case closed.

Personally, I don't really care about the trial. I'm not American so have no skin in that fight. I followed it out of interest, but having some idea how you guys view your guns, it didn't surprise me he was exonerated.

As for the 'hero' label -- that is open to debate. In the same media source quoted above (BDN) there is another letter to the editor, saying the complete opposite: "Rittenhouse is not a hero"

And so it goes.

Indeed. This is what interests me. Out of curiosity, if Rittenhouse had been a left wing ANTIFA type, who had gone into the Michigan state building on 30th April 2020 and killed several of the protestors there under similar circumstances, would you still consider him a hero?
 
Personally, I don't really care about the trial. I'm not American so have no skin in that fight. I followed it out of interest, but having some idea how you guys view your guns, it didn't surprise me he was exonerated.



Indeed. This is what interests me. Out of curiosity, if Rittenhouse had been a left wing ANTIFA type, who had gone into the Michigan state building on 30th April 2020 and killed several of the protestors there under similar circumstances, would you still consider him a hero?

I'm sure the right-wing would label him an evil person. The thing is, us lefties wouldn't consider him a hero either.
 
I'm sure the right-wing would label him an evil person. The thing is, us lefties wouldn't consider him a hero either.

As it happens, the facts surrounding the type of person that Rosenbaum was, and his actions over many years, result in him being properly DEFINED as an 'evil human' --- not anything to do with his political views.

He was not shot dead because Kyle Rittenhouse considered him an 'evil human' --- Kyle knew only that this man was literally attacking and screaming obscenities at the moment of the fatal encounter, aided by an armed Sasquatch.

As for the example given by RolandRat, the people at the Michigan statehouse were peacefully protesting, in favor of OPENING businesses, not burning them down.

Also, Roland Rat mentions "having some idea how you guys view your guns..." ---- how about NFAC? Do you have some idea about their view on guns? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yvhFcr9mPBQ
 
As it happens, the facts surrounding the type of person that Rosenbaum was, and his actions over many years, result in him being properly DEFINED as an 'evil human' --- not anything to do with his political views.

He was not shot dead because Kyle Rittenhouse considered him an 'evil human' --- Kyle knew only that this man was literally attacking and screaming obscenities at the moment of the fatal encounter, aided by an armed Sasquatch.

As for the example given by RolandRat, the people at the Michigan statehouse were peacefully protesting, in favor of OPENING businesses, not burning them down.

Also, Roland Rat mentions "having some idea how you guys view your guns..." ---- how about NFAC? Do you have some idea about their view on guns? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yvhFcr9mPBQ

Kyle only knew that the opportunity to kill people and get away with it just presented itself, as he intended.
 
Of course you didn't....how precious.

I watched the entire thing, from start to finish, and even provided many links here in the Forums.

If you are making a claim about something that was brought forward at the trial, please link to the testimony.
 
Kyle only knew that the opportunity to kill people and get away with it just presented itself, as he intended.
I saw no evidence to that statement of yours at his trial.
Of course you didn't....how precious.
Well, to be fair... the judge did block the use of the video which showed Rittenhouse wanting to shoot random people leaving a store.

If someone watched only the trial, they would not have seen that.

On the other hand, a rational person who examined ALL the evidence (even stuff available outside the trial, such as the video) would have seen the video and come to the conclusion that yes, Rittenhouse was a wanna-be shooter.
 
I am not sure that video illustrates what you think it illustrates.

I am sure that there's a lot of regular people across this country who would absolutely like to take their firearms and shoot flash-mob looters that they may encounter. Security Guards would probably like to do so, also. Even a lot of cops would love that option, if they're being honest.

https://www.dailysabah.com/world/am...ke-in-flash-mob-thefts-news-crew-guard-killed
 
I am not sure that video illustrates what you think it illustrates.

I am sure that there's a lot of regular people across this country who would absolutely like to take their firearms and shoot flash-mob looters that they may encounter. Security Guards would probably like to do so, also. Even a lot of cops would love that option, if they're being honest.

https://www.dailysabah.com/world/am...ke-in-flash-mob-thefts-news-crew-guard-killed
And if any of these make believe people actually did shoot someone after previously saying they wanted to do so on video it might be used to show intent. The defense attorneys did their jobs well in having that thrown out.
 
I am not sure that video illustrates what you think it illustrates.

I am sure that there's a lot of regular people across this country who would absolutely like to take their firearms and shoot flash-mob looters that they may encounter. Security Guards would probably like to do so, also. Even a lot of cops would love that option, if they're being honest.

https://www.dailysabah.com/world/am...ke-in-flash-mob-thefts-news-crew-guard-killed

And that's the whole gig in a nutshell. We have people with fascist fantasies of shooting Americans in the streets with impunity.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom