• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Pixie of key: Quotes lies and delusions from a commenter on a blog article

Pixie of key said:
Tuxford - 3 hours ago
Click to expand...
Now you ignorantly quote lies and delusions from a commenter on a blog article :jaw-dropp!
What else can we expect from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos?

There are no "daughter galaxies" or "core stars" in Hotspots in an active galactic nucleus
The nucleus of a so-called "active" galaxy contains a massive black hole that is vigorously accreting material. As a result, the nucleus often ejects bipolar jets of rapidly moving charged particles that radiate brightly at many wavelengths, in particular radio wavelengths. Active galaxies display a range of dramatically different properties, and the ones that are bright in the radio can beam as much as one trillion solar luminosities of radiation into space at those wavelengths.
The intense emission arises from the hot environment of the black hole because electrons, moving at close to the speed of light in an environment of strong magnetic fields, radiate in the radio. The directed particle jets eventually collide with the ambient medium and convert much of their bulk energy of motion into shocks. The points of termination in the jet flow are seen as very hot spots, bright and compact structures.
Click to expand...


This is not a deluded "mechanism for how galactic clusters can form".

This idiot even links to Image: A supermassive black hole in action with a short explanation of how supermassive black holes generate jets.
 
Last edited:
Pixie of key: Resorts to insults and lies

Pixie of key said:
Only idiot believe that expanding space exist.
Click to expand...
Insults and lies from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos.
Einstein was not an idiot :eek:!
Hubble was not an idiot!
The thousands of scientists who have worked on the evidence that leads to the conclusion that the universe is expanding were not idiots!
The millions of science students who have learned about the evidence for an expanding universe are not idiots.

An idiot would be anyone who persists in being ignorant of the evidence for an expanding universe or cannot understand it and does not believe people who know what they are talking about.
 
Last edited:
Yes, visible universe expanding all a time.

Thats why we can see what we see with expanding eyes.

Space is not expanding!


Expanding space is a lie!

You cant see space any way.

Space is not emit information any way!


Expanding space is religion.

Love
1038
:)
 
Pixie of key said:
Yes, visible universe expanding all a time.

Thats why we can see what we see with expanding eyes.

Space is not expanding!


Expanding space is a lie!

You cant see space any way.

Space is not emit information any way!


Expanding space is religion.

Love
1038
:)
Click to expand...

My 14 year old grandson could explain it to you.
 
Pixie of key: Usual gibberish and expanding spacetme delusions

Pixie of key said:
...Yes yes. This is handwaving with out real explanation.
Click to expand...
No no. This is the usual ignorant delusion from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos :jaw-dropp![/QUOTE]
The mathematics of GR says that a universe must be expanding or contracting or static.
Looking at the real universe shows that it is expanding.
 
Last edited:
"Looking at the real universe shows that it is expanding."

You looking old expanging light spectrum which proof that also light expanding.

How you look expanding space?

Yes yes, you lie again.

You cant see expanding space and cant make science test for or with expanding space.

Expanding space is like a Zeus or some other god.

Love
1038
:)
 
Pixie of key: Repeated delusion that we can "see expanding space"

Pixie of key said:
"Looking at the real universe shows that it is expanding."
Click to expand...
Repeated ignorant delusion that we can or need to "see expanding space" from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos


Spacetime is what gives the things that we can see, e.g. galaxies position and time. It is the real world fact that galaxies travel away from us faster the further away that they are from us that tells rational people that the space between the galaxies is expanding - an expanding universe.
 
Lawrence M. Krauss

A Universe from Nothing

page 131

"In the end, observable universe would have grown faster than light. This is allowed in the general theory of relativity, although the narrow theory of relativity is that nothing can move faster than light. This is, however, think like a lawyer. A minimal theory of relativity says that nothing can move in space faster than light, but according to the general theory of relativity space itself can do whatever comes to mind. with the expansion of space can pass the songs that are at rest with respect to space, but distancing themselves asunder faster than light. "

This says it all, heh heh heh.

"General Theory of Relativity, the space itself can do whatever comes to mind."

That is, it is a similar concept to what the gods are.

love
1038
:)
 
A lonely reference (and you do not see the gobbledy-gook within that reference) does not a world-wide body of evidence, observation and calculation overturn.
 
Pixie of key fantasizes about science - item 130

Pixie of key said:
Lawrence M. Krauss

A Universe from Nothing

page 131

"In the end, observable universe would have grown faster than light. This is allowed in the general theory of relativity, although the narrow theory of relativity is that nothing can move faster than light. This is, however, think like a lawyer. A minimal theory of relativity says that nothing can move in space faster than light, but according to the general theory of relativity space itself can do whatever comes to mind. with the expansion of space can pass the songs that are at rest with respect to space, but distancing themselves asunder faster than light. "
Click to expand...
That is standard science as known by millions of physic students but not a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos


The translation (presumably from Finnish) is really bad though. The science is simple. Special Relativity states that objects cannot move faster than the speed of light other than speculative tachyon particles that always move faster than light. In SR, spacetime itself cannot expand. General Relativity allows spacetime to expand and that expansion is not limited to the speed of light.
 
Last edited:
How the material can expand out onto the existing space?

The substance consists of separate structures that move relative to each other in space. business / movement separate structures in space allows for the expansion of the substance?

Allowing the expansion of space itself somehow in some way?

No one knows. Still, millions of physics believe in the existence of an expanding space.

Why?

Love
1038
:)
 
Pixie of key said:
How the material can expand out onto the existing space?
Click to expand...
Followed by gibberish but the answer is that "the material" does not expand out onto the existing space.
It is space that is expanding. For example, the distance between galaxies gets bigger and we measure that (Hubble's Law).

Pixie of key said:
No one knows
Click to expand...
This is a lie because millions and maybe billions of high school students know about the expansion of space.
 
Space is eternal and infinite room that is nothing at all.

Therefore space does not expand or arch.

The general redshift of light does not prove that expanding space exists.

The bending in the trajectory of light for example when passing the sun does not prove that arching space exists.

So called gravitational redshift of light does not prove that gravitation or arching space exist.

The phenomena in question are a proof of photons expanding and recycling expanding motion/energy among each other and therefore the light generally redshifts during its journey. Therefore the light bends when it passes the sun and therefore the expanding light protruding outward from the dense star gravitationally redshifts so to speak.

New expanding photons interact with old expanding photons that originate from other galaxies of the superbunch/cluster of galaxies. Interacting with new expanding photons the speed of old expanding photons increases and therefore the old light generally redshifts so to speak.

Expanding photons that are originally from billions of galaxies protrude towards the expanding sun. These photons have recycled expanding motion/energy during their journey and the motion/energy protrudes towards the sun in the areas in between the expanding photons and then collides with the expanding photons that are protruding past the sun getting their trajectory to bend towards the expanding sun.


L
O
V
E

1038
:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom