• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

of WTC7 and things being pulled

Killtown said:
#2, you can tell by how it imploded just like a classic controlled demolition.
Click to expand...
so who uses "pull" referring to explosive demolition?

you do know "implosion" is not synonymous with "controlled demolition" right? and implosion is a specific type of CD, it is the most difficult and rarest used (and WTC was most certainly NOT an implosion)
 
defaultdotxbe said:
do "they" have names? did "they" know for a fact that WTC7 was going to collapse, or were "they" stating an opinion?
Click to expand...
Lets see:

7) Captain Chris Boyle: they said all right, number 7 is [probably] coming down,
8) Battalion Chief John Norman: they’re telling us that 7 [might] fall down
 
defaultdotxbe said:
my guess is 3, WTC 4, 5 and 6 (WTC3 was already compeltely destroyed by the collpase of the towers)
Click to expand...
What about any non-WTC building?

Was is just a coincidence that ALL seven WTC buildings were destroyed and ZERO non-WTC buildings were except that small ugly Greek Church?
 
Killtown said:
Lets see:

7) Captain Chris Boyle: they said all right, number 7 is [probably] coming down,
8) Battalion Chief John Norman: they’re telling us that 7 [might] fall down
Click to expand...
and who is "they?"

i mean seriously, arent you the one who wants the "truth?" shouldnt you be tryign to find out who told them WTC& was goignt o collapse?
 
defaultdotxbe said:
1) so who uses "pull" referring to explosive demolition?

2) you do know "implosion" is not synonymous with "controlled demolition" right? and implosion is a specific type of CD, it is the most difficult and rarest used (and WTC was most certainly NOT an implosion)
Click to expand...
1) Looks like Larry did.

2) Really? Can you show me on example of what you're talking about?
 
Killtown said:
What about any non-WTC building?

Was is just a coincidence that ALL seven WTC buildings were destroyed and ZERO non-WTC buildings were except that small ugly Greek Church?
Click to expand...
is it just a coincidence that all non-WTC buildings were outside the WTC complex and thus farther away from the towers?
 
Again, KillTown refuses to acknowledge that none of those quotes had authority concerning the "pull out orders". Even though I have shown him the person who gave the order was Chief Daniel Nigro.

So ..pathetic. Must be easy to live in your world.
 
If Silverstein felt he had something to prove he would have crushed someone in court. I'd like to see Mr "from couch-to-couch" pay up those legal fees, including the antisemitic slanders. I find Silverstein a very cool guy to NOT do so.

Plus, how many times do people have to refute the pull it ****? Get over the insinuations, get to the real evidence.
 
Killtown said:
Even the buildings next to the 7?
Click to expand...
the buildigns next to 7 were masonry, they take abuse a bit better than steel buildings, although it wouldnt surprise me if there were fears that they too would collapse (of course since they didnt there arent any CTers strip mining for quotes so we dont see them)

Yes, will you support a true independent investigation so we can find all this out?
Click to expand...
if by "support" you mean send you 50 cents so you can use a payphone to call the firehouse and ask who told them WTC7 was going to collapse, sure, whats your address?
 
defaultdotxbe said:
looks like circular reasoning

http://www.implosionworld.com/dyk2.html
Click to expand...

Hmm, Let's look at what the experts say:

DID YOU KNOW that only a small percentage of explosive demolition jobs are true 'building implosions'?

Webster’s Dictionary defines implosion as "a violent collapse inward". In the demolition industry, a blaster is usually trying to pull a structure away from adjacent exposures and towards an area large enough to contain the debris. Therefore, the only time a building is truly 'imploded' is when exposures (other structures or areas of concern) completely surround it. When this situation exists, the blaster has no choice; he must make the building collapse in on itself. This is by far the trickiest type of explosive demolition project, and there are only a handful of blasting companies in the world that possess enough experience—and insurance—to perform these true building implosions.
Click to expand...

So how was this different with the WTC 7?

PS - did you noticed how they used the word "pull"?
 
Killtown said:
Hmm, Let's look at what the experts say:



So how was this different with the WTC 7?

PS - did you noticed how they used the word "pull"?
Click to expand...

PS - Did you notice that no demolitions expert has ever used that term to describe demolishing a building with explosives?
 
I showed a video that displays the meaning of the word "Pull it"

I've shown words of the the man who gave the order to get people out of WTC7 as well as the source.

Any sensible person would've stopped. This is just an example of 9/11 Deniers being based more on faith then science. They not only want to believe the government, but have to.
 
MarkyX said:
Again, KillTown refuses to acknowledge that none of those quotes had authority concerning the "pull out orders". Even though I have shown him the person who gave the order was Chief Daniel Nigro.

So ..pathetic. Must be easy to live in your world.
Click to expand...
The only thing that is pathetic are people who don't understand that we are talking about rescuers being told it was going to collapse, not about pull-out orders. Two seperate things, but thanks for playing.
 
Killtown said:
The only thing that is pathetic are people who don't understand that we are talking about rescuers being told it was going to collapse, not about pull-out orders. Two seperate things, but thanks for playing.
Click to expand...


"The most important operational decision to be made that afternoon was the collapse (Of the WTC towers) had damaged 7 World Trade Center, which is about a 50 story building, at Vesey between West Broadway and Washington Street. It had very heavy fire on many floors and I ordered the evacuation of an area sufficient around to protect our members, so we had to give up some rescue operations that were going on at the time and back the people away far enough so that if 7 World Trade did collapse, we [wouldn't] lose any more people. We continued to operate on what we could from that distance and approximately an hour and a half after that order was [given], at 5:30 in the afternoon, World Trade Center collapsed completely" - Daniel Nigro

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/Nigro_Daniel.txt

Are you calling Chief Daniel Nigro a liar, KillTown?
 
Killtown said:
Hmm, Let's look at what the experts say:



So how was this different with the WTC 7?

PS - did you noticed how they used the word "pull"?
Click to expand...
its different from WTC7 because 7 damaged several buildings around it when it collapsed, kindof the exact opposite of what they are going for with an implosion

PS did you notice how they arent using pull to describe the demolition itself?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom