Observations on atheists

[Z]

Tolerating belief is one thing; tolerating ignorance, quite another.

 

[Maledict]

Tolerating belief is one thing; tolerating ignorance, quite another.

Indeed - unfortunately, Iacchus tends to display the latter.

 

[dmarker]

My question:
But how do you know that there is really a deity as opposed to a mere chemical reaction in your brain?

Iacchus' answer:

Please click on picture to go to True Church.

I'll take that to mean that you don't really know that there are any deities whatsoever.

 

[Radrook]

His posts rather exemplify the phenomenon.

--J.D.

Which goes to show that you don't know equivocation from urination. Probably think it's right next to your tendinous buccinator attachment. That's what too much Jerry Springer will do.

 

[Z]

The informal fallacy that can result when an ambiguous word or phrase is used in different senses within a single argument. Example: "Odd things arouse human suspicion. But seventeen is an odd number. Therefore, seventeen arouses human suspicion."

http://www.philosophypages.com/dy/e5.htm

I think I know equivocate from urinate.

However, I've only seen equivocation from LifeGazer, Iacchus, and Irritating Ian, so far - and ignorance from you.

 

[Radrook]

http://www.philosophypages.com/dy/e5.htm

I think I know equivocate from urinate.

However, I've only seen equivocation from LifeGazer, Iacchus, and Irritating Ian, so far - and ignorance from you.

Coming from the likes of you--I take that as a compliment.

 

[Radrook]

Coming from the likes of you--I take that as a compliment.

toidi

 

[Z]

?toidi a gnillac uoy era ohW

 

[Iacchus]

With God belief any belief is possible.

And every belief is, don't you think?

 

[Iacchus]

My question:
But how do you know that there is really a deity as opposed to a mere chemical reaction in your brain?

Iacchus' answer:

I'll take that to mean that you don't really know that there are any deities whatsoever.

Obviously you didn't think my post was directed to you, otherwise why would there be a post inbetween? Perhaps we shouldn't misconstrue my ignoring a dumb question for the inability to give a meaningful reply?

 

[Iacchus]

toidi

Ad hominem.

 

[Iacchus]

How dare any theist not believe in everything!

Actually the most important thing here I think is that you have a Mother and a Father and, a sense of beginning. This is really all that religion entails.

 

[Iacchus]

Baiting? Hardly - more or less means that I've grown tired of repeating myself asking you to address the points.

Actually, with all the ad hominem attacks from the very onset, I couldn't help but think you were one of the most ignorant people on the board. But now, that you've come out of the closest so to speak, I couldn't help but think I was being baited.

And, while I don't happen to agree with you, you certainly do have something to say. In fact it's hard to believe that you're only 17. Of course I am too, give or take 30 years.

 

[wittgenst3in]

And, while I don't happen to agree with you, you certainly do have something to say. In fact it's hard to believe that you're only 17. Of course I am too, give or take 30 years.

I find it hard to believe that RabbiSatan is younger than Iacchus too. From reading their posts I'm sure it would be the other way around.

 

[thaiboxerken]

Iacchus, you have no real authority to call anyone ignorant, since you are extremely ignorant of how reality works and what real evidence is. You are ignorant of logic and reason and you are ignorant of what is actually intelligent thinking. You are a fool trying to play a game of chess with the chess masters. You have lost all of your debates in the forum, and every post you place only shows the world how much of an idiot you really are. Rabbi Satan, at 17, is much more mature, intelligent and a much better critical thinker than you ever were or will be.

 

[Iacchus]

I find it hard to believe that RabbiSatan is younger than Iacchus too. From reading their posts I'm sure it would be the other way around.

You're only as young as you feel.

 

[Iacchus]

Iacchus, you have no real authority to call anyone ignorant, since you are extremely ignorant of how reality works and what real evidence is. You are ignorant of logic and reason and you are ignorant of what is actually intelligent thinking. You are a fool trying to play a game of chess with the chess masters. You have lost all of your debates in the forum, and every post you place only shows the world how much of an idiot you really are. Rabbi Satan, at 17, is much more mature, intelligent and a much better critical thinker than you ever were or will be.

Exactly! I really don't know anything which, is what I've been trying to tell everyone all along.

 

[Iacchus]

I find it hard to believe that RabbiSatan is younger than Iacchus too. From reading their posts I'm sure it would be the other way around.

Yeah, have you seen his avatar? He sure looks like a grumpy old man now doesn't he?

 

[Doctor X]

Which goes to show that you don't know equivocation from urination.

The Coward exemplifies both.

Probably think it's right next to your tendinous (sic) buccinator attachment.

Temporalis.

That's what too much Jerry Springer will do.

As the Coward has demonstrated with his ignorance above.

Now run along, little boy, else you may have to confront the evidence.

--J.D.