But he had a concept of a plan for a policy!the rapist didn't even have the better policies.
But he had a concept of a plan for a policy!the rapist didn't even have the better policies.
The lifelong-criminal, twice-impeached, insurrectionist, Covid-spreading-and-killing, marital-cheating, no-tax-paying, selfish, hateful, stupid, off-the-charts ignorant, malignantly-narcissistic, un-American, anti-American, racist, psychopath, con-man rapist, thank you very much.That anyone could vote for a known rapist will always be beyond me.
I know it's probably wrong but because I dislike him, I didn't want to mention any of his better points when I mentioned he is a rapist.The lifelong-criminal, twice-impeached, insurrectionist, Covid-spreading-and-killing, marital-cheating, no-tax-paying, selfish, hateful, stupid, off-the-charts ignorant, malignantly-narcissistic, racist, psychopath, con man, rapist, thank you very much.
Fair.I know it's probably wrong but because I dislike him, I didn't want to mention any of his better points when I mentioned he is a rapist.
Based on the current festival of tariff ◊◊◊◊-ups, he hasn't even got an inkling of a concept yet.But he had a concept of a plan for a policy!
Now that is a non sequitur. Well done!It wasn't your vaunted Evil Party that removed Biden from the election due to his apparent cognitive lack.
That he would tell us about... in two weeks.But he had a concept of a plan for a policy!the rapist didn't even have the better policies.
But, but... Biden once put his hand on the shoulder of a young woman who was not his family.That anyone could vote for a known rapist will always be beyond me.
And of course holding those who voted for Trump to account is right out, no it is clearly the democrats fault not those who supported Trump.Show me the post where I literally said that.
You can't, because I didn't say that. And I certainly didn't mean it. What I meant was, the Democrats were too ineffectual to prevent it. Which, given the enormity of what they failed to prevent, adds up to a lot more than "slightly" ineffectual in my book. "Colossally irrelevant" would be another way of putting it.
This claim has been belabored in the "what Democrats did wrong" thread. The consensus there seems to be that the Democrats were utterly powerless to change the outcome of the election. Now you're balking at me making the same characterization here?