NSA Document Flight 93 intercepted coming soon

[jaydeehess]

Whoa,,,,,,,,,deja vu

Its like I've already read the posts on this page before today even though the timestamps says they were posted today.

 

[Gavron]

Gotta agree with you there, Jay. Just roll the year back a couple years, and you would see the same answers.

Nothing new here, move along.

 

[Lupie]

Well,

You know, there are many people who, for whatever reason, need to pretend to be something they are not. You see them in bars. The fellow who claims to be a Vietnam Veteran who, when asked his age, ends up being in gradeschool at the wars end. Or the person who pretends to be a member of Special Forces, who when asked where the mess hall is located at one of the many posts they supposedly trained at, gives you a blank look and the B.S. excuse-"oh, what I did was classified".

This person who claims to be an "NSA Agent", or employee, is one of these people. He/she is a sad, and typical example of a fraud who needs to use, and lay claim to the hard work and intelligence of others in order to boost their nearly non-existent self worth to a point where they somehow, some way, can get the approval they so desperately need, yet never have. But in the end, this futile charade still boils down to one word-FRAUD.

 

[T.A.M.]

Well,

You know, there are many people who, for whatever reason, need to pretend to be something they are not. You see them in bars. The fellow who claims to be a Vietnam Veteran who, when asked his age, ends up being in gradeschool at the wars end. Or the person who pretends to be a member of Special Forces, who when asked where the mess hall is located at one of the many posts they supposedly trained at, gives you a blank look and the B.S. excuse-"oh, what I did was classified".

This person who claims to be an "NSA Agent", or employee, is one of these people. He/she is a sad, and typical example of a fraud who needs to use, and lay claim to the hard work and intelligence of others in order to boost their nearly non-existent self worth to a point where they somehow, some way, can get the approval they so desperately need, yet never have. But in the end, this futile charade still boils down to one word-FRAUD.

like I said, he needs help.

TAM

 

[tsig]

How many facts do i have to post before you will be mature enough to admit you are wrong and i am who i say i am?

One would be enough if it were true.

 

[tsig]

Good lord, how old are you?

Want to meet by the bicycle racks after school now?

Are you so afraid to back up your posts? Poor Roger...

His continued use of the word "mature" tells me he has age issues.

 

[TJM]

His continued use of the word "mature" tells me he has age issues.

Were it only that issue. You can have another 2000 post thread on the other issues I've noticed.

 

[ULTIMA1]

You said the NTSB had to do a report. It is the FBI investigation.

The NTSB has to investigate and do reports on all aircraft crashes if its a crime or not.

NTSB does not do criminal investigations. The NTSB does not have to report.

See answer above.

The NTSB did not do an investigation into 911, the FBI did.

See answer above.

Wrong; 800 was an accident.

But it was originally considered a crime and as shown there were criminal investigations done.

 

[ULTIMA1]

In this forum the unwritten rule seems to be that if one is proven wrong he admits his error/mistake, and moves on. No need to leave the forum.

Don't you think this is a better idea?

No, if i have people leave then others with closed minds my start to realize they need to wake up and face reallity.

 

[ULTIMA1]

So you admit that you've seen said CRITIC. Correct? And what is this qualifier "repeated from the public internet" supposed to change?

I was quoting from the internet, i have read the Critic but cannot quote from it since it is classified.

However, common sense would suggest that a sovereign nation and its agents don't prance about revealing secret information.

Well thats why if you read my post i have filed a FOIA request for a declassified copy to post.

 

[ULTIMA1]

You were discussing the contents of a NSA CRITIC - a document you claim is classified.

No, iwas quoting formf the public internet about what i supposed to be in the Critic.

I cannot quote form the Critic since it is classified.

Are you permitted to discuss the contents of classified documents with people who do not have the appropriate clearances?

No, and I have not discussed the contents of the Critic, only whats stated about it on the public internet.

 

[ULTIMA1]

Nice dodge.

Absolute proof you are fraud. When someone challenges you with a way to prove beyond a doubt that you are who you say you are, you back out.

Its not my fault you and otheres are not mature or intelligent enough to figure out who i am form all the information i have posted. Seems you and other are afraid to admit that.

 

[JimBenArm]

I was quoting from the internet, i have read the Critic but cannot quote from it since it is classified.

But if the one on the internet is the same one as in the Critic, then how do we know which one you quoted from? Huh? How will your superiors know?
"Oh, I know that's what is in the classified document, but I wasn't quoting from that. I just was quoting from the internet, so it's okay."
Yeah, no problem!

Man, you are, by far, my favorite!

 

[lapman]

The NTSB has to investigate and do reports on all aircraft crashes if its a crime or not.

False. The NTSB only has to investigate accidents.

But it was originally considered a crime and as shown there were criminal investigations done.

False. The FBI was performing a parallel investigation to rule out a crime. The NTSB does not perform criminal investigation. Proof of this was in the very link that you provided. It specifically states that the NTSB is not setup for criminal investigations. Since I already posted this, you are lying. What a surprise.

 

[ULTIMA1]

I trust I've made my point to the rational, sane people in the thread. *bows*

No dice.

The sad part here is, you're preaching to the choir! We get it, the troll does not! Stop the feeding frenzy.

Sorry but i have to prove that there is a TS/SI clearence. I only hope you will be rational and sane enough to admit i have shown that there is a TS/SI clearence.

http://www.tscm.com/NSAsecmanual1.html
NSA Badges

Blue: Employees who are cleared to the SECRET level while awaiting completion of their processing for full (TS/SI) clearance.

 

[ULTIMA1]

One would be enough if it were true.

Well all you to do is have common snense and have basic intelligence to figure out all the information i have posted.

But sadly most poeple on here are either not smart enough or they are smart enough but they are not mature enough to admit i am who i say i am.

 

[ULTIMA1]

But if the one on the internet is the same one as in the Critic, then how do we know which one you quoted from? Huh? How will your superiors know?

How many times must i post this?

The actual Critic is not posted on the public internet, only some information on what is supposed to be in the contents of the Critic.

The actual Critic does not contain word for word whats the internet states.

 

[JimBenArm]

How about the ones of us who are smart enough, mature enough, and sexy enough to know you're not? Huh?
Forget about us, did you?

 

[JimBenArm]

How many times must i post this?

The actual Critic is not posted on the public internet, only some information on what is supposed to be in the contents of the Critic.

The actual Critic does not contain word for word whats the internet states.

Yes, of course.
Nice try.
Vanna has some lovely parting gifts.
Thanks for playing.

 

[ULTIMA1]

False. The NTSB only has to investigate accidents.

Please do some research befor posting about something its clear you know nothing about.

It specifically states that the NTSB is not setup for criminal investigations. Since I already posted this, you are lying. What a surprise.

Why are you lying? Anytime a crash is considered a crims the FBI and NTSB must investigate, please read the regualtions governing crash sites that are considered a crime.