Have you ignored every single post I've made in the past???
Go back and look. I've done enough work for you. If you want to invoke adulthood in your posts, practice some yourself. Go back and look. Do your own work. The links have been provided. You're the one ignoring the information.
For everyone else who wants to be serious about studying just some of the
real information regarding United Airlines 93, here it is. I'm no longer aiming this at Ultima since many links and sources of information have already been identified for him, only to be ignored. Which, by the way, is
not the sign of a serious researcher.
The
Moussaoui trial evidence site has many links to individual pieces of evidence regarding FL93, including but not limited to:
Somerset County Coroner Wallace Miller was reported to have identified victims. That office as well as the
Armed Forces Institute of Pathology participated in the victim identification. Should someone be serious about FOIA'ing them, and not just blowing smoke about it, those are two organizations that were involved and have information. Info for the AFIP can be found at the link above. Info for the Somerset County Coroner is available at
this site.
Tapes exist of NORAD/NEADS and FAA air traffic control conversations. They can be found at Vanity Fair's "
The NORAD Tapes" site, as well as at
9/11 Myths page on the same subject.
An NTSB report on the Flight Data Recorder can be found
here. And their flight path study can be found
here.
Eyewitness accounts have been centralized on
Mark Robert's Flight 93 page, along to links to originating articles or sources. Also, as secondary and tertiary sites citing sources and facts,
Mike's 911 Myths Flight 93 page as well as
Ref's covering the same contains valuable information. None of it is primary - Mike W. and Ref only gathered and republished information; they're not direct information sources on 9/11 itself - but it is still useful information for understanding the breadth of information available about FL93.
Note that this only scratches the surface. Best thing for you other readers is to start from
Mark Robert's site. None of it is primary information - like Mike W. and Ref, Mark had only gathered information from other sources, although that is invaluable in and of itself. But the worth of his site is that you know what those primary and secondary sources are, so you can query them directly.
Ultima has got to know this. But he'd rather take our refusal to do his work for him and insinuate the information doesn't exist to begin with. It does. Start from there, and the Moussaoui trial evidence, and the other link provided and go from there. While you're at it, go back through this thread and find any links to real information from Ultima; only ones I recall were to other conspiracy peddling sites, not to primary sources like the NTSB reports or the trial evidence like I've provided. Anyway, once you do that, you'll understand why we're so scornful of Ultima's ignorance on the topic. The information is there, but he refuses to acknowledge it. That's deliberate ignorance. And it's inexcusable.
