NSA Document Flight 93 intercepted coming soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
JoeyDonuts said:
2. There is no such thing as a TS/SI clearance.
Click to expand...

What a bold face lie. Becasue if the isn't then Sabrina is also lieing about her clearence.


3. There would be no need for an analyst to be read into six compartments. Hell, I don't even think the agency that grants clearances administers six different progams. Given the NSA's mission there are only two an analyst would need.
Click to expand...

Thanks for showing again you do not have a clue what you are talking about.
Click to expand...
 
Reheat said:
Correct! It's not even in contention any more. There is NO WAY this idiot has a Security Clearance of any kind. It is not even a remote possibility...
Click to expand...

Thanks again for showing you hvsae no clue what you are talking about.

ETA: I will not be identified as a stalker, but if someone wants to call Roger Misner in New Oxford, PA, his telephone number is readily available from virtually all of the Residential Search Engines on the 'net. Maybe that would help to put this total waste of time, bandwidth and idiocy to rest.....
Click to expand...


People on here will not call first that are immmature and second they would be afraid to admit i am who i say i am, that would cause thieir whole safe little fantasy world to collapse.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
You have no real evidence to support this.



Supposed killing of pilots, no real evidence of that.




You mean nothing that has been released yet.



Please show the NTSB report that matches parts found matching the plane.
We have DNA in the hole.



You only think you have evidence but you do not have all the real evidence and official reports. If so you should have shown it by now.
Click to expand...
And you have absolutely nothing but a fictitious claim. The FOIA response is meaningless since it doesn't acknowledge that the info you claim is on there is actually there. The ATC tapes with the sound of the pilots being attacked is public. The ATC tapes with the hijackers stating that they are in control of the aircraft is public.

So, what was your response from the FBI for your FOIA request for the NTSB report?
 
Sabrina said:
This thread should have rightfully died a merciful death ages ago, and we are all guilty of keeping it going, myself included.
Click to expand...

You only want the thread closed because like all beleivers you are afraid of the truth, it would wreak your little safe fantasy world.


Ultima has been proven over and over again to be a liar and a troll spamming this website for his own twisted amusement,
Click to expand...

The only thing you hvae proven is that you do not the the bassic common snense or basic intelligence to figure out who i am and where i work.


Is it possible to request that a thread be closed due to lack of content? Because if so, this thread certainly qualifies, if you ask me. Anyone know the answer?
Click to expand...

You only want the thread closed because like all beleivers you are afraid of the truth, it would wreak your little safe fantasy world.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Wrong again, actually it was considered a crime twice. it was originally thought that a bomb blew up the plane. Later on witnesses came forward and brought up about seeing a missile.

Do you not consider a report on a missile and explosive residue a criminal report? If not please explain why.
Click to expand...
Did you not read the report? It specifically states that there was no evidence of a bomb or missile. Therefore, the report was not a criminal investigation, but an accident investigation and the jurisdiction was given to the NTSB. That is why it is on the NTSB site. So, flight 800 does not qualify. Next.
 
Roger.
?
1. You claimed to have read the classified version of the critic. Yes or no?

2. You claimed that this critic states that flight 93 was shot down. Yes or no?

(we have to take baby steps)
 
Dog Town said:
Oooh, this is a dance U1 has got down! Sadly for him, it's Elaine's foot work from Seinfeld!:D
Click to expand...
I know. The thing is that it could only be a CRITIC with the 9/11 date. Or 9/11 and flight 93. There is no real indication that it was a perfect match.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
You only want the thread closed because like all beleivers[sic] you are afraid of the truth, it would wreak[sic] your little safe fantasy world.




The only thing you hvae[sic] proven is that you do not[sic] the the bassic[sic] common snense [sic] or basic intelligence[uh...what?] to figure out who i am and where i work.




You only want the thread closed because like all beleivers [sic] you are afraid of the truth, it would wreak[sic] your little safe fantasy world.
Click to expand...

Roger... can I have your superiors contact information? I will call him.
 
Last edited:
ULTIMA1 said:
I only respond to mature, researched post, not just B.S. posted by someone who has no clue of what they are talking about.
Click to expand...
Please point out where I was immature. Also, what "research" would you suggest I should have done? I simply ask you to compare and contrast two options and tell me which one you'd choose.

Not sure what B.S. I posted either. I'm asking you a question based on information I've been taught at the 100 or so security briefings I've attended at work.

I personally think you're just dodging my question.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
I hate to tell you but both flight 800 and the plane crashes on 9/11 are both considered crimes.
Click to expand...

Flight 800

On November 18, 1997, it [The FBI] announced that no evidence had been found of a criminal act and the NTSB assumed sole control on the investigation.
Click to expand...

The NTSB investigation considered the possibility that a bomb or missile caused the mishap, but found no evidence to support such a theory.
Click to expand...

I don't know. Just in case you don't mind facts obstructing your arguments.
 
Last edited:
Let me guess, people... Ultima's repeating the same old claims, he's still saying he hasn't been given the information he's been asking for, and he's ignoring it when we do link information contradicting his stuff.

Seriously... ignore is your friend in this case. All people have to do is look at past pages to see his case get shredded (granted, they have to wade through a lot of insults and pointless posts to see it, but it's there). Put him on ignore. He's got nothing. We've already exposed his claims. Just let it go. He's got nothing.
 
ElMondoHummus said:
Seriously... ignore is your friend in this case. All people have to do is look at past pages to see his case get shredded (granted, they have to wade through a lot of insults and pointless posts to see it, but it's there). Put him on ignore. He's got nothing. We've already exposed his claims. Just let it go. He's got nothing.
Click to expand...

I promise to. Not only will I not reply to him directly, I won't even post in threads he's started...after this one, of course. I share your sentiment. 1,818 posts and we're still "debating" the existence of a document promised to us "soon" almost seven months ago.
 
Last edited:
ElMondoHummus said:
Let me guess, people... Ultima's repeating the same old claims, he's still saying he hasn't been given the information he's been asking for, and he's ignoring it when we do link information contradicting his stuff.

Seriously... ignore is your friend in this case. All people have to do is look at past pages to see his case get shredded (granted, they have to wade through a lot of insults and pointless posts to see it, but it's there). Put him on ignore. He's got nothing. We've already exposed his claims. Just let it go. He's got nothing.
Click to expand...


ultima.jpg


Ah, sweet bliss.

And yes, sometimes I read stupid UFO websites linked on this forum and haven't found the perfect grilled shrimp recipe yet. Wanna make something of it? :mad:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom