NSA Document Flight 93 intercepted coming soon

[ULTIMA1]

I have had a look at his USAF papers. Look OK to me but I would like to know what aircraft and squadron he worked on during his time and for how long.

Also he claims to have been a police officer for 12 amount of years as well. I would like to know where and when.

I was at RAF Alconbury from 1981 to 1983 and was a crew chief on the RF4-C in the 1st TRW.

I was at Reese AFB from 1983 to 1985 and was crew chief on the T-38A in the 64th OMS.

I was a federal police officer for 12 years, from 1986 to 1998 at NSA. I can post my crertificate from the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center.

 

[Bobby]

Fair enough, but he does seem to draw the crowds!



But it seems the crowds may have scared him off before he answered my questions!

Think the same happened to me in the setiforums, politics, 9/11 Anomalies thread. The main twoofer there has been MIA for the past couple of weeks.

 

[ULTIMA1]

Bearing in mind that in actuality I work for a private consulting firm that does contracts with US government agencies, I would like to address Ultima's claim that him saying he's an NSA analyst does not violate any rules of OPSEC. He's wrong.

There is nothing wrong with stating i work for NSA. As long as i do not go into specifics of the work i do or post things that are classified.

I have not posted much more then can be found on the NSA public website.

 

[ULTIMA1]

your linked FOIA request lists you as an outsider. Interesting.

Maybe because i sent the FOIA from home (not from work) so i coud post it online to show i did make the request.

Then i show the letter stating that the document i asked has been found and will be sent.

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

Then i show the letter stating that the document i asked has been found and will be sent.

Why not just wait until you actually received the document? What good did you think posting this would serve?

 

[ULTIMA1]

Why not just wait until you actually received the document? What good did you think posting this would serve?

Showing people that i have information coming that does officially contradict the official story.

 

[Zipster]

There is nothing wrong with stating i work for NSA. As long as i do not go into specifics of the work i do or post things that are classified.

I have not posted much more then can be found on the NSA public website.

I do remember you telling me you analyze intelligence on foreign aircraft and the such. That's probably more specific than the NSA wants the public to know about what you do. Even if that was a cover, it's a pretty bad one to use...

 

[ULTIMA1]

I do remember you telling me you analyze intelligence on foreign aircraft and the such. ...

Please go the NSA site and read what it states.

http://www.nsa.gov/about/about00003.cfm

 

[T.A.M.]

As for the rest of this "bluster", Let me know when CNN broadcasts,

"NSA Analyst blows lid off government version of the 9/11 attacks"

Until then, this particularly ridiculous truther is going in the ignore column.

TAM

 

[Zipster]

Please go the NSA site and read what it states. ...

"Intelligence" on foreign aircraft can include radio chatter and the such can it not? Wouldn't intercepting and analyzing said aircraft radio traffic fall under the SIGINT mission?

 

[LashL]

Maybe because i sent the FOIA from home (not from work) so i coud post it online to show i did make the request.

Then i show the letter stating that the document i asked has been found and will be sent.

No, you have not shown any such thing.

You have not posted your FOIA request, nor have you posted the response you allegedly received. All you have posted so far is a partial page from a purported response to some request or another, and not a single word of your alleged request.

Please post your actual request in its entirety (with your personal information redacted, of course) and the response you allegedly received in its entirety (again, with your personal information redacted, of course).

Unless and until you do that, frankly, this thread is a complete and utter waste of time and bandwidth.

ETA: And I hope that my fellow forumites can and will refrain from doling out troll kibble in the interim. Seriously, folks.

 

[ULTIMA1]

No, you have not shown any such thing.

You have not posted your FOIA request, nor have you posted the response you allegedly received. All you have posted so far is a partial page from a purported response to some request or another, and not a single word of your alleged request.
.

Can you even read?

The letter i posted states what my request was and states that they found the reqested document.

 

[LashL]

The letter i posted states what my request was and states that they found the reqested document.

No, it does not. It says nothing of the sort. I am intimately familiar with FOIA requests and I am intimately familiar with drafting responses to them, so don't even go there.

As I said:

You have not posted your FOIA request, nor have you posted the response you allegedly received. All you have posted so far is a partial page from a purported response to some request or another, and not a single word of your alleged request.

Please post your actual request in its entirety (with your personal information redacted, of course) and the response you allegedly received in its entirety (again, with your personal information redacted, of course).

Unless and until you do that, frankly, this thread is a complete and utter waste of time and bandwidth.

 

[Totovader]

Similarly, I would like my questions answered as well...

How is that supposed to confirm you actually have this document in the first place- and that you've seen information which is supposed to be interesting?

It doesn't. You said you had seen proof that the government was lying about this event, and that you would be able to provide proof of that. In order to confirm the first part of your story, you should be able to quote the relevant passages.

Otherwise, what are we supposed to believe about your credibility? You have an opportunity here to demolish your critics- and you're going to pass it up?

Quote the relevant passages so we can match it up with the document you claim will be arriving- otherwise expect that you won't be taken seriously at all.

 

[ULTIMA1]

No, it does not. It says nothing of the sort. .

Now lets look at the letter shall we.
[qimg]http://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n268/phixer6/911/FLI93-2.jpg?t=1222974166[/qimg]

The first paragraph states that on 18 August 2008 i requested a declassified copy of the Critic meassage and any follow up reports on the interception of FLight 93.

CAN YOU SEE THAT IN THE LETTER, YES or NO ?

 

[LashL]

Now lets look at the letter shall we.

As I said, you have not posted your FOIA request, nor have you posted the response you allegedly received. All you have posted so far is a partial page from a purported response to some request or another, and not a single word of your alleged request.

Please post your actual request in its entirety (with your personal information redacted, of course) and the response you allegedly received in its entirety (again, with your personal information redacted, of course).

Unless and until you do that, frankly, this thread is a complete and utter waste of time and bandwidth. And troll kibble.

 

[ULTIMA1]

As I said, you have not posted your FOIA request, nor have you posted the response you allegedly received. .

You can read can't you? You do see the letter is a repsonse to a FOIA request from NSA? You can see that the request i made is in the first paragraph of the letter?

The first paragraph states that on 18 August 2008 i requested a declassified copy of the Critic meassage and any follow up reports on the interception of FLight 93.

CAN YOU SEE THAT IN THE LETTER, YES or NO ?

 

[Zipster]

I think was LashL is asking for is the original FOIA form you filled out, minus any personal information you see fit not to release to the public.

Do you still have that? If yes, then post it so that the first of LashL's request can be laid to rest.

 

[ULTIMA1]

I think was LashL is asking for is the original FOIA form you filled out, minus any personal information you see fit not to release to the public.
.

Problem is the letter states exactly what the FOIA requested.

But if they have to have it here it is, hope it makes them happy.

FOIA request‏
From:
Sent: Sat 8/16/08 11:08 PM
To: foianet@nsa.gov

PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT: Authority for collecting information requested is contained in 5 U.S.C. § 552a and 5 U.S.C. § 552. NSA's Blanket Routine Uses found at 58 Fed. Reg. 10,531 (1993) as well as the specific uses found in GNSA02, GNSA03, and GNSA10 apply to this information. Authority for requesting your Social Security Number (SSN) is Executive Order 9397. The requested information will be used to assist the Agency in locating and disseminating the applicable records to the requestor. The disclosure of the requested information, to include your SSN, is voluntary. However, failure to provide the requested information may delay the processing of your request.


Full name:

Company/Organization: NSA

Address

Home Phone:

Work Phone:

Description of the records you seek: I would like to get a declassified copy of the CRITIC messages and any follow up reports from September 11, 2001 of the interception of Flight 93.

 

[chillzero]

Moving some posts to AAH. Please remember your MA. Do not attack individuals. Discuss or attack the issues presented.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero