NSA Document Flight 93 intercepted coming soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
roundhead said:
My guess is that this is disinfo.

I find it hard to believe a plane was shot down when one didnt crash there, from impact, shootdown, or anything else.
Click to expand...

Well the document is real and would hold up in court.

It states that Flight 93 was intercepted, follow up reports suggest a fighter came back without a missile. Thats why i asked for follow up reports.
 
16.5 said:
Interesting.

It does appear that the NSA does indeed have responsive documents.

If they had none they would have sent another form letter saying that they had none.

Plus it would have went into the "Super Easy" category. Yes they have a "super easy" category. This is not in that category.

Here is a link to the NSA FOIA guidelines that seem to back up some of the OP's claims:

http://www.nsa.gov/foia/foia00011.pdf

So, time to go back and edit my previous posts!

Mwhahahaha!
Click to expand...


Oh it's obvious something is coming. Even the government doesn't like paperwork enough to say "we don't have much, we'll send it soon" just to send another letter saying "no documents found." :p
 
dtugg said:
What facts?

And no, I do not believe everything that the media tells me. But when what they says is backed by ALL the available evidence, yes I do tend to believe it.
Click to expand...

The fact that this document is real and would hold up in court.

What real evidence has the media produced?
 
Is this new evidence earth-shattering? Will it totally rock my world? Will it make me want to wail in agony over the loss of the last seven years?

Or will I just get another laugh at the expense of another truther?

Time will tell. However, I know what I'm betting on, and I haven't lost yet.
 
None of these claims matter. For one, we haven't seen the document yet. On top of that, any such claim that an interception and shootdown occurred contradicts the already established physical evidence as well as the radar data (as Beechnut pointed out) and the CVR. Until we see the document and are given a chance to see what it indicates, any claims that the "official story" is contradicted are premature.

Evidence first. Then conclusions.
 
Last edited:
ULTIMA1 said:
Well if you would have read the letter you would see that i asked for a declassified version of the document.
Click to expand...

sorry for asking but, will that be the same document as the classified one? just not classified anymore? or will they partially declassify it? What i mean is, will it contain the same information as the classified one? i am kinda confudes with "decassified version."
 
JimBenArm said:
Or will I just get another laugh at the expense of another truther?
.
Click to expand...


Time will also tell who is adult enough to admit when the document is posted and who will still be living in a fantasy world afraid to face reallity.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
The fact that this document is real and would hold up in court.

What real evidence has the media produced?
Click to expand...


You mean the document that you admit in your OP you have not received yet? How could you possibly know what it says?

The media hasn't really produced any evidence, they just reported it. I have yet to see how any significant part of the evidence that they report is not true. Maybe you can help me out.
 
Last edited:
ULTIMA1 said:
The fact that this document is real and would hold up in court.
Click to expand...


So, you've obtained a legal analysis of the document you read illegally? The legal analyst was ok with committing a felony by reading a classified document?


What real evidence has the media produced?
Click to expand...


None. That's not their job.

How much research and investigation have you done that has not involved your keyboard, YouTube or Google?
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Time will also tell who is adult enough to admit when the document is posted and who will still be living in a fantasy world afraid to face reallity.
Click to expand...
Oh, I can't wait. This one is going to be especially good.

Lyte Bryte II!
 
No way this dude works for the NSA....no way.
They would put his butt on a plane to gitmo quicker than spit!
 
Dictator Cheney said:
sorry for asking but, will that be the same document as the classified one? just not classified anymore? or will they partially declassify it? What i mean is, will it contain the same information as the classified one? i am kinda confudes with "decassified version."
Click to expand...

Yes, it will be the same document, they will just black out or take out the few sentences that are classified.

Now unless they rule that the document is old enough that their is nothing classifeid in it anymore then they will release the whole document.
 
doobiedoright said:
No way this dude works for the NSA....no way.
They would put his butt on a plane to gitmo quicker than spit!
Click to expand...

Why, i have not posted anything that is classified.

There are media sources that have spoken about the document also, are you going to send them to gitmo too?
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Time will also tell who is adult enough to admit when the document is posted and who will still be living in a fantasy world afraid to face reallity.
Click to expand...


I absolutely will. Everyone here knows I'm back on the CT bus the SECOND someone provides me a reason to which doesn't make me feel as stupid as my first go-round forever will.





cricket.gif
 
Last edited:
ULTIMA1 said:
Yes, it will be the same document, they will just black out or take out the few sentences that are classified.

Now unless they rule that the document is old enough that their is nothing classifeid in it anymore then they will release the whole document.
Click to expand...

thank you :)

i am looking forward for this document. While i fear the intersting parts would be the blackedout ones :(
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Not really as stated i have read the document.
Click to expand...


You know you're admitting to a felony if you claim (and it's true) that you've read a classified document without authorization, don't you? And as far as its probative value in court, is that your legal opinion; and what gives you the standing to determine its use in a court of law? If you're not a qualified legal analyst, how did you determine the document would "stand up in a court of law"?
 
Last edited:
Mince said:
You know you're admitting to a felony if you claim (and it's true) that you've read a classified document without authorization, don't you?
Click to expand...

I have authorization to read it.

Its also been mentioned by a few media groups.

I have a background in law enforcement so i know a litlte about what can be used in court.
 
Horatius said:
I'm willing to bet 10 Ameros that, if any document shows up that actually says anything about intercepting in relation to Flight 93, it will be about intercepting radio communications. This interpretation would seem to be consistent with the quality of his interpretation of the letter he already posted.

Any takers?
Click to expand...

It would also be consistent with what the NSA does for a living.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom