NSA Document Flight 93 intercepted coming soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
ULTIMA1 said:
Well if you would have read the letter you will see that i asked for a declassifed version to post.
Click to expand...
right. Because you're afraid to expose the classified version... why?

When the FOIA returns to you empty, what will you do? Claim you really, really did see the classified version that exposes the official story as a hoax, but refuse to publish it because its "classified"?
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Well if you would have read the letter you will see that i asked for a declassifed version to post.
Click to expand...

So the government is going to give you a declassified document proving that the story that they give is a lie? Right. I'll believe it when I see it.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
This contridicts the official story that no planes were near Flight 93.
Click to expand...

Well nice to see you change your spin on the document. For so long we have been hearing from you how this will "prove Flight 93 was intercepted and shot down" making the official story wrong.

I look forward to your insulting troll posts where you call everyone who disagrees with you immature.

Yay.

BTW, wouldn't proof that the plane was actually shot down blow all the other 9/11 inside job conspiracy theories away?
 
And ULTIMA1 fails to see that even if (a big if) flight 93 was shot down, there would be no reason to cover it up. Seeing that we've already had 3 planes crashed into buildings, and they realized a fourth one was hijacked, the alert would have been out to find the plane since it would have been believed that its mission would also to crash into a building. Which one? who knows. But the precedent was already there.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
But i do know what i says. I have read the document, thats why i filed a FOIA to get it.
Click to expand...

You'll have to pardon our skepticism over you maaaaybe not reading it right the first time, but we go by evidence here and your interpretation of the letter you posted in the OP does present a tiny credibility issue.

But that's OK, when you get the real document post it here and it'll prove a shoot-down and we'll all be like "woah, this IS real evidence." And the entire community will jump all over your bandwagon because we've been DYING for any shred of real evidence since the very first 9/11 CT was presented and six years later we're getting pretty annoyed with the wait.

And when none of this happens, at least you'll be able to comfort yourself in the delusion we're really not skeptics and the reason we all laughed heartily at what you wound up getting is because that's what sheep do and not because it said the opposite of what you thought it did. ;)
 
dtugg said:
So the government is going to give you a declassified document proving that the story that they give is a lie? Right. I'll believe it when I see it.
Click to expand...


Well facts are facts.

DO you believe everything the media tells you?
 
Drudgewire said:
but we go by evidence here and your interpretation of the letter you posted in the OP does present a tiny credibility issue.
Click to expand...

I have stated what is in the letter.

I asked for a specific Critic from 9/11 (the only one posted that day) and they found it.
 
I'm willing to bet 10 Ameros that, if any document shows up that actually says anything about intercepting in relation to Flight 93, it will be about intercepting radio communications. This interpretation would seem to be consistent with the quality of his interpretation of the letter he already posted.

Any takers?
 
Last edited:
ULTIMA1 - I await your answer: if the FOIA comes back empty, will you expose the classified doc, or hide behind the fact that its classified?
 
Horatius said:
I'm willing to bet 10 Ameros that, if any document shows up that actually says anything about intercepting in relation to Flight 93, that it will be about intercepting radio communications
Any takers?
Click to expand...



I thnk you might want to reread the letter.
 
Interesting.

It does appear that the NSA does indeed have responsive documents.

If they had none they would have sent another form letter saying that they had none.

Plus it would have went into the "Super Easy" category. Yes they have a "super easy" category. This is not in that category.

Here is a link to the NSA FOIA guidelines that seem to back up some of the OP's claims:

http://www.nsa.gov/foia/foia00011.pdf

So, time to go back and edit my previous posts!

Mwhahahaha!
 
Last edited:
madurobob said:
ULTIMA1 - I await your answer: if the FOIA comes back empty, will you expose the classified doc, or hide behind the fact that its classified?
Click to expand...

Why would the FOIA come back empty when they have already stated they have what i asked for?


Please reread the letter or have someone read it for you so you can understand it.
 
madurobob said:
ULTIMA1 - I await your answer: if the FOIA comes back empty, will you expose the classified doc, or hide behind the fact that its classified?
Click to expand...

correct me if i am wrong, but i doubt you can FOIA a classified document. and when they do give it out, would that not mean it is atleast then declassified?
 
My guess is that this is disinfo.

I find it hard to believe a plane was shot down when one didnt crash there, from impact, shootdown, or anything else.
 
Dictator Cheney said:
correct me if i am wrong, but i doubt you can FOIA a classified document. and when they do give it out, would that not mean it is atleast then declassified?
Click to expand...

Well if you would have read the letter you would see that i asked for a declassified version of the document.
 
Arus808 said:
And ULTIMA1 fails to see that even if (a big if) flight 93 was shot down, there would be no reason to cover it up. Seeing that we've already had 3 planes crashed into buildings, and they realized a fourth one was hijacked, the alert would have been out to find the plane since it would have been believed that its mission would also to crash into a building. Which one? who knows. But the precedent was already there.
Click to expand...


The whole conspiracy basically boils down to "we tell the world we gave permission to shoot down the plane, but then we'll REALLY SHOOT DOWN THE PLANE AND SAY WE DIDN'T!"

:explode
 
Dictator Cheney said:
correct me if i am wrong, but i doubt you can FOIA a classified document.
Click to expand...


Nor can you read a classified document without authorization; making ULTIMA1's claims to have read such a document very dubious. If he did read a classified document without authorization, he is a felon...and a self-confessed felon.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Well facts are facts.

DO you believe everything the media tells you?
Click to expand...

What facts?

And no, I do not believe everything that the media tells me. But when what they says is backed by ALL the available evidence, yes I do tend to believe it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom