November Stundie Nominations

Are youtube-comments eligible for nomination? Then I have a fine one at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8Y4CB2ReUo
Comment by ThePeage just before noon (UT) on november 10th.

The topic is "Did the Harrit paper get published with or without proper peer review at Bentham Publishers?" Here is a suggestion on how to find out:

ThePeage said:
...Have you contacted Benthams?

When I did, they were very polite. They didn't say "that paper should not have been published" or "it was sneaked in". I wonder why? All you have to do is contact Benthams and ask them if the paper was correctly processed - that is all you have to do. The only reason I can imagine for your reluctance is that you are scared to have your precious belief shattered. To coin a phrase: Just do it!
Click to expand...

Yeah, right! And all the police and the judge have to do is ask the suspect if he dunnit. Just ask! :D
 
Last edited:
Oystein said:
Yeah, right! And all the police and the judge have to do is ask the suspect if he dunnit. Just ask! :D
Click to expand...

The double standard implicit in that is quite mind-boggling, given that it's presumably being said by someone who believes that the US government, NYPD, FDNY, FBI, CIA, NIST, FEMA, Ove Arup, Edinburgh University, Purdue University, Bazant, Loiseaux, Silverstein and Cheney are all liars.

Dave
 
Dave Rogers said:
The double standard implicit in that is quite mind-boggling, given that it's presumably being said by someone who believes that the US government, NYPD, FDNY, FBI, CIA, NIST, FEMA, Ove Arup, Edinburgh University, Purdue University, Bazant, Loiseaux, Silverstein and Cheney are all liars.

Dave
Click to expand...

Yep. I challenged the guy back to ask NIST if their WTC studies were solid, conclusive and trustworthy.
 
Watch out if you're a lady, the scanners at airports are gonna make you infertile and the whole world is gonna die out,maybe.
http://www.infowars.com/pilots-association-urges-airline-pilots-to-opt-out-of-tsa-naked-body-scanners/

Real Guardian Angel Reply:
November 9th, 2010 at 12:32 pm

Dentists cover us with lead blankets and always need to know if there is a pregnancy because a simple tooth x-ray can damage a forming fetus and create deformities. Women should never carry their cell phones in their pants pockets. Ultra sound waves can damage a forming fetus’s ears. They should only be taken after the sensitive organs are formed.

Ovaries and eggs are not reparable or regeneratable.

I’M SURE THAT IS WHY THEY LOVE THE SCANNERS. DEPOPULATION.

IF YOU CAN KILL ALL HER EGGS BEFORE OVULATION YOU DON’T NEED FORCED ABORTION OR ONE CHILD POLICIES…AND THE PEOPLE CAN THINK THEY ARE FREE TO CHOOSE….
Click to expand...
 
Loss Leader said:
I'd just like to address an important issue that has been overlooked: Christina Hendricks.

She combines both the insane model hotness of Morena Baccarin with the approachable girl-next-door possibleness of Jewel Staite.

True, Our Mrs. Reynolds is a little more likely to cause you to die than Inara or Kaylee, but I think that only adds to her charm.
Click to expand...

ElMondoHummus said:
How? Christina Hendricks has nothing to do with Firefly. :confused:
Click to expand...


Shameful... truely shameful.

Thus completes ElMondoHummus' hat trick of noms.
 
Some interesting planetary information courtesy of the icke forum
from mrerisian
I've heard it's actually a lot weirder...

The Truth Behind Eris, Planet X and Pluto.

- The planet Eris is in fact made of pure gold.

- Its shape is closer to that of an apple than a planet.

- There is evidence to suggest it is artificial.

- It has the word "Kallista" written on it. This word is a girl's name which, roughly translated means "most beautiful".

Why is all of this being kept secret?

- The UN is currently arguing about who owns Eris. This argument could easily descend into a third world war. The obvious value of a planet made of gold is only part of the controversey.

- Pluto was the original "final planet". It's status has recently been discredited. This was seen as a bit of a snub for America who had claimed it as their own.

- The dispute at the UN revolves around claims this planet is articificial and therefore a "gift from God". Clearly the present is intended for "the most beautiful" country. Most political commentators believe the only way to sort out who that is will be a massive fight.

This is all highly top secret complex stuff. I suggest you research it before spouting off on a public forum about it. WW3 is coming.
Click to expand...

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=143598
 
- The UN is currently arguing about who owns Eris. This argument could easily descend into a third world war. The obvious value of a planet made of gold is only part of the controversey.
Click to expand...

$0.001 per ton is my guess.
 
I nominate Ergo (he really is the gift that keeps on giving) for this gem
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6535933&postcount=44

ergo said:
No, I'm saying that very basic questions arise from simply looking at the collapses. Questions which should be able to be answered without having to allude to hidden, "inner" processes which defy everyday, intuitive understanding of gravity and Newtonian physics.
Click to expand...

This from someone who has no grasp of basic physics (look at his arguments from incredulity about how "loose particles" can't harm solids....

Or his "moon sized" pile of rubble not being able to crush down the towers

and he talks about the need to have something that doesn't require
without having to allude to hidden, "inner" processes
Click to expand...

nanothermite?
ninjaneers?
massive conspiracy yet no one talks?

Really?
 
Taken from World Freeman Society (cheating I know the entire site is a stundie :D)
http://forum.worldfreemansociety.org/viewtopic.php?f=43&t=7731&start=20
*yawns at troll* look to the source of a right where does that lead you? force. who must yield to your "right" to life? thanks for proving the source of rights.
your question here is illogical. you can ask for another explanation but its unlikely ill respond to your next troll query. unless you can somehow convince or impress me with a little bit of intelligence.

truth can be described as point A and an untruth is everything else, which does not create a point B. learn physics?

how does physics apply to truth or rights? if you cant understand then i suggest you go study. others seem to get it why cant you? i have no obligation to explain truth to you, and in fact, my understanding in no way can affect your understanding of it even if i explain so you must get off your behind and start paving the way for your own intelligence. or ask me really nicely:) or find something like the matrix that can download info to your brain muahaha.

dont understand? dont worry:) you obviously dont care anyways or you would investigate what it means to love instead of trolling with senseless questions that have no real purpose besides being a troll.

does nothing i say make sense or is this a vague query list you conjured up determined to entice negative emotions?

define freedom of ability.... what is wrong with your fingers you typed out this whole troll query, you can go look it up as well can you not? on a scale of 1 to 10 how lazy are you?

the reason there is truth is so entities can come to logical agreement, do you see any indication of force in the words freedom of ability? i dont see an opposite involved here.

have a great day! =D

p.s. if you simply must dissect this reply make sure to come up with valid points of discussion instead of silly unarranged jargon of nonsensical ********. thanks.
Click to expand...
 
I nominate this picture:

128888103486002222.jpg
 
jargon buster said:
Just read this
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=142608
The judge now has to offer remedy or he is in dishonour; to avoid providing remedy and his own dishonour, he will leave the court. Whilst he has gone he does something in the background (In all likeliness a Masonic Ritual Prayer) When he comes back into court, he comes back in honour to regain jurisdiction under Maritime Admiralty Law.
Click to expand...

I dont really know where to start with that.
Click to expand...

Actually, the judge leaves the courtroom to call for backup for the bailiffs, because he knows he's probably going to have to throw the nutcase in jail for contempt.
 
PixyMisa said:
I have just now decided that the correct expression for fixing the spelling or formatting of a logically incoherent post should be "putting lipstick on a deckchair".
Click to expand...
This sounds like a Dilbert management meeting. :D
 
Circumcision part of a world domination plot

the tragedy is that these very same entities are using manipulative methods to advance the cause and state of Israel. We are being manipulated to believe that any discussion or restraint on the state of Israel is a defamation of a religion!! The following methods/ events have been used to protect this powerful command group.
sprayed chem-trails
DTV transmission
water fluoridation
global warming scare tactics
proliferation of electronic banking
the "death" of prize race horses ae.(Phar Lap, and Shergar)
ancient astronaut theory denial
subliminal messaging
newborn circumcision
strong evidence of a Zionist conspiracy to relate anti-zionism with anti-semitism.
Click to expand...

Source: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=191314
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom