November Stundie Nominations

240-185 said:
I nominate this picture:

[qimg]http://failblog.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/128888103486002222.jpg[/qimg]
Has anyone noticed how windy has been lately? I think it has to do with all those windmills. Perhaps they were wired incorrectly so instead of using wind to produce electricity, they are using electricity to produce wind. This should be investigated ASAP.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Travis, you can close the thread now.


And the Stundies.


Forever.
 
Oystein said:
Are youtube-comments eligible for nomination?(snip)

...

(snip)Yeah, right! And all the police and the judge have to do is ask the suspect if he dunnit. Just ask! :D
Click to expand...


Well, that certainly would go a long way toward alleviating the jail over-crowding problem. :D
 
1337m4n said:
Source: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=191314The following methods/ events have been used to protect this powerful command group.
sprayed chem-trails
DTV transmission
water fluoridation
global warming scare tactics
proliferation of electronic banking
the "death" of prize race horses ae.(Phar Lap, and Shergar)
ancient astronaut theory denial
subliminal messaging
newborn circumcision
strong evidence of a Zionist conspiracy to relate anti-zionism with anti-semitism.
Click to expand...

Come on 1337, you picked circumcision as the most woo-ish in that list?

DTV transmission,,,,, race horse deaths,,,,,, both gotta be just as parawooI claim copyright on this as a short form of 'paranoid woo' as your pick.
 
Longfellow said:
Well, that certainly would go a long way toward alleviating the jail over-crowding problem. :D
Click to expand...

It seems to me we already ask the question "how do you plead?".

So it should go like this;

Judge: How does the accused plead?
Accused: Not guilty your Honour.
Judge: Case dismissed. Next!

WoW!! would that ever speed things up a lot.

To further speed things up and satisfy the extreme right wing , if the answer, for some odd reason, is "Guilty your Honour.", the accused is immediatly taken out back and shot in the back of the head with no disticntion in regards to the crime.

Think of it. No jails, no recitivism and one Judge could hear 200-300 cases per day.
Won't happen though, lawyers would starve.:D
 
Another classic Jack White:

Jim's logic is impeccable. It may be too difficult for some to understand,
BUT WHETHER THE FILM IS REAL OR FAKE IS NOT IMPORTANT under
Jim's analysis. If it is real it proves Apollo fakery. If it is fake it proves Apollo
fakery. Am I right, Jim?
Click to expand...

Heads you win, tails I lose, eh Jack?

http://www.deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/showpost.php?p=27206&postcount=28

(Warning: extended viewing of the subject forum can lead to dementia)
 
Architect said:
How mental do you have to be if even Boy George thinks you're mad??
Click to expand...
.
One of my buds in college had a tshirt with an image of Howdy Doodie with garish makeup and braids. The caption was "Boy Howdy"

< /derail >
.
 
From our newest best buddy, former stripper and No Planer, I give you this:

How do you know the following:

1) The sample came from the WTC @ 9/11/2001?

location of the find, similarity with published literature on the dust

2) The sample was not contaminated at or after 9/11/2001?

it was contaminated with cigarette butts but not rain, due to the concrete overhang
Click to expand...

Oh lordy, 16.5 has got this one in the bag!

Here is the link, post 19 in this thread.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=6542184#post6542184
 
Last edited:
240-185 said:
I nominate this picture:

[qimg]http://failblog.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/128888103486002222.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Oh we had woo like that in my small home town some years back: On the outskirts of some nearby village are the premises of a waste management company. About the time they erected a wind park just across the minor highway, that firm started to specialise in hazardous garbage treatment. The editor of a really pesky local ad-payed "investigative" journal then pushed for years the claim that the wind mills were propellers to disperse toxic dust, and I think there are still folks around here who believe that is likely :D
 
jaydeehess said:
Oy Vey!
Dusty is worse, I thought it not possible, than jammonius.

You have my vote 16.5

I see also that she states that the steel contained iron and "magnetism".

Where can I get, say, a liter of magnetism?
Click to expand...
At Woo-Mart:
With ever 4 liters of gravity you purchase, you get a liter of magnetism free!
 
Fracking gravity, how does it work?

Quiproquo

Explaining to antitruthers the concept of CD is like trying to demonstrate the concept of gravity to a sceptic. The inevitable questions will be:

How does gravity pull us down to earth?

Where are the strings? (an antitruther constant)

Do you mean to say that it pulls me just as much with or without a ten-foot-thick slab of concrete between me and the earth?

How does the stuff 4,000 miles down know how hard to pull me?


http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6545940&postcount=90
 
By the way where and when did we discover that dusty used to be a stripper?
 
Travis said:
By the way where and when did we discover that dusty used to be a stripper?
Click to expand...

Why in the world would it matter if someone here is a former, current, or future stripper? Someone who is stripping as he or she posts here might still make valid logical arguments... or not. Bringing it up at all, espcially as 16.5 did alongside "no planer" makes it clear that this is something we are supposed to hold against her. The no-plane part? Yeah, absolutely. It shows a lack of common sense and logical thinking AND is directly relevant to the topic at hand. But why care if someone is or was a stripper?

Sorry, I'll get down off the soapbox now.
 
NobbyNobbs said:
First time I'm nominating a Stundie, so i hope it qualifies as such. It comes in two parts:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=6542026#post6542026
Click to expand...

Having run directly away from all things military and weapon-like for the first thirty years of my life, I never saw an ordnance blast in real life. I've only seen pictures and videos.

I certainly never expected to be spending all this time trying to discover a weapon. I wanted to work on my schenanigans.
Click to expand...

followed by

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=6542138#post6542138[/quote]
In which WTC Dust compares a picture of an ordinance blast to the pictures of the smoke plume above the crash of Flt 93

I don't know how to quote from other threads, otherwise I would.
Click to expand...

Copy and paste from the other thread and surround with [qote] [/quote] (just include the missing 'u' in the first set)
 
SOdhner said:
Why in the world would it matter if someone here is a former, current, or future stripper? Someone who is stripping as he or she posts here might still make valid logical arguments... or not. Bringing it up at all, espcially as 16.5 did alongside "no planer" makes it clear that this is something we are supposed to hold against her. The no-plane part? Yeah, absolutely. It shows a lack of common sense and logical thinking AND is directly relevant to the topic at hand. But why care if someone is or was a stripper?

Sorry, I'll get down off the soapbox now.
Click to expand...

While you do have a point in that a genius can still be a genius no matter what predillections he or she may have, it is less likely that someone with no background or training in any field of science will be able to argue well on any technical issue. The same works in reverse of course too. S.Jones and J.Wood illustrate (and Schotkey from the past springs to mind as well) that having training and education only makes it less likely, not impossible, that a person will be able to make a logical and technically vaild arguement.

- probably a topic for its own thread though.
 
SOdhner said:
Why in the world would it matter if someone here is a former, current, or future stripper? Someone who is stripping as he or she posts here might still make valid logical arguments... or not. Bringing it up at all, espcially as 16.5 did alongside "no planer" makes it clear that this is something we are supposed to hold against her. The no-plane part? Yeah, absolutely. It shows a lack of common sense and logical thinking AND is directly relevant to the topic at hand. But why care if someone is or was a stripper?

Sorry, I'll get down off the soapbox now.
Click to expand...

Please do and next time take your soapbox to the proper place.
 
tsig said:
Please do and next time take your soapbox to the proper place.
Click to expand...

So this is the proper place to discuss whether someone is or is not a stripper, but not to discuss whether or not it matters if someone was a stripper?

Huh.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom