I'm a connect-the-dots kinda guy, especially in this case...
In that case, you might easily be a conspiracy theorist. Are you?
Tell me how else to interpret this paragraph: 'I am determined to see that justice is served in the death of Colonel James Sabow, as a step toward establishing the truth of events such as the September 11 demolitions and institutions such as the coup regime of 1963 that maintains itself in power through the global drug trade, financial corruption, and murder, among other crimes.
I cannot tell YOU how to interpret the paragraph, as you are not asking for interpretation. Rather, you are engaging in rhetoric and are telling us how to interpret it. And, your interpretation is plausible, but it is not very strong or convincing that Bedell was "a truther."
You have correctly quoted what he said, but it is just as plausible to say that his reference to "a step toward establishing the truth of events such as the September 11 demolitions" is but an example of what his larger point is. Further, the truth of September 11 is, to him, but "a step" towards a larger goal.
A lot of people, a majority of Americans according to some surveys, do not believe the official myth of 9/11 and a similar majority of Americans are thought to favor a "new" investigation (not understanding, perhaps, there's not ever been a valid investigation in the first place). I don't think it fair to call the majority of Americans "truthers" by virtue of their having called for finding out the truth of the event and/or for harboring doubts about the common myth.
Is this just me, here posters, or do you folks also think anyone who, say, supports a "new" 9/11 investigation is a truther?
With thousands of unstable, angry and paranoid white men reading countless mythical, angry and paranoid accounts of the US government's (bush regime, as commonly referred to by truthers at JREF) false flag operation to murder 3000 innocent people, it's just a matter of time before more of them take random pot-shots at government personnel.
It is America's 21st Century witch hunt unfolding as we speak...
Is it possible that those who are, as you say, "unstable, angry and paranoid..." got that way primarily because of the current financial collapse and the transfer of wealth to the financial elite, in exchange for the debt to be paid by the public?