tsig
a carbon based life-form
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2005
- Messages
- 39,049
Most people don't have to go around reassuring others about that.
-
Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more
Split Thread 'Nose-out' footage
- Thread starter TruthersLie
- Start date
Most people don't have to go around reassuring others about that.
Slayhamlet
Master Poster
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2007
- Messages
- 2,423
Did you miss this? Answer the question, please.
Heck, Galileo had a jury decide it for him. It's all relative.
Last edited:
TJM
Potsing Whiled Runk
Not the answers you want to hear at JREF.
Slayhamlet
Master Poster
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2007
- Messages
- 2,423
Does anyone have any idea what the hell he's talking about?
W.D.Clinger
Philosopher
In a couple of pictures, certain irrelevant details are obvious; in a couple of the others, those particular details are hard to see or obscured altogether. Algebra34, using ostrich logic, concludes that those details are present at one moment but not at another, hence coverup, hence inside jobbity-job.
Holey Friggin Mackerel. Are you for real? I MEAN STILL?
The answer to your question is NO.
Please tell me Mr. Debunker that you still can't see the difference in the two pictures I compared. Here you go one more time. I posted both pictures twice.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=5491052#post5491052
Please prove my point yet once more time.
AND STILL NO DEBUNKER HERE EVEN ATTEMPTS TO ANSWER WHAT I EVEN ASKED TO BEGIN WITH.
PATHETIC.
That is true the nose-out delusions is pathetic. I support your claim of the nose-out lie to be pathetic nonsense.
ummm..this is a place for discussion and debate. its not a true source for actual answers. if you want answers, contact the relevant agencies or companies.
though i won't hold my breath, for thou art a truther, and truthers don't care about truth.
Slayhamlet
Master Poster
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2007
- Messages
- 2,423
Of course no one has confused these two photos. That would be like confusing a circle with a square. Not to mention that posting the exact same picture twice would not make a whit of sense. What an absolutely bizarre assertion.
What people have pointed out to you is that both pictures show the same two pieces of the fuselage, just from different perspectives.
In this one...
it looks like the white paint of the "6" intersects the window.
But, as was already explained to you, the "6" does not in fact intersect with the window. It would ridiculous, after all, for the aircraft identification number to be covered over by windows. If you look more closely, you can see that there are actually two separate pieces of the fuselage in the picture. The part with the white numbers painted on it is behind the larger piece with the windows. The darker shading (due to shadow) of blue paint on the smaller piece makes it possible to trace the outline of most of the larger piece's left side, which happens to line up perfectly with the second picture.
It doesn't look like that in this image.
As can be seen by comparing the angle of the visible rail in both pictures, the first picture was taken at a lesser distance from the wreckage and at a higher angle. The second photo is lower to the ground (probably because the photographer was ducking) and much further to the right. This accounts for the differing relative positions of the two parts between photos.
332nd
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2006
- Messages
- 11,278
Maybe if your question made sense?
Come on Slay. If you knew that then why did you post this? lol! And still. You don't address what I asked.
Slayhamlet
Master Poster
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2007
- Messages
- 2,423
Then why are you lying about "debunkers" by saying they cannot distinguish two obviously different photos when the only two images that were claimed to be the same are the ones in the post of mine you quoted above?
One picture the paint looks like where it should be.
Another picture the paint looks like it intersects with the window.
Two different pictures.
Some debunkers didn't even realize these were two different pictures as they were calling me stupid. Even though they now pretend they did know. lol
But I still want to know. Why does the paint in the one picture look like it is in a different spot than it is in the other picture? That's all I ever asked.
IS THIS SPOON FED ENOUGH FOR DEBUNKERS? YET???
Do some debunkers just pretend to be stupid as a last resort?
Yeah right Slay. That's why you posted the wrong picture. lol
What does your weak insult have to do with the idiotic nose-out delusion? Is there more than you failing to realize the photos are different perspectives and different color temperature? Your point is off topic if you ever had one.
The only thing stupid is the nose-out scam. Is this your best support for no planes? The nose-out is part of the no plane delusion; are you a no plane supporter? Guess not since you are talking about the part from an aircraft used by terrorists on 911.
332nd
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2006
- Messages
- 11,278
Right.
Whom?
And it was answered...
A W Smith said:
Do you understand this answer or do you need someone to explain it to you?
Now, now, don't get fussy. That's a big reason your questions were unclear.