PhantomWolf
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
- Messages
- 21,203
You are aware, I hope, that tweets do not constitute US policy.
Again, something you might want to take up with your present Leader.
You are aware, I hope, that tweets do not constitute US policy.
Again, something you might want to take up with your present Leader.
Not relevant to your claim.
Anyone who buys Norker propaganda deserves whatever is coming to them. PT Barnum had an adage for you fools.
You mean my claim that the US has a habit if poking its nose into how other countries are run and trying to or actually effecting regime change via covert or overt methods? Are you really going to deny that?
That wasn't your claim. You moved the goalpost. I'm not interested in chasing your goalpost around.
Lol
You are aware, I hope, that tweets do not constitute US policy.
Ah. So an ethnic slur akin to 'jap' or 'nip' or 'chink', then?
Or "cow-orker"?Or Brit or Yank?
Fair point, I suppose there's a degree of context involved that isn't particularly clear here.Or Brit or Yank?
The context here seems a bit clearerOr "cow-orker"?
Ah. So an ethnic slur akin to 'jap' or 'nip' or 'chink', then?
Fair point, I suppose there's a degree of context involved that isn't particularly clear here.
No, it's not an ethnic slur. South Koreans are ethnically identical to North Koreans, but the term doesn't apply to them. It's specific to North Koreans only.
Exactly it is a national slur, like calling the french cheese eating surrender monkeys, or the germans krauts.
Some abbreviations (such as 'paki') target ethnicities rather than nationalities.
Some abbreviations (such as 'brit') target nationalities rather than ethnicities.
As i've never heard of South Koreans (or other Asians) being called "norks" or "norkers", I'm guessing this is the second type (by definition, not an "ethnic" slur).
Is there a derisive connotation to the term?
Stop being offended for other people - or something.