• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Norman Minetta

Just when he had us where he wanted us and was about to go for the kill!
 
Yeah, it's a good thing that Lisa caught on and banned him because he really had us on the ropes.

I have to say that I didn't suspect he was another P'Doh sock. With that, I'm now pretty much ready to declare victory over this particular brand of nonsense. The "Truth" movement is smoldering, contained to a handful of wackjobs. Someone might have to come in to stomp out little fires occasionally, but there will never again be the phenomenon of having large numbers of people get sucked into the movement.

We helped, Southpark helped (a lot), and the Scholars helped by exposing themselves as lunatics. Good job all, let's go have a beer!
 
CurtC said:
Yeah, it's a good thing that Lisa caught on and banned him because he really had us on the ropes.

I have to say that I didn't suspect he was another P'Doh sock. With that, I'm now pretty much ready to declare victory over this particular brand of nonsense. The "Truth" movement is smoldering, contained to a handful of wackjobs. Someone might have to come in to stomp out little fires occasionally, but there will never again be the phenomenon of having large numbers of people get sucked into the movement.

We helped, Southpark helped (a lot), and the Scholars helped by exposing themselves as lunatics. Good job all, let's go have a beer!
Click to expand...
There goes my job security... :(
 
stundie said:
Sorry,


In previous history, if the FAA saw a plane go off track, lost contact either visual or audio, then NORAD would scramble a plane to establish a visual too evaluate if there was a problem or whether it was a threat.
Click to expand...
How many times must stupid CTers bring up this patently misleading piece of bull? Besides the well known Stewart case (which you CTers time wrong) can you provide ONE instance of an intercept involving a civilian plane in the 10 years prior to 9/11? Not only that but can you please explain the difference between a scramble and an intercept?
 
Last edited:
CurtC said:
I have to say that I didn't suspect he was another P'Doh sock.
Click to expand...

Well, we started to suspect earlier today, based on his early-morning posts.

He seems to be getting better at concealing himself at first, but when we end up fact-slapping him, he still self-destructs and goes off into PD'oh Dismissive BS land, with a stopover in Misquoteville. I guess it's all a question of how long he can go before having a meltdown. He joined on 21st November 2006, and it's the 29th now, so it looks like 8 days.

He'll probably show up again, so I vote, the next CTist who shows up, should just be called Sock-Boy right from the start. We might be wrong, but that's not how I'd bet.

CurtC said:
We helped, Southpark helped (a lot), and the Scholars helped by exposing themselves as lunatics. Good job all, let's go have a beer!
Click to expand...

Going to have a beer is always a good idea!
 
Horatius said:
Well, we started to suspect earlier today, based on his early-morning posts.

He seems to be getting better at concealing himself at first, but when we end up fact-slapping him, he still self-destructs and goes off into PD'oh Dismissive BS land, with a stopover in Misquoteville. I guess it's all a question of how long he can go before having a meltdown. He joined on 21st November 2006, and it's the 29th now, so it looks like 8 days.

He'll probably show up again, so I vote, the next CTist who shows up, should just be called Sock-Boy right from the start. We might be wrong, but that's not how I'd bet.
Going to have a beer is always a good idea!
Click to expand...


I called it first: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=2129530#post2129530
 
AND another thing Stundie...........Oh I see he is banned, oh well back to eating popcorn for me.

Incidentally to any lurkers out there please be under no misunderstanding as to the pure hatred this individual has to JREF.

These are his thoughts on another blog.
They are all PEDOPHILES. You are a pedophile and any children you have come into contact with should be interviewed.
Click to expand...
It is my opinion that TAM is a scumbag that should be struck off any medical register he might be on.
Click to expand...
You see thats why they are our pets. The little errands we send them on, like when your dog gets your newspaper from the doormat.
Click to expand...
Abby Scott trying in vain to debunk Jason Bermas despite her obviously fancying him. There was a sexual tension there, well she felt horny and he felt tense...I would feel tense if I thought she wanted a piece of me
Click to expand...
i went to the JREF Forum just now and it is exactly what i suspected.
Loads of faceless trolls pretending to be structural engineers ganging up on one truther and calling them a thick kid with no qualifications.
Click to expand...

And it goes on and on, ranging from everybody here to be murderers to god knows what else.

This individual will not listen to reason, will not debate; he simply wishes to troll and demonize anybody who he sees as his opposition. To the lurkers, this is the individual that spout this garbage. This is the mindset of one individual who has now been banned from here for the sixth time.
Here is his blog, please read it.

http://911debunkingthedebunkers.blogspot.com/
 
Arkan_Wolfshade said:
I called it first: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=2129530#post2129530
Click to expand...

I think we need to develop some standards for how we call "sock". I originally thought that post was a subtle call for the "I have the socks" treatment they tried on Christophera, in an attempt to get Sock-Boy to stick to a topic. Although, I admit that your interpretation is valid.

Do we have a "Boy" icon we coould used in combination with the socks?

Or we could use the picture of Socks the First Cat someone posted in another thread.

ETA: Found it!

Bell said:
Socks_cat_1.JPG
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
stateofgrace said:
AND another thing Stundie...........Oh I see he is banned, oh well back to eating popcorn for me.

Incidentally to any lurkers out there please be under no misunderstanding as to the pure hatred this individual has to JREF.

These are his thoughts on another blog.

And it goes on and on, ranging from everybody here to be murderers to god knows what else.

This individual will not listen to reason, will not debate; he simply wishes to troll and demonize anybody who he sees as his opposition. To the lurkers, this is the individual that spout this garbage. This is the mindset of one individual who has now been banned from here for the sixth time.
Here is his blog, please read it.

http://911debunkingthedebunkers.blogspot.com/
Click to expand...


Stateofgrace, can you post the links to the pdoherty comments you quote? I'd like to see the full, horrible, context for his bile.
 
Horatius said:
I think we need to develop some standards for how we call "sock". I originally thought that post was a subtle call for the "I have the socks" treatment they tried on Christophera, in an attempt to get Sock-Boy to stick to a topic. Although, I admit that your interpretation is valid.

Do we have a "Boy" icon we coould used in combination with the socks?

Or we could use the picture of Socks the First Cat someone posted in another thread.

ETA: Found it!
Click to expand...

hehe :)
That would be great!

btw, so stundie was a sock of P D'oh? How many does that make?
 
Dog Town said:
Now this is F'ing hysterical

I can't stop laughing!
Click to expand...
I tend to think that's a hoax. It's a brand-new listing, he uses the same name as in these forums, under "What are you looking for" it says "no idea!" and the photo looks like it was taken in prison with a homemade camera.

Then again, as dumb as pdoherty is, the ad could be genuine. :eye-poppi
 
pdoherty's pdoherty76

29th November 2006, stundie has been banned as a sock puppet of pdoherty, etc.

18th November 2006, 08:33 AM Shades_of_Grey has been banned as a sockpuppet of pdoherty etc.

31st October 2006, 08:19 PM jessicarabbit has been banned as a sockpuppet of pdoherty etc.

26th October 2006, 05:59 PM Laith has been banned (was a sock puppet of Docker/pdoherty)


25th October 2006, 11:38 PM Docker has been banned (was a sock puppet of pdoherty76)

21st October 2006, 02:54 PM pdoherty76 has been banned

are there more?
 
Gravy said:
I tend to think that's a hoax. It's a brand-new listing, he uses the same name as in these forums, under "What are you looking for" it says "no idea!" and the photo looks like it was taken in prison with a homemade camera.

Then again, as dumb as pdoherty is, the ad could be genuine. :eye-poppi
Click to expand...

If it's fake, it still cracks me up. As a betting man... I say It's him, he is that stupid!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom