Seriously! I haven't heard from Edwards in a long time. Could it be because his charisma overshadows Kerry's and the campaign managers want to downplay this?
I think he should do like I said and THEN quit talking about it. He should treat every attack exactly like I said - a quick short and decisive bite-sized statement that is both pithy and strong, followed by ignoring that attack forever after. Instead, he is just skipping right to the ignoring part.
He needs to attack Bush, because he will be defined by the RNC if he doesn't. He does need to state, in unequivocal soundbite form, what his positions are. He should also say that he voted to give the president authority to invade Iraq because he thought Bush would be doing it like his father, with coalitions and support and only as a last resort, and certainly not illegally or virtually unilaterally, and only AFTER the US was finished in Afghanistan and had captured Osama.
He should also say that he voted against the $87 billion bill because it had things X, Y, and Z in it. Then he should follow that by saying that Bush should have waited until AFTER our troops had the necessary equipment like flak jackets before sending them into Iraq, not send them without the necessary tools and then try to get Congress to vote on it. He should follow THAT with the soundbite ready "He sent the men into danger and said "don't worry, we'll vote on your equipment later."
Or, he should just fart the National Anthem during the debates. Not the US one, I mean the Radiohead song.