Edmonds is pushing seventy and his never displayed any signs of being particularly technically literate, so probably no.
So far we have him making false (and potentially criminal) claims about a device, the fact that his former assistant (the one who a judge accused of lying for him) is a director of the company making the device and him probably ownership of the company's websites.
I wonder what the ASA (who are investigating) will unearth?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.