tsig
a carbon based life-form
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2005
- Messages
- 39,049
I still wonder how many unborn children did God murder in the flood?
Didn't count, god knew they were going to be sinners.*
*Actual fundie answer.
I still wonder how many unborn children did God murder in the flood?
They claim carbon dating proves the relics are 4,800 years old
The dispersal of the animals from the ark to the four corners of the earth (it had four corners back then, of course) has such an obvious explanation that it should hardly need expounding: Pangaea.
I would think that an Australian, of all people, would understand that. How else do you explain the presence of English speaking people on your continent? Did they walk across the sea? The marsupials and the hedgehog were settled down as neighbors, just as the Australian and English did. Then they drifted.
The period of time between the landing of the ark and reliable historical records must have been a really amazing time to be alive. Not only were animals evolving before your very eyes, the continents were drifting so fast you could see it happen. A unicorn rancher in Atlantis goes to bed one night only to wake up the next day and find himself herding yaks in a Tibetan monastery. Such times!
Would this be the sort of evangelicals who usually claim that dinosaurs didn't live millions of years ago, and radioisotope dating doesn't prove that they did because it isn't reliable?
Love Boat.
Alright, fine. I guess there's no possibility that this could be Noah's Ark. None whatsoever. Case closed.
I choose to make up my mind after compelling evidence is shown, not before. Maybe I don't fully understand the concept, then, of skepticism.
How can you possibly doubt the impartiality of an organization named "Noah's Ark Ministries International ".![]()
Youre treading very close to the litigation line there sonnyIf the structure was shown to be a boat, shown to be the proper age, and shown to have"PROPERTY OF NOAH"PROPERTY OF ZIUSUDRA carved in it inthe correct languageAKKADIAN CUNEIFORM and all of that was quadruple-checked by independant scientists I would happily agree that this thing had something to do with thebiblicalMESOPOTAMIAN account. In a sense, then, I would be able to say "Yeah, they foundNoah'sZIUSUDRAS Ark". If that's all you want, then there you go.

Now we can find out what gopher wood is.
Now we can find out what gopher wood is.
In the old days, going out to fetch wood could have been hard work!It's the excuse to dissappear for a bit when the hard work needs to be done!![]()
Points of Interest from the Story:
• God's purpose in the flood was not to destroy people, but to destroy wickedness and sin.
With more detail, God instructed Noah to take seven of every kind of clean animal, and two of every kind of unclean animal. Bible scholars have calculated that approximately 45,000 animals might have fit on the ark.
Genesis 7:16 interestingly points out that God shut them in the ark, or "closed the door," so to speak.
The ark was exactly six times longer than it was wide. According to the Life Application Bible study notes, this is the same ratio used by modern ship builders.
Question for Reflection:
Noah was righteous and blameless, but he was not sinless (see Genesis 9:20).
Noah pleased God and found favor because he loved and obeyed God with his whole heart. As a result, Noah's life was an example to his entire generation. Although everyone around him followed the evil in their hearts, Noah followed God. Does your life set an example, or are you negatively influenced by the people around you?
If the structure was shown to be a boat, shown to be the proper age, and shown to have "PROPERTY OF NOAH" carved in it in the correct language and all of that was quadruple-checked by independent scientists I would happily agree that this thing had something to do with the biblical account. In a sense, then, I would be able to say "Yeah, they found Noah's Ark". If that's all you want, then there you go.
And all this would prove is that part of the Bible story was true. That there was a guy who had a large boat and his name was Noah. But that doesn't make the rest of it true, which is something very difficult to explain to fundies sometimes, who think if ANY part of a Bible story can be verified, the whole thing is true.
Let's just say, for example, that a story says that sacrifices were done to the jaguar god in such and such a place, and that they ended a famine. And we FIND that place, it really exists, and sacrifices to the jaguar god really did happen there. Does that mean that the jaguar god is real, and we should all still be doing human sacrifices?
.... It seems that the bible is to be taken literally when it is convenient to take it literally and to be reinterpreted when it has inconvenient little mismatches.
When was the last time you saw a chichuaua crossed with a great Dane ?
Interesting claims being made here:
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2010/04/latest_ark_finding_is_a_fake.php