Complexity
Philosopher
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2005
- Messages
- 9,242
To the thread title:
No.
No.
This fits in well here : http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/2949640/Noahs-Ark-found-in-Turkey.html
What do you all think? Seems a little lacking in the details - a more full picture might come about if the object was excavated properly. Also, the story says these are "evangelical archaeologists", so a little confirmation bias maybe?
Ugh. Shades of Ron Wyatt.
The Biblical dimensions of the ark put it as being smaller than an Arleigh-Burke class Destroyer, which I served on for six years. Two of every animal crammed into that? I don't think so.
We're honestly supposed to believe that one man and his family singlehandedly figured out how to do open-ocean sailing through trial and error?
What did they do for waste, sanitation, disease abatement, food spoilage, predator isolation, animal food, bacteria storage, ship righting...it goes on and on and on.
And there wasn't any world-covering flood. I feel sorry for the legitimate archaeologists that are going to have to go BACK to Ararat after all this time over a fat lot of nothing.
Full: MSNBCNoah's Ark found? Not so fast
MSNBC
Tuesday, April 27, 2010 4:00 PM
by Alan Boyle
Web sites are buzzing over claims that remains from Noah’s Ark may have been found on Turkey’s Mount Ararat. The finders, led by an evangelical group, say they are "99.9 percent" that a wooden structure found on the mountainside was part of a ship that housed the Biblical Noah, his family and a menagerie of creatures during a giant flood 4,800 years ago.
But researchers who have spent decades studying the region – and fending off past claims of ark discoveries – caution that a boatload of skepticism is in order.
"You have to take everything out of context except the Bible to get something tolerable, and they're not even working much with the Bible," said Paul Zimansky, an archaeologist and historian at Stony Brook University who specializes in the Near East - and especially the region around Ararat, known as Urartu.
Cornell archaeologist Peter Ian Kuniholm, who has focused on Turkey for decades, was even more direct - saying that the reported find is a "crock."
...
Here is an article dealing with the size and estimated number of animals required on board.
Was Noah's Ark BIG ENOUGH?
http://www.biblestudy.org/basicart/sizeark.html
Well, one expert thinks it is a "crock."
Er, it was there to start with?There goes your credibility.
Pity the ones with the dinosaurs sank.Must have been a flotilla of arks.
Steve S
There goes your credibility.
Er, it was there to start with?
That article hurts my head. The leaps in logic are astounding.