• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged No Planes At WTC (Split from: WTC Dust)

Status
Not open for further replies.
DGM said:
In her world, tissue paper will stop a bullet.
Click to expand...

I just wish she would share with us her interpretation of what would happen if you dropped a chicken from the top of the World Trade Center Tower 1 onto a parked 767 on the street below?

I guess we'll never know, since the WTC towers aren't there anymore...dammit!
 
OCaptain said:
That's not an equation, Tracy.
Click to expand...

Hey, what's your first name? Equations don't need to use equal signs and traditional notation to be valid.

"One plus one equals two" is an equation.
"The forces are equal in both directions" is an equation.

They key aspect to an equation is the equality being determined, not the notation.
 
OCaptain said:
I just wish she would share with us her interpretation of what would happen if you dropped a chicken from the top of the World Trade Center Tower 1 onto a parked 767 on the street below?

I guess we'll never know, since the WTC towers aren't there anymore...dammit!
Click to expand...

Tissue paper wouldn't stop a bullet. It would slow it down a little bit.
 
WTC Dust said:
Hey, what's your first name? Equations don't need to use equal signs and traditional notation to be valid.

"One plus one equals two" is an equation.
"The forces are equal in both directions" is an equation.

They key aspect to an equation is the equality being determined, not the notation.
Click to expand...

Your semantics games notwithstanding, your response was not an equation, and show no understanding of these "forces" other than your stating of the obvious.
 
WTC Dust said:
Did you calculate the force in the northerly direction? Sincere question again.
Click to expand...

Nope.

Do you know why? Because I'm not the one claiming to have figured out 9/11 based on what "the science" says can and can't happen.
 
OCaptain said:
Your semantics games notwithstanding, your response was not an equation, and show no understanding of these "forces" other than your stating of the obvious.
Click to expand...

If a plane exerted a force in the northerly direction onto a steel wall,
that steel wall would have exerted a force in the southerly direction
onto the plane at the exact same time and with the exact same
magnitude of force that the plane exerted onto the building.

This is also an equation. There are two things here that are equal.
"Plane force ------><------ Building force"

(this is also an equation)
 
WTC Dust said:
If a plane exerted a force in the northerly direction onto a steel wall,
that steel wall would have exerted a force in the southerly direction
onto the plane at the exact same time and with the exact same
magnitude of force that the plane exerted onto the building.

This is also an equation. There are two things here that are equal.
"Plane force ------><------ Building force"

(this is also an equation)
Click to expand...

More semantics.
 
OCaptain said:
Nope.

Do you know why? Because I'm not the one claiming to have figured out 9/11 based on what "the science" says can and can't happen.
Click to expand...

What you might not know or might be forgetting about is that my research
isn't about planes or trajectories.


You and others like you focus on a plane concept. Not me. All this plane
talk is because you and others like you keep asking these questions.

My research is about the material remains of the WTC.
 
OCaptain said:
More semantics.
Click to expand...

Do you think semantics is a bad thing? Equations are what they are.
They don't have to follow a particular notation, as long as they
are equating two equal things (like the forces exerted in a collision).
 
WTC Dust said:
What you might not know or might be forgetting about is that my research
isn't about planes or trajectories.


You and others like you focus on a plane concept. Not me. All this plane
talk is because you and others like you keep asking these questions.

My research is about the material remains of the WTC.
Click to expand...

Diversion.
 
WTC Dust said:
Do you think semantics is a bad thing? Equations are what they are.
They don't have to follow a particular notation, as long as they
are equating two equal things (like the forces exerted in a collision).
Click to expand...

Your use of "equations" in these threads show no more than a cursory understanding of the mechanics behind the events you purport to explain.

Do you understand how this lessens your credibility?
 
WTC Dust said:
What you might not know or might be forgetting about is that my research
isn't about planes or trajectories.


You and others like you focus on a plane concept. Not me. All this plane
talk is because you and others like you keep asking these questions.

My research is about the material remains of the WTC.
Click to expand...

Um... No we focus on the planes because they crashed into the towers.

You claim they did not.

Prove it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom