I very much doubt that the current military intervention (=civilian casualties)
And Qhaddafi's brutal suppression of the resistance didn't cause civilian casualties, I imagine?
I very much doubt that the current military intervention (=civilian casualties)
Libya is a sovereign country, with 3.5% of global oil reserves, cheap to extract and refine, more than twice as much as the US.
I very much doubt that the current military intervention (=civilian casualties) will make things better. It is much more likely to make things worse, possibly leading to yet another quagmire of perpetual violence, opening up a fourth war theatre.
That isn't an excuse to stand by and watch Gaddafi bomb and shell people.
The motivation of the 'usual players' isn't something we can know for sure. If they overstep the limits of the requested help, then we can criticise them. But I don't think they have.
Hmmm...Libya is a sovereign country, with 3.5% of global oil reserves, cheap to extract and refine, more than twice as much as the US.
How does this square with your conspiracy theory? If anything, this action jeopardizes the operations of western oil companies in Libya.BP said its $900 million exploration and production deal with Libya's National Oil Co. remains valid and the terms are unchanged, despite the country's month-old crisis and the threat of sanctions from Western governments.
...Italy's Eni said Wednesday its own ties with Libya hadn't been compromised as a result of the unrest.
That's a mighty big "if", don't you think? There's a reason you don't see many significant armed uprisings against liberal democratic states. Uprisings against 2-bit tin pot dictators, however, are a dime a dozen.If there was an armed uprising in the US, encouraged by foreigners,
There are other options than military violence.
There are other options than military violence.
They were there long before help was requested. They helped create the situation they are now "helping".
Minister Louis Abdul-Haleem Farrakhan Muhammad warns Obama to be "careful how you manipulate the dissatisfaction in Libya and other parts of the Muslim world".
A great speech:
There are downsides - no political parties, no al Qaeda, no CIA stuff, no foreign oil companies, no meddling pro-democracy NGOs, no splitting the country in half. The punishments for some of these things are fierce.
The Arab League have now criticized the Allied airstrikes.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/blog/2011/mar/20/libya-air-strikes-live-updates#block-14
Day 1. 48 Libyans killed by American missiles.
USA, USA, USA....
This would be from Libyan TV that has also reported that the uprising is caused by al qaeda giving out drugs.
I would suggest finding a more cedible source. Soveit era pravda perhaps.
Libya/Gaddy has ordered a self-imposed ceasefire beginning at 2100 local time.
There are other options than military violence.
If there was an armed uprising in the US, encouraged by foreigners, what would the US government do? Would it talk to them or bomb them?
(Probably the latter.)
They were there long before help was requested. They helped create the situation they are now "helping".
They were there long before help was requested. They helped create the situation they are now "helping".
Russia says Western strikes kill Libyan civilians
"[Foreign Ministry spokesman AlexanderLukashevich] said 48 civilians were reported to have been killed and 150 wounded in the air strikes, figures that matched those given early on Sunday by Libyan state TV. He said strikes had destroyed a medical facility, roads and bridges."
The Arab League chief said on Sunday that Arabs did not want military strikes by Western powers that hit civilians when the League called for a no-fly zone over Libya.
In comments carried by Egypt's official state news agency, Secretary-General Amr Moussa also said he was calling for an emergency Arab League meeting to discuss the situation in the Arab world and particularly Libya.
'What is happening in Libya differs from the aim of imposing a no-fly zone, and what we want is the protection of civilians and not the bombardment of more civilians,' he said[/I]"
Arab League head says wanted no-fly zone not bombs
Libya/Gaddy has ordered a self-imposed ceasefire beginning at 2100 local time.
There are many recent reports of pro-Gaddy snipers and tanks wreaking havoc in downtown Misurata with some reports saying much of the central city has been leveled by tank shelling over the past few hours.
How else does the Arab League expect the no-fly zone to be implemented?
Do they think the no-fly zone is just going to happen by itself? That's why they asked the West for help, they don't have the guns to do the job.
I am expecting some announcments from the LIbyan government that will bring back memoris of the Iraqi Information Minister back in 2003.
Libyan state television is also quoting the military as saying its troops have "downed the barbaric, unjust, Crusading enemy's war jets".