Redwood
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- May 9, 2012
- Messages
- 1,557
The 2009 paper "Active Thermitic Material found...". The falsehoods start with the very first words after the title. These words are:
"Niels H. Harrit, ..."Why is even his name on the first page a falsehood? Because by putting him in first place among nine authors, it is to be understood that Harrit is the lead author of the paper. That impression is FALSE, and it is deliberately FALSE. The thermite-theory is fundamentally and originally Jones's, who also did some of the experiments, and most of the experimental work was done by Farrer. I have it on good authority from at least two sources that Harrit played no major role at all in compiling this paper: The hypothesis is not his, the experiments are not his, the discussion is not his, the conclusions are not his. At most, he may have made a suggestion here or there.
So the fraud of the Harrit saga begins with the moment his name is even mentioned!
In Hollywood, when you take credit for someone else's work, you take credit for someone else's success, not a colossal failure!