New UFO Video

[De_Bunk]

I always wonder why any UFO is never filmed right above the person at a low altitude and within the cameras focus...

1) Why are UFO's always seen in the distance......

2) Why isnt any UFO able to fly at low altitudes...

3) Why hasnt any UFO ever been seen within the clear focal range of a Video camera...

4) Why do all the UFO's that fly at night, comply with F.A.A law and appear completely lit up...Why not totally blacked out, flying low....

5) Why do people think that UFO's, from an advanced species, could be picked up by Earths radar and satellites...Humans have "Stealth" technology....Why havent the visitors from another part of the universe...

6) Why do UFO's always pick remote..barely inhabited...miles from anywhere places...to land or crash...

7) Why has every UFO that has visited Earth always seemed to be "Non Hostile"...Surely one of the species would be a race of war mongering, all conquering bastards...

8) Why has no other galactic species ever built or left alien artifacts on the Moon or Mars or Earth...and if not...why not ??

9) Why does every species or race of aliens, only ever seem to appear and communicate to "Mr / Mrs Average"....

All that vast intellect thats needed to travel billions of miles across the galaxy and instead of talking to world leaders and scientists...they choose a McDonalds worker or farmer to discuss the meaning of life and the Universe...

10) Why does mankind believe it could actually defend itself against a vastly superior race of beings...

Just a thought..

Anyone got anymore...

De_Bunk

 

[Purple Tentacle]

yeah i have something to say, why do aliens have such big heads a head that size would be great for zero gravity but on earth they are gunna look like this :

 

[Marc]

In talking about one UFO, just a bunch of lights in the sky really, I put forward the possibility that they were lit balloons or flares because I heard that they did not appear on radar. Not sure if balloons are invisible to radar.

A friend said he would think aliens with the technology to reach here would have the ability to defeat our radar.


Sure, they have the tech to hide from radar to remain unnoticed, but then forget and leave their headlights on!

 

[De_Bunk]

Balloons are visible to radar..

As pointed out in the song "99 Red Balloons" by Nena...

 

[Lothian]

Balloons are visible to radar..

As pointed out in the song "99 Red Balloons" by Nena...

Note to self.

When things get so bad that I study the meaning of Nena song lyrics it's time to stop drinking.

 

[malaka]

Video

 

[Lothian]

Nena

 

[Dragon]

Originally posted by malaka

Video

My suggestion -
It an insect.
The long object is the body and the two pairs of bright protuberances are the wings catching the light as they beat twice during the frame.

 

[King of the Americas]

To De_Bunk:

And answer to ALL of your points lies in the motive behind each of these entites' visits.

Whether to take a simple visual study of, to interact with, or to seek tissue sample of us, ALL require very different vehicles.

Take Our Scientists for example, on their outings into the wilderness to study 'primative species'. Some of our efforts lie in simply recording their actions, some are designed to actually interact with them even teaching them a form of interspecies-language, and yet some of our efforts are just to 'tag & track' different animals as they go about life in their environment.

When it is that I look with Scientific Eyes, I see much of the same inconsistancy in their behavior and shape, as I do our own form.

 

[Brown]

My suggestion -
It an insect.

It looks like an insect to me, too, but it could be a bird. It's not very large.

 

[CurtC]

No, it's an insect. It looks exactly like the ones at roswellrods.com. Those little white dots on the sides are the places where the wings were at the right angle to reflect sunlight towards the camera. I can't believe that a news reporter was taken in by this.

 

[HotSoup]

No, it's an insect. It looks exactly like the ones at roswellrods.com. Those little white dots on the sides are the places where the wings were at the right angle to reflect sunlight towards the camera. I can't believe that a news reporter was taken in by this.

Because news reporters are such paragons of intellect right? I stoped being suprised a while ago.
Through out my childhood I watched Sixty Minutes with dedication. I would get upset when the stupid football game delayed my favorite show. Then they ran a story about Sudden Acceleration in Audis. With no solid investigation they blamed the car makers. They had a few explanations of how it could be the machine. The NTSD did a complete study and found it was people steping on the wrong pedal. This was the easiest most straight forward solution, operator error. Which is what I had guessed from the begining. But 60 minutes never to my knowledge updated the story. And so my opinion of newsies and reporters took a sharp turn downwards.

 

[Ed]

Just a thought..


De_Bunk

A couple.

Why no evidence ? None

Why not one clear photo?

Why not one revelqation that no person on this planet?

Sniff test, once again

 

[Mr DNA]

I'm just as skeptical as the next guy, but if I were to believe in the little green men from outerspace, here's what I'd say (my devil's advocate repies are below, after each question):

I always wonder why any UFO is never filmed right above the person at a low altitude and within the cameras focus...

1) Why are UFO's always seen in the distance......

'cuz they always fly at high altitudes.

2) Why isnt any UFO able to fly at low altitudes...

No need, they just beam down to Earth when they want to.

3) Why hasnt any UFO ever been seen within the clear focal range of a Video camera...

'cuz they're so far away and the camera operator is usually shooting something else.

4) Why do all the UFO's that fly at night, comply with F.A.A law and appear completely lit up...Why not totally blacked out, flying low....

Obviously the ones that aren't lit up can't be seen.

5) Why do people think that UFO's, from an advanced species, could be picked up by Earths radar and satellites...Humans have "Stealth" technology....Why havent the visitors from another part of the universe...

They don't think that. The lack of radar evidece is always cited as proof that the object is otherworldly.

6) Why do UFO's always pick remote..barely inhabited...miles from anywhere places...to land or crash...

The vast majorityof the Earth's surface is uninhabited. When crashing from such a high altitude they have plenty of time to steer away from population centers.

7) Why has every UFO that has visited Earth always seemed to be "Non Hostile"...Surely one of the species would be a race of war mongering, all conquering bastards...

Non-hostile races evaolve much more rapidly. Their non-agressiveness is what allows them to work together to make such huge advancements.

8) Why has no other galactic species ever built or left alien artifacts on the Moon or Mars or Earth...and if not...why not ??

They have. Ever seen the pyramids?

9) Why does every species or race of aliens, only ever seem to appear and communicate to "Mr / Mrs Average"....

All that vast intellect thats needed to travel billions of miles across the galaxy and instead of talking to world leaders and scientists...they choose a McDonalds worker or farmer to discuss the meaning of life and the Universe...

The vast majority of the population would qualify as average. Ever try to arrange a meeting with a world leader?

10) Why does mankind believe it could actually defend itself against a vastly superior race of beings...

We don't, and besides, they're non-hostile.


Just a thought..

Anyone got anymore...

De_Bunk

 

[Guest]

The video of a Swallow chasing a "rod" sealed it for me. It is an insect.

 

[Guest]

ANOTHER COWARD

Lets not bring the idiot Carlos into this. I for one wish he would just go away.

Chessandtherest:

You are calling me an idiot.
I remember to you that in my notarized application to JREF I explained the reasons why is not an insect or a bird, so that proves that I already knew about that optical illusion.

You are not decent enough to insult me in the "thread" about my case, you are hiding here insulting me without arguments.

You are a COWARD, you can not face me, you are also afraid of my proofs or facts.

POOR COWARD CHESSMANSKEPTIC, Another loser.

Thanks,
S&S

P.S.
You can now go to my thread and insult if you want, but you always be a COWARD.

 

[Purple Tentacle]

Re: ANOTHER COWARD

Chessandtherest:

You are calling me an idiot.
I remember to you that in my notarized application to JREF I explained the reasons why is not an insect or a bird, so that proves that I already knew about that optical illusion.

You are not decent enough to insult me in the "thread" about my case, you are hiding here insulting me without arguments.

You are a COWARD, you can not face me, you are also afraid of my proofs or facts.

POOR COWARD CHESSMANSKEPTIC, Another loser.

Thanks,
S&S

P.S.
You can now go to my thread and insult if you want, but you always be a COWARD.

S&S / Carlos ,
THAT was terrible, you should not be so insulting. your posts are consistantly counter-productive and rude, you are already seen as a Troll, if you want respect you must treat others with respect, and be prepared to take some flak from people who disagree with you. Aim-Up Carlos, Aim-Up or Shut up !

 

[Guest]

Re: ANOTHER COWARD

Chessandtherest:

You are calling me an idiot.
I remember to you that in my notarized application to JREF I explained the reasons why is not an insect or a bird, so that proves that I already knew about that optical illusion.

You are not decent enough to insult me in the "thread" about my case, you are hiding here insulting me without arguments.

You are a COWARD, you can not face me, you are also afraid of my proofs or facts.

POOR COWARD CHESSMANSKEPTIC, Another loser.

Thanks,
S&S

AGAIN CHESSMANSKEPTIC:

You need this twice: YOU ARE A COWARD.

At leat Purple Tentacle is decent enough to face his points or whatever in the thread of my case.

YOU can not , because you are COWARD.You are hiding here and insulted me with no reasons or arguments.

Thanks,
S&S

P.S.
You can now go to my thread and insult if you want, but you always be a COWARD.

And again: You are COWARD

 

[Foodbunny]

Re: Re: ANOTHER COWARD

And again: You are COWARD

Yes, insults have much more impact when in CAPITAL LETTERS.

 

[Guest]

Re: Re: Re: ANOTHER COWARD

Yes, insults have much more impact when in CAPITAL LETTERS.

Hi Foodbunny:

But you "look" so NICE and SWEET . Congratulations.

The capitals letters in your case is a "piropo". Is an spanish word, sorry I don't know the word in english. I hope it causes the same impact on you.

Thanks,

S&S