fromdownunder
Philosopher
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2006
- Messages
- 6,721
Michel, do you think that you could develop a test for telepathy that was falsifiable? Would you as a scientist be able to accept the result of that test even if it contradicted your current belief?
I already suggested a possible test earlier in this thread, which could be played around with a little which would, I think, satisfy both sides of the fence. Michel refused to even comment on it (or missed my post), even though it only included his beloved numbers 1 - 4.
If you simply want to stick to the numbers 1 - 4, here is another option. Find somebody you trust not to attempt to fudge the answers.
You go into one room with a RNG, and generate a number between 1 and 4, write it down, and mentally project this number to your trusted friend for 60 seconds. After sixty seconds, he writes the number down.
Repeat 50 times, then compare answers. See what % of hits you get with exact correlation on both your lists. The whole thing will take less than an hour, and you probably need one other person in each room to ensure that there is no cheating, or hidden communication devices.
Let us know the result.
You could cut it to 30 minutes by projecting the number for 30 seconds instead of 60. I think half an hour rather than spending days/weeks posting on a forum where every third person lives in a different time zone would be far more productive. Especially when no less that three tests have failed to give evidence of anything at all.
Dan, or Michel, would either of you care to comment on this proposed protocol, or improve on it, or give reasons why it is not valid?
Norm