Merged New telepathy test: which number did I write ?

[Daylightstar]

All information exists in this "information realm", including that of elves. All ideas and all imagination is already in existence and are only chosen and used.
...

Which is what you believe but do not know.

...
Your claim of "no actual paranormal activity...." is the common claim of all skeptics. No amount of experimentation is going to be adequate.
...

^{Hilite by Daylightstar}Why not quote the full senetence:
"No actual paranormal activity has ever been actually demonstrated to actually have occurred."

...
You can see from personal /subjective experience that the paranormal is real. If you have ever been loved by another human being, you will know that the experience is there even in the absence of the person loving you, even when they are thousands of miles away.
...

Personal/subjective experience of the way the world actually works is useless. It creates belief, not data.

...
If you have had children you will feel the connection even in their absence. If you leave them with a baby sitter and something is wrong, you will know it before any one tries to ring you. In fact most mothers or father who sense their child is distressed will make the call before any baby sitter even feels for their phone.

See above.

 

[Daylightstar]

We use the word "know" when we have strong evidence. In fact, all of scientific theories are beliefs. We believe based on evidence. When we find evidence that contradicts the belief we abandon it.

You may have strong belief causing agent and disposition, but no data to demonstrate the existence of telepathy.

You just believe it.

 

[Daylightstar]

If we consider that he is genuine and he might be, I don't exclude that, ...

You can safely exclude that on account of lack of reality of telepathy and presentation of the subject.

 

[Donn]

Your conclusion is the same as Einstein's except that he used a left and right hand glove for his example. This was disproved as I pointed out in experiments later done. Entanglement is a reality.

The point I make is that if there is a non-physical reality where there is information and no time and no space. If this is the case then it also provides the grounding by which the paranormal may be explained.

The iron fist in the red right handed glove, when following the left foot rule, will indicate the fragrance of protrusion — this makes as much sense as your quoted post.

(Please start your own thread and stop haunting this sad one.)

 

[kyrani99]

Go on then, produce some evidence. Heaps will do.

Unless it's heaps of ****.

It is too much to put on here but I am making a video to explain it and when I have finished it I can post the link if you are interested.

 

[fagin]

No thank you. Youtube is not evidence.
Try just a little heap, any tiny pile will do.

 

[kyrani99]

What you did say earlier was:

You believe that your idea covers the One True Cause of Disease.

I said "uncovers the true causes of disease". There are many causes. Telepathy is NOT A CAUSE. it is involved where there is abuse of relationship and the mental entanglement involved to make mental suggestions to some related individual. And that is true whether we are talking about mental disorder or physical disease. They all involve a nocebo effect.

 

[Daylightstar]

I said "uncovers the true causes of disease". There are many causes. Telepathy is NOT A CAUSE. it is involved where there is abuse of relationship and the mental entanglement involved to make mental suggestions to some related individual. And that is true whether we are talking about mental disorder or physical disease. They all involve a nocebo effect.

Ehm, I already showed what exactly you posted and my response to that.

Please keep your One True Cause for Disease quackery out of this thread.
You brought it in, it appears that that is what you are about, please stop hijacking this thread with this revolting crap.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

... I think I can reasonably speculate that Mitchell's interest in parapsychology might be somehow related to the simple fact he happened to have a name resembling mine.

No, you can't reasonably speculate that, any more than I could speculate that since 'apple' and 'antelope' both start with 'a' then an antelope is a type of fruit.

 

[Michel H]

I would like now the give the results of this latest test:

...
Hi, I invite you to participate in a new telepathy test.

At about 7:30 p.m. on this Monday June 20 (Brussels, Belgium time), I wrote carefully (partly or completely) one of the four texts below on my sheet of paper, and I surrounded it with a rough ellipse. Then, I wrote it again twice (partly only).
...
I shall repeat this text (which was chosen using a random number generator) from time to time during this test (partly or completely).

I ask you to tell me which text I wrote (if you think you know it, even with a doubt). You may also answer "I don't know".

...

Thank you for participating.

About one day after I started this test, ComfySlippers said:

You're asking people to guess from one to four.
Same as you always do.

Nothing new. No change. ...

I then replied to him:

In this thread, I actually wrote a (simplified) text on my paper, not a number. I also repeat the simplified text from time to time, with help from the "voices".

About 50 minutes later, ComfySlippers wrote:

...

4!

I accept this answer as meaning "my fourth text", in spite of some lack of clarity (I have found that it is better to display some flexibility in the analyses of these tests; I have to try to adapt to what people are willing to say or do).
The text I had actually written and surrounded with an ellipse was:

...
Text 4:
Would it not have been better ... in that country?
...

So (because no one else, other than CS gave an answer in this test), the hit rate is equal to 100% in this test, with just one answer given.

But this is not yet all. Two days ago (and about 10 days after the beginning of this test), fayette said

I think 4

in my latest "Telepathy test: which number did I write?" thread on the forum spiritualforums.com (see http://www.spiritualforums.com/vb/showpost.php?p=1452644&postcount=32 ), that I have already mentioned on this forum.

Displaying the usual required flexibility (and not complaining too much about the fact an almost correct answer was given on the wrong forum), I accept this answer too (with some reservations; by the way, I didn't notice anybody giving another answer recently in any other forum where I have done a telepathy test before), and, in this way, I get two correct answers, with a hit rate still equal to 100%.

So, the results of this test, while they are far from perfect, once again seem to support the statement that "I broadcast my thoughts to the whole world":

Speak for yourself.

I hear voices like Michael.

...

Such beliefs are typically associated with schizophrenia, but, here, we seem to be dealing with a different of phenomenon, related to extra-sensory perception.

 

[abaddon]

I would like now the give the results of this latest test:

About one day after I started this test, ComfySlippers said:

I then replied to him:

About 50 minutes later, ComfySlippers wrote:

I accept this answer as meaning "my fourth text", in spite of some lack of clarity (I have found that it is better to display some flexibility in the analyses of these tests; I have to try to adapt to what people are willing to say or do).
The text I had actually written and surrounded with an ellipse was:

So (because no one else, other than CS gave an answer in this test), the hit rate is equal to 100% in this test, with just one answer given.

But this is not yet all. Two days ago (and about 10 days after the beginning of this test), fayette said

in my latest "Telepathy test: which number did I write?" thread on the forum spiritualforums.com (see http://www.spiritualforums.com/vb/showpost.php?p=1452644&postcount=32 ), that I have already mentioned on this forum.

Displaying the usual required flexibility (and not complaining too much about the fact an almost correct answer was given on the wrong forum), I accept this answer too (with some reservations; by the way, I didn't notice anybody giving another answer recently in any other forum where I have done a telepathy test before), and, in this way, I get two correct answers, with a hit rate still equal to 100%.

So, the results of this test, while they are far from perfect, once again seem to support the statement that "I broadcast my thoughts to the whole world":

Such beliefs are typically associated with schizophrenia, but, here, we seem to be dealing with a different of phenomenon, related to extra-sensory perception.

No, you are trying to build a statistical case out of a sample of one. Surely you know this is utter nonsense.

Secondly, you have selected the response of a banned member who cannot respond to you nonsense. That is intentional on your part.

Thirdly, your interpretion of CS referring to your "fourth text" is specious at best and dishonest at worst.

Fourthly, your "flexibility" is simply an excuse to attempt to bend any result at all into agreement with your nonsensical claim.

Fifthly, the post you link is post #32 in that thread. If one examines the whole thread (link) the "correct" answer was "1" and you provided it in post #20. Post #32 was 23 days after you revealed the correct answer and "4" wasn't even the "correct" answer. How do you expect anyone to accept this crap?

 

[Donn]

Same old same. Round and round the mulberry bush.

 

[cullennz]

I would like now the give the results of this latest test:

About one day after I started this test, ComfySlippers said:

I then replied to him:

About 50 minutes later, ComfySlippers wrote:

I accept this answer as meaning "my fourth text", in spite of some lack of clarity (I have found that it is better to display some flexibility in the analyses of these tests; I have to try to adapt to what people are willing to say or do).
The text I had actually written and surrounded with an ellipse was:

So (because no one else, other than CS gave an answer in this test), the hit rate is equal to 100% in this test, with just one answer given.

But this is not yet all. Two days ago (and about 10 days after the beginning of this test), fayette said

in my latest "Telepathy test: which number did I write?" thread on the forum spiritualforums.com (see http://www.spiritualforums.com/vb/showpost.php?p=1452644&postcount=32 ), that I have already mentioned on this forum.

Displaying the usual required flexibility (and not complaining too much about the fact an almost correct answer was given on the wrong forum), I accept this answer too (with some reservations; by the way, I didn't notice anybody giving another answer recently in any other forum where I have done a telepathy test before), and, in this way, I get two correct answers, with a hit rate still equal to 100%.

So, the results of this test, while they are far from perfect, once again seem to support the statement that "I broadcast my thoughts to the whole world":

Such beliefs are typically associated with schizophrenia, but, here, we seem to be dealing with a different of phenomenon, related to extra-sensory perception.

Every four people will say four.

How about you post the wrong ones

No, you are trying to build a statistical case out of a sample of one. Surely you know this is utter nonsense.

Secondly, you have selected the response of a banned member who cannot respond to you nonsense. That is intentional on your part.

Thirdly, your interpretion of CS referring to your "fourth text" is specious at best and dishonest at worst.

Fourthly, your "flexibility" is simply an excuse to attempt to bend any result at all into agreement with your nonsensical claim.

Fifthly, the post you link is post #32 in that thread. If one examines the whole thread (link) the "correct" answer was "1" and you provided it in post #20. Post #32 was 23 days after you revealed the correct answer and "4" wasn't even the "correct" answer. How do you expect anyone to accept this crap?

 

[Michel H]

... the post you link is post #32 in that thread. If one examines the whole thread (link) the "correct" answer was "1" and you provided it in post #20. Post #32 was 23 days after you revealed the correct answer and "4" wasn't even the "correct" answer. How do you expect anyone to accept this crap?

"1" was indeed the correct answer for the "old" test, the one I started on May 5 on Spiritual Forums. On June 20, I started a new test on this forum, whose target was roughly 4 (though it was actually a fourth text), I wrote my fourth text on my paper, and surrounded with an ellipse. Then, I repeated the text (and also the message "4th text") on June 21, June 22, June 23, ... until today (included). On June 30 - "miracle"! - somebody (fayette) said "I think 4" on Spiritual Forums and, with some flexibility, I accept it as an answer to the test that was current when fayette answered.

 

[Michel H]

Every four people will say four.

How about you post the wrong ones

In this test, nobody answered "1", nobody answered "2", and nobody answered "3", everybody (two people) answered 4, which was roughly the correct answer.

 

[cullennz]

In this test, nobody answered "1", nobody answered "2", and nobody answered "3", everybody (two people) answered 4, which was roughly the correct answer.

Roughly?

Did you not think the number is just comfy?

Couple two kids

 

[Michel H]

Roughly?

...

I wrote "roughly" because, ideally, to answer correctly, a participant in this test should have said: "I think you wrote the fourth text: "Would it not have been better ... in that country" " (or something like that), because, in this test, the target was actually one of four texts, and not just a number.

 

[Nay_Sayer]

I wrote "roughly" because, ideally, to answer correctly, a participant in this test should have said: "I think you wrote the fourth text: "Would it not have been better ... in that country" " (or something like that), because, in this test, the target was actually one of four texts, and not just a number.

I'm feeling generous, I'm lifting my shun on this thread.

Does it really matter Michel? Everyone,Yourself included knows you are just going to create a new test at some point and disregard everything before it.

 

[cullennz]

Please please. Can the next one include puppies

 

[Jack by the hedge]

I was once on a submarine and I can report that I was unable to hear Michel's thoughts.



Of course I cannot hear Michel's thoughts at any other time either so I suppose that doesn't prove much except perhaps that being in a submarine does not suddenly give me the ability to hear Michel's thoughts.



Hope that helps. Not what Michel wants to hear perhaps, but true nonetheless.