Ron Swanson
Illuminator
Still Playing!! 
Merged New telepathy test: which number did I write ?
- Thread starter Michel H
- Start date
-
- Tags
- telepathy telepathy test
- Status
Daylightstar
Philosopher
I would like to give now the results of this latest test on this forum:
I do not find kyrani's answer credible, so her incorrect answer is in line with the general observation that non-credible answers tend to be incorrect in my telepathy tests. An example of a credible answer is:
It won't take very long, because only one person answered one of the four numbers "1", "2", "3", "4". This member is kyrani99 (ty again, kyrani), who replied:
She had said before:
Unfortunately, the number I had written was a "1", and not a "3" (incidentally, this number was chosen by a random number generator, like in most of my telepathy tests, it was not decided by myself).
I do not find kyrani's answer credible, so her incorrect answer is in line with the general observation that non-credible answers tend to be incorrect in my telepathy tests. An example of a credible answer is:
ComfySlippers
Banned
See you in a few months time then.
Daylightstar
Philosopher
kyrani99 appears to be a True Cause Of Ilness quack wannabee, there's lots of lack of credibility there. In your case it would be better to arrange a consult with your real doctor and discuss returning to medication.
Really, it's better for you.
New telepathy test: which text did I write?
Warning: the texts below (unfortunately) contain references to some violent events.
Hi, I invite you to participate in a new telepathy test.
At about 7:30 p.m. on this Monday June 20 (Brussels, Belgium time), I wrote carefully (partly or completely) one of the four texts below on my sheet of paper, and I surrounded it with a rough ellipse. Then, I wrote it again twice (partly only).
Text 1:
Taliban leader Mullah Mansour was killed by an US airstrike which destroyed his car on May 21, 2016 in Pakistan (near the border with Afghanistan). The strike had been authorized by President Obama.
Text 2:
David Gilkey, an American journalist, was killed in southern Afghanistan, in a Taliban ambush, on June 5, 2016 (about two weeks later). The last foreign journalists to be killed in Afghanistan lost their lives in 2014.
Text 3:
On June 12, 2016, a mass shooting occurred in a nightclub in Orlando, Florida. Fifty people died, including the gunman, Omar Mateen, who was killed by Orlando police. Mateen's parents are Afghan, his father said the attack was in support of the Afghan Taliban.
Text 4:
Would it not have been better to try to negotiate with the Taliban the creation of some kind of Taliban or Islamic State (with limited democracy, Sharia law for Muslims, but freedom of movement for local populations and religious freedom for non-Muslims) in the South of Afghanistan, to try to end the long war in that country?
I shall repeat this text (which was chosen using a random number generator) from time to time during this test (partly or completely).
I ask you to tell me which text I wrote (if you think you know it, even with a doubt). You may also answer "I don't know".
Comments are welcome, but not indispensable; you may explain, for example, how confident you are in your answer.
Feel free to point out any error or lack of clarity.
Thank you for participating.
Warning: the texts below (unfortunately) contain references to some violent events.
Hi, I invite you to participate in a new telepathy test.
At about 7:30 p.m. on this Monday June 20 (Brussels, Belgium time), I wrote carefully (partly or completely) one of the four texts below on my sheet of paper, and I surrounded it with a rough ellipse. Then, I wrote it again twice (partly only).
Text 1:
Taliban leader Mullah Mansour was killed by an US airstrike which destroyed his car on May 21, 2016 in Pakistan (near the border with Afghanistan). The strike had been authorized by President Obama.
Text 2:
David Gilkey, an American journalist, was killed in southern Afghanistan, in a Taliban ambush, on June 5, 2016 (about two weeks later). The last foreign journalists to be killed in Afghanistan lost their lives in 2014.
Text 3:
On June 12, 2016, a mass shooting occurred in a nightclub in Orlando, Florida. Fifty people died, including the gunman, Omar Mateen, who was killed by Orlando police. Mateen's parents are Afghan, his father said the attack was in support of the Afghan Taliban.
Text 4:
Would it not have been better to try to negotiate with the Taliban the creation of some kind of Taliban or Islamic State (with limited democracy, Sharia law for Muslims, but freedom of movement for local populations and religious freedom for non-Muslims) in the South of Afghanistan, to try to end the long war in that country?
I shall repeat this text (which was chosen using a random number generator) from time to time during this test (partly or completely).
I ask you to tell me which text I wrote (if you think you know it, even with a doubt). You may also answer "I don't know".
Comments are welcome, but not indispensable; you may explain, for example, how confident you are in your answer.
Feel free to point out any error or lack of clarity.
Thank you for participating.
John Jones
Penultimate Amazing
Not this **** again!
Daylightstar
Philosopher
Daylightstar
Philosopher
Merge requested as it is the same as the already existing guess a number thread.
Daylightstar
Philosopher
Thank you
Last edited:
Couldn't we have a mod box requiring Michel to use this existing thread for all claims about telepathy, and for any tests he might feel like running, without starting a new thread every time? Maybe a little incentive for him to actually stop this silly behaviour might work.
I don't know what exactly your motivation is for requesting such a move, MikeG (do you perhaps have in mind people who may have subscribed to this thread, or put it on "ignore" ...), but I don't think this would be a desirable thing to do.
When people who are not familiar with my work see this thread for the first time, I think it is better they don't have to dig through it to try to find out where the hell the opening post of the current discussion is, which may be very different from the opening post of the whole thread.
Last edited:
abaddon
Penultimate Amazing
It isn't different. It's exactly the same as all of your previous attempts. It will fail in exctly the same way as all your previous attempts because you are not telepathic. Nobody is.
fagin
Philosopher
Mmmmm, but I knew you were going to say that.
Or, that someone would, at least.
Or, that someone would, at least.
Daylightstar
Philosopher
If they are not familiar with your body of 'work', running into it in this very same thread makes it very easy for them to see what your body of 'work' is all about.
As abaddon noted, all your stuff is exactly the same.
I'd be inclined to support a modbox after a merge of any newly created thread with same or similar content with the current thread
ComfySlippers
Banned
You're asking people to guess from one to four.
Same as you always do.
Nothing new. No change. You're not telepathic. No one is.
When new members click on this "physical" thread for the first time, what they see on page 1 is the opening post of an old thread from about 3 years ago, which was of the "blinded kind", and therefore substantially different from this one (in addition to the fact that the target was a number, not a text). This means that I was supposed to assign credibilities without being aware of the numerical answer given by the member. I no longer consider this method to be optimal, because it is too complicated.If they are not familiar with your body of 'work', running into it in this very same thread makes it very easy for them to see what your body of 'work' is all about.
As abaddon noted, all your stuff is exactly the same.
I'd be inclined to support a modbox after a merge of any newly created thread with same or similar content with the current thread
If you really want to merge threads, it would perhaps make a little more sense to merge also my first number-guessing thread: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=241593 , (which was not of the blinded kind) and put it at the beginning of this long thread.
But I think by far the best approach is to keep threads unmerged and independent. In this way, people can immediately see the current opening post, and, if they are curious about the number of tests Michel H has already done on this forum for example, they can easily click on my name, View Profile, Statistics, Threads, and they quickly see the answer (and good luck with the current system to find the answer to this simple question).
In this thread, I actually wrote a (simplified) text on my paper, not a number. I also repeat the simplified text from time to time, with help from the "voices".
abaddon
Penultimate Amazing
Nope. Nobody knew what your game was until you exposed your game after a few attempts. Then everyone recognised it for the game it is and thereafter your threads got merged and will continue to get merged. Every single one is the same. Every single one fails. Over and over and over.
It always ends up in the same place.
You end up claiming that I and everyone else here really does hear your thoughts, but for unexplained reasons, we are all part of some conspiracy to deny that we do so. Somehow, you cannot express why that might even be remotely possible. Or desireable. Or remotely useful to anyone, bar you as an artificial crutch to your strange belief which you invented out of whole cloth.
This conspiracy you propose requires that everyone is in on it. Except you.
This is rather odd. Somehow, 7 billion people are paid to reject one single Belgian chap. By some member/s of that actual seven billion. And you cannot present any reason for that beyond they are amusing themselves.
Does this not give you at least some pause for thought?
DuvalHMFIC
Graduate Poster
Any new porn to see here?
- Status