New PFT 3D animation depicts actual FDR values

[Pardalis]

The problem is when Lyte's delusions start to affect real people, with real names that actually have value and meaning.

Maybe some day these real people, with real names will catch up with Craig Ranke. He can hide in fantasy land for so long.

 

[uk_dave]

And you see nothing illogical here?

Aren't the same people who planted that FDR the same people who "staged" the physical damage?

Nope. Two different departments.

The FDR guys use Linux and drink Grolsch.

The Faked Debris guys are using Windows 95 and drink shandy.

Big difference.

Unfortunately, after the incident with the fried egg and the scuba diving suit, the two departments had a policy of non co-operation. We had thought this had ended after the Great Purge of 1997, but the FDR guys still complained about their dental coverage compared to the Fake Debris guys Lube allowance.

Big Owl was going to bang some heads together prior to 9/11 but he was called away for an emergency free feather fluffing in fresno and the pentagon plans for the faked debris weren't reconciled with the fdr plans and everyone went home early anyway coz some bloody arab terrorists went and flew a bloody great plane into the building before the false flag could be initiated.

 

[Lyte Trip]

Anyway.....

I don't have time to argue with you folks today.

I just thought you would be interested in this accurate information that points out the fatal anomalies in the fraudulent FDR.

Cheers!

 

[nicepants]

Anyway.....

I don't have time to argue with you folks today.

I just thought you would be interested in this accurate information that points out the fatal anomalies in the fraudulent FDR.

Cheers!

if you believe the FDR data was faked, how can you use said faked data to support your theory?.....since it was faked. Wouldn't that kind of be like using The Onion as a source?

 

[uk_dave]

Wouldn't that kind of be like using The Onion as a source?

You say that as if they wouldn't!

 

[VespaGuy]

I'm still waiting for the rest of the animation of the fly-over Lyte. You know that animation in your avatar? Why not show us the rest of that? What happens after the explosion? What did it look like from other angles?

How come you haven't done that, yet?

 

[lapman]

I just thought you would be interested in this accurate information that points out the fatal anomalies in the fraudulent FDR.

Oh, I am very interested. Let me know when you are going to actually post some accurate information.

 

[uk_dave]

I'm still waiting for the rest of the animation of the fly-over Lyte. You know that animation in your avatar? Why not show us the rest of that? What happens after the explosion? What did it look like from other angles?

How come you haven't done that, yet?

Hey! Get in line!

Researchers Edition (or Pentacon Re-cut as we refer to it down our way) first, then you can play with your avatars.

 

[stateofgrace]

Anyway.....

I don't have time to argue with you folks today.

I just thought you would be interested in this accurate information that points out the fatal anomalies in the fraudulent FDR.

Cheers!

Yes I can imagine what a busy and active social life you must lead Ltye. You must be so busy hooking up with the authorities and sharing all your evidence with them, which authorities was it you have got in touch with by the way?

 

[Lyte Trip]

Wait, am i understanding you correctly?

Everyone who saw it strike the building are all wrong because it doesn't fit in to your fantasy that it flew over the building, which no one saw.

Amazing.

Ok I'll address this before I go.

Very few people were in a position to physically see the impact as demonstrated by TAM.

But many people were fooled.

Just because they believed it hit does not mean they weren't deceived.

Sleight of hand deceptions can be very convincing.

Just ask James Randi.

We have evidence that proves it was a sleight of hand deception.

You have provided zero evidence to counter this.

I suggest you all take the challenge that was proposed at LCF in
this thread.


Oh and will one of you please explain to your fellow member, Enigma (TxGuy) what a straw man argument & ad hominem attacks are?

He clearly needs some help with this from his critical thinking buddies.

Have a great day!

 

[mortimer]

Yes I can imagine what a busy and active social life you must lead Ltye. You must be so busy hooking up with the authorities and sharing all your evidence with them, which authorities was it you have got in touch with by the way?

Damn that was smooth. Think he'll fall for it?

 

[CHF]

People were fooled.

Just because they believe it hit does not mean they weren't deceived.

Sleight of hand deceptions can be very convincing.

Yes, it's easy for dosens of witnesses to confuse a plane flying over a building with a plane flying into a building.

In fact, I don't know how anyone could possibly tell them apart.

Remember Air France flight 538 that crashed in Toronto back in 2005? Well when I first saw that burning wreckage on the news the first thing I thought was "thank God he pulled up in time!"

 

[Par]

Ok I'll address this before I go.

Very few people were in a position to physically see the impact as demonstrated by TAM.

But many people were fooled.

Just because they believed it hit does not mean they weren't deceived.

Sleight of hand deceptions can be very convincing.

Just ask James Randi.

We have evidence that proves it was a sleight of hand deception.

You have provided zero evidence to counter this.

In other words, "Everyone who saw it strike the building are all wrong because it doesn't fit into my fantasy that it flew over the building, which no one saw."

 

[stateofgrace]

Damn that was smooth. Think he'll fall for it?

I doubt it, he's probably too busy.

 

[uk_dave]

This is where it gets really funny.....

Ok I'll address this before I go.

It's ok you can go now.

Very few people were in a position to physically see the impact as demonstrated by TAM.

And the conspirators must have planned it this way, down to the individual trees which would screen the impact from the 105 people whose accounts are published.....

But many people were fooled.

...and the conspirators must have known that all these people would be fooled, even down to knowing with 100% certainty that no one would be taking a snap of the Pentagon that morning, or might not be distracted by the fireball.

Just because they believed it hit does not mean they weren't deceived.

And the conspirators must have known that each and every one of the published witness statements would conclude that the plane hit the building and that not a single witness would come forward, either from the 105 published accounts or from the hundreds of others who were in the vicinity on that day, to say that they saw a flyover or anything else which was at odds with the official account.

Sleight of hand deceptions can be very convincing.

Yep, provided that your audience is carefully placed and controlled and SMALL

Just ask James Randi.

Who?

We have evidence that proves it was a sleight of hand deception.

No you don't

You have provided zero evidence to counter this.

Yes we have

Have a great day!

Oh I will and I am, because I'm not burdened by the knowledge that a democratically elected government conspired to kill 3000 of it's own citizens and then colluded with the media, opposition political parties and professional bodies to cover up the crime. You must have trouble functioning on a daily basis with the weight of that knowledge bearing down on you.

ta tah!

 

[Hyperviolet]

Ok I'll address this before I go.

Very few people were in a position to physically see the impact as demonstrated by TAM.

But many people were fooled.

Just because they believed it hit does not mean they weren't deceived.

Sleight of hand deceptions can be very convincing.

Just ask James Randi.

We have evidence that proves it was a sleight of hand deception.

You have provided zero evidence to counter this.

I suggest you all take the challenge that was proposed at LCF in
this thread.


Oh and will one of you please explain to your fellow member, Enigma (TxGuy) what a straw man argument & ad hominem attacks are?

He clearly needs some help with this from his critical thinking buddies.

Have a great day!

Well, i have to admit im impressed with your persistance that all the evidence that refutes you is wrong and faked. That takes a special breed of ignoramus.

Lyte, one day you'll wake up and realise that your premise is absolutely ridiculous. The all powerful NWO decide not to simply crash a jet, instead opting to simulate a perfectly timed explosion on the building to coincide at the exact time of the would be impact. In an attempt to fool everyone (even those from angles who wouldnt see the impact). Meanwhile NWO operatives are scrambling about faking lamp posts, DNA, plane parts.... whilst the dimwitted public turn a blind eye to it all. The all powerful NWO decide that to top off the plan they've been hatching for many a year, they decide to plant a FDR that refutes all their hard work. Incredibily, their plan works so well that many people do see the plane strike the building and none see the big massive f-off jumbo jet searing over the building, not even people looking from the opposite end of the crash.
All because they thought crashing a jet might be err..too expensive or something.

Impressive and efficient! Its amazing how all these 16 year olds on youtube found em out, eh?

 

[WilliamSeger]

The problem is when Lyte's delusions start to affect real people, with real names that actually have value and meaning.

Maybe some day these real people, with real names will catch up with Craig Ranke. He can hide in fantasy land for so long.

That reminds me: The other day on 911researcher.com (a hot spot of "no-planer" "TV fakery" idiocy), someone posted the phone number, address, and email of the person who shot one of the videos showing Flight 175 hitting WTC2, then encouraged everyone to contact him to ask why he was participating in this "video fakery." (And there wasn't even an apology from the people on that site who claimed this person never existed.)

These crackpots are not entirely harmless.

 

[Diazo]

Alright.

Rather then repeating the same stuff again, here's two previous threads that already cover this pretty extensively.

For the flight data recorder:
AA77 FDR Data, Explained

And for the witnesses seeing a different flight path:
Flyover Witnesses

 

[Gamolon]

The FDR is irreconcilable with the physical damage.

Clearly the plane did not fly where the FDR says it did because it does not match the physical damage.

Therefore the only conclusion is that the FDR is faked.

Of course this is 100% supported by the witnesses who place the plane far from the physical damage AND the FDR.

So wait a second...

Let me get this straight.

You are saying that the FDR is faked based on the fact that it doesn't match FAKED (by your account) physical evidence?!

That is just....well....incredible.

 

[boloboffin]