New PFT 3D animation depicts actual FDR values

[Par]

Yes I agree that was a terminally daft question asked by Mortimer.

I see you’re being hopelessly puerile already. Your statement was ridiculous, Mortimer’s question was not

 

[beachnut]

the puking gun, quick call the police

The FDR is irreconcilable with the physical damage.

Clearly the plane did not fly where the FDR says it did because it does not match the physical damage.

Therefore the only conclusion is that the FDR is faked.

Of course this is 100% supported by the witnesses who place the plane far from the physical damage AND the FDR.

Lyte, the FDR does not tell anyone where the plane is. The position data from the plane puts the aircraft south of CITGO. You use the heading with the DME of 1.5 from DCA and you get a position over 3000 feet from the Pentagon at 273 feet above the ground, and it matches the pressure altitude at that point. Bad for you since north of the CITGO station no terrain matches the Radar Altimeter of 273 feet with the pressure altitude recorded. Proof your north flight path, a manuver 77 could not fly due to g force, never happened.

The standard navigation data on the FDR had the plane 1000 or 2000 feet off of its final position. You and JDX need to ignore JREF and sell your lies. Your lies and JDX junk is too easy to show in error. Since your own witnesses saw 77 hit the light post, you and JDX are proven wrong with your witnesses. One stop shopping for lies at the Pentacon.

Oh, the FDR is faked. Then why are there over 24 hours of this flight and previous flights which match 77 flights. Gee, the day before flight is on the FDR, and it goes back 24 hours to other flight flown by this very plane, and that data matches what the plane had done. WRONG again. Why do you lie so much. Tell the rest of the story. The FDR has the exact flights of 77, over 24 hours of data from multiple flights. Proves you last statement is false. At least you are always making up lies. Poor JDX does not have the capability to use his brain and figure out 9/11, or is he just trying to sell misinformation for 15.99?

 

[T.A.M.]

Well I am going to go home and create a flight simulation based on the sekrit data released to me by a USG insider. It shows conclusively that the plane flew south of citgo, hit the light poles, and then the pentagon.

And no, like Robbie, I am not telling you my source, and I am not releasing the data to anyone else...you'll have to take my word for it.

TAM (Agent 1-2-D-B)

 

[Lyte Trip]

Lyte;

the next time your guys suspect an oncoming false flag operation, please remind me to tell my handlers to make sure the FAKE FDR data matches the alleged path of the plane, and corresponds to the damage...see the stupid, moronic NWO who pulled off 9/11 were to dumb to put the corresponding data in the last time, and this resulted in investigooglers finding out...we can't have this happen again.

TAM (agent 1-2-D-B)

Why did they screw up the animation so bad?

You admit that was a screw up right? Did you tell your "handlers" about that?

Well they screwed up the FDR too.

Do you really think I used google to conduct the interviews presented in The PentaCon?




Oh; I wanted to thank you for proving Gravy a fraud.

 

[Lyte Trip]

The FDR data is 100% consistent with the physical damage. That is beyond question, in my mind.

Asserting it over and over doesn't make it true.


You better get "debunking" because this new animation demonstrates how you use nothing but confusion, distractions, and lies in a desperate attempt to cast doubt and sew confusion.

 

[Anti-sophist]

Why did they screw up the animation so bad?

They made a single tiny mistake that anyone could make. Especially since it was just a working copy of the animation.

There was nothing bad, at all, about it.

You admit that was a screw up right? Did you tell your "handlers" about that?

I've spent months trying to get -you- people to admit they screwed up the animation.. because you guys have been using the 'appeal to animation' fallacy for months.

I'm glad what I was saying 6 month ago has finally sunk in.

Well they screwed up the FDR too.

And yet you cannot find a SINGLE example of this that hasn't been thoroughly demolished repeatedly on this forum.

All you -can- do is repeat it, over and over. Over and over. Argument ad nausem and proof by overwhelming gibberish.

 

[T.A.M.]

lol...

of course. They messed up the FDR data so that it proved the plane didnt hit the pentagon. OMG...do you really believe-- wait, why am I asking, I know you believe that...

I cannot wait for the day when you are embarrassed to tears for your ridiculousness...and Robbie too.

TAM

 

[Anti-sophist]

You better get "debunking" because this new animation demonstrates how you use nothing but confusion, distractions, and lies in a desperate attempt to cast doubt and sew confusion.

New information? What new information? The same tripe you guys have had debunked dozens of times already?

I'm not asserting -anything- over and over. I, and others, have already debunked -every-single- contention pft has. Every. Single. One. Repeatedly.

What do you do? Keep on repeating. Over and over.

 

[beachnut]

get some facts Lyte, please, there are no facts at all in any of this mess

Asserting it over and over doesn't make it true.


You better get "debunking" because this new animation demonstrates how you use nothing but confusion, distractions, and lies in a desperate attempt to cast doubt and sew confusion.

Irony

 

[Par]

You admit that was a screw up right? Did you tell your "handlers" about that?

Oh yes. They’re absolutely furious. What are you lying about now?

 

[Totovader]

So the FDR had to be faked because you claim it is inconsistent with the physical damage.

Yet you then turn around and claim that the physical damage is faked.

And your witness who contradict the physical damage are... absolutely correct up until the point that they say that the plane crashed into the Pentagon.

This is absolutely ridiculous. At this point it's just funny to watch you try and tie connections and then quickly untie them because you realize the contradictions.

 

[GlennB]

You are incorrect.

The fact that the FDR was faked is evidence that the plane did not really hit the building and the physical damage was therefore simulated as well.

This happens to be supported by all the eyewitnesses and refuted by none.

Terrance Kean, 35, who lives in a 14-story building nearby, heard the loud jet engines and glanced out his window.
"I saw this very, very large passenger jet," said the architect, who had been packing for a move. "It just plowed right into the side of the Pentagon.

 

[T.A.M.]

Robbie hasnt had any professional, known to be a professional FDR expert , commit their names to this has he? Do we have a name and address to see of the EXPERT who translated the data that resulted in this animation so I can send it to our NWO masters?

TAM

 

[lapman]

Lyte. Did you personally interview the FDR to make sure that it was actually south of CITGO? Did the FDR see your eyewitnesses? Can your eyewitnesses positively confirm that the FDR is not the FDR? Or is the evidence that the FDR data is fake is the fact that the FDR data is fake?

 

[Par]

The fact that the FDR was faked is evidence that the plane did not really hit the building and the physical damage was therefore simulated as well. This happens to be supported by all the eyewitnesses and refuted by none.

I see, that’s what he’s lying about now. He’s claiming that the number of witnesses who testified to the ridiculous “fly-over” is not zero, but rather “all of them.”

 

[Alareth]

Just so I understand correctly, this is another attempt to use the data from the FDR that was FOUND IN THE WRECKAGE AT THE PENATGON to somehow prove there was no plane at the Pentagon?

 

[T.A.M.]

yes, apparently our organization, after planning and carrying out 9/11, made the mistake of planting FAKE FDR data in the FDR found at the pentagon, and the stupid moronic evil all knowing superpowerful cabal in an act of retarded mental insanity, planted data that actual shows NO PLANE HIT THE PENTAGON!!!

doh...dumb NWO.

TAM

 

[Par]

Just so I understand correctly, this is another attempt to use the data from the FDR that was FOUND IN THE WRECKAGE AT THE PENATGON to somehow prove there was no plane at the Pentagon?

I think his argument really is just as stupid and facile as this:

• The animation doesn’t match the physical damage.
• Therefore, the flight data recorder has been faked.
• Therefore, the plane didn’t hit the Pentagon.

 

[T.A.M.]

my asscrack doesnt match the damage, so OBVIOUSLY the plane didnt hit the pentagon.

lol...sorry...in a particularly irritated mood today.

TAM

 

[LashL]

So, Lyte's newest "theory" is that the FDR is fake because it doesn't match the physical damage. By definition, this requires Lyte to believe that the physical damage is legitimate. Yet, Lyte also contends that the physical damage was faked.

So, the FDR is fake because it doesn't match up with "faked" physical damage? This is rubber room material.