• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

New Member

Gravy said:
My point, as I stated above, is so what if it is an explosion? There were many explosions after each of the 9/11 collapses. What's your point, scooby?
Click to expand...

My point was that the accusation that someone on the CT side has faked this is unfounded and unproven and therefore unfair.
 
scooby said:
Yeah he's the Steve Irwin of 911 Truth really isn't he?

He's a bit commercial, and he is like a circus barker, but at the end of the day he's a good source of information and he seems genuine. He does tend to interrupt his guests a bit too much - likes the sound of his own voice.
Click to expand...
Stundied!
 
tonicblue said:
Yes, I like they way Wildcat states it as absolute fact without any expert analysis of the video.:)
Click to expand...
It is an absolute fact. A hobby of mine is recording live performances of bands - with their permission of course. That noise was a source of frustration back before I had high-quality mics and high-quality wind screens and taping an outdoor show on a windy day. It's a noise I am all too familiar with, and I guarantee you what you hear on that video is wind noise.

But hey, I'm just a shameless shill, right?
 
tonicblue said:
The explosion video is not faked either. I would like to get an audio expert to look at them both, but don't know any.
Click to expand...

No need.

A true skeptic must begin from a position of uncertainty.
We do not know whether the video is genuine or false.
Having nothing to indicate that the video is false, the only safe assumption to make is that it is genuine.

Misplaced onus again - I see a lot of this.
Here, they can have it back, until they come up with an audio analysis - its genuine.
 
scooby, the more I think about your Alex Jones comment, the more I am amazed, and I just have to ask:

What would you consider to be a poor source of information?

and

Is Alex Jones' repeated blaming of the FDNY ("guilty of AT LEAST manslaughter") for "pulling" WTC 7 justified?
 
Gravy said:
My point, as I stated above, is so what if it is an explosion? There were many explosions after each of the 9/11 collapses. What's your point, scooby?
Click to expand...

That after several pages of successful shillery - bordering on the "World Trade Center 7 Denial" we recently saw - we finally arrive at the question raised by the video...

How does the US Govt explain that explosion at the World Trade Centre?

Discuss.
 
scooby said:
That after several pages of successful shillery - bordering on the "World Trade Center 7 Denial" we recently saw - we finally arrive at the question raised by the video...

How does the US Govt explain that explosion at the World Trade Centre?

Discuss.
Click to expand...
What explosion?

BTW, have you ever used the name "Smallguy01" on another forum?
 
scooby said:
The ScrewLooser's - who'd give a **** enough to start a website if they didn't believe in it?

Where's ScrewBigfoot?
Click to expand...

You know scooby, if you are really into Farm Videos that much, I am sure you can find them without our help.
 
scooby said:
How does the US Govt explain that explosion at the World Trade Centre?

Discuss.
Click to expand...


There's nothing much to discuss, the loud noise could be anything.

The government has alot of things to do than explain a noise in a video.
 
scooby said:
That after several pages of successful shillery - bordering on the "World Trade Center 7 Denial" we recently saw - we finally arrive at the question raised by the video...

How does the US Govt explain that explosion at the World Trade Centre?

Discuss.
Click to expand...

A better question would be how to the Policemen and Firemen who were there explain it?
 
Gravy said:
scooby, the more I think about your Alex Jones comment, the more I am amazed, and I just have to ask:

What would you consider to be a poor source of information?

and

Is Alex Jones' repeated blaming of the FDNY ("guilty of AT LEAST manslaughter") for "pulling" WTC 7 justified?
Click to expand...

I thought nobody died in wtc7.
 
It's a useless discussion anyway, Scooby wants everything to be explained by "the government", whatever he means by that, and even if somehow someone in the gorvernment explained it, he wouldn't accept it because he already made up his mind.
 
How long before Lisa posts that "Scooby has been banned as a sock of pdoherty etc."?

I give him a few days at best, but no doubt he's already registered the next sock here. He so desperately wants to be part of the JREF...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom