• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

New BF photo

Camera: Sony Cybershot
Exposure: 0.001 sec (1/800)
Aperture: f/10
Focal Length: 24 mm
ISO Speed: 100
Resolution: 72 dpi
Date and Time: 2005:11:17 14:37:11

1280x960 seems a bit small for a 5 MP camera and it's not easy to get a clear zoom on the image
 
Last edited:
The photographer is claiming that the subject was hairy. That ought to mean something in the real world. The "naked human visual system" (our own eyes) can often resolve things that a camera cannot and vice-versa. A subject could be hairy and seen as such, but a camera image suggests something else (a non-hairy subject).

Just like with the "Baby Bigfoot Video", we have a situation where a photographer (still image or video) captures something and voluntarily decides to submit the evidence to a "Bigfoot research organization". The question still remains (as with the "baby Bigfoot" video)... if a person captures something on camera that they are uncertain of... why is the reactionary response one that compels the person to seek out the examinations of the subculture of Bigfootery?

As far as we know, the photographer has not presented these images to any other entity other than a "Bigfoot research organization". That ought to mean something in the real world. It suggests to me that the photographer already understands the concept of Bigfoot and possibly understands the thinking and behavior of the subculture of Bigfootery.

I'm reminded of the expression, "When you are in Montana and hear hoofbeats... think horses, not zebras." But, Bigfootery obviously is based on an unconventional epistemology. It suggests that hoofbeats in Montana are very possibly zebra hoofbeats. "We (the token experts of Bigfoot) are very happy to go-to-bat for you to support the (likely) possibility that the hoofbeats you heard in Montana really were zebras."

Is this the kind of thing that should be expected to happen when there truly is a wild gigantic undiscovered bipedal ape living in America; or is this what should be expected when a myth is not recognized as such... or what?
 
It's a snowboarder, resting on his heels (backside of board), looking down.
 
Let's ask Why would a bigfoot climb a mountian? It's cold, windy, and not the best use of energy. I would think, if they are real, they would migrate, hibernate, or at least stay out of the cold by keeping in forested areas. Doesn't look like food is up there, either.
 
My strong suspicion is that the photographer is a hoaxer. They have recognized that the BFRO (and Bigfootery in general) is willing to entertain that these images might depict a Bigfoot... because they are all in the same boat as being entities that are willing to think that Bigfoot is a real animal that might be caught on film or have its footprints plaster-casted.
 
Starthinker said:
Let's ask Why would a bigfoot climb a mountian? It's cold, windy, and not the best use of energy. I would think, if they are real, they would migrate, hibernate, or at least stay out of the cold by keeping in forested areas. Doesn't look like food is up there, either.
Click to expand...

1) "Avalanche Starting" is a favorite game among Yeti.

2) He heard loud music and didn't want to miss the party.

3) He heard that FOX news was shooting in the area.

4) His pet mammoth had run away.

5) He was following his wife's directions.

6) It's a gang initiation thing.

7) He was on a shamanic journey and humans are his totem animal.

8) It's time to put the Christmas decorations out.

9) He had to go outside for a smoke.

10) To get to the other side.
 
Of course there is food up the mountain. Bigfoot's diet consists of camera crews and irrefutable evidence.
 
Nah...

Baby bigfeet are phanton cats... Can't you scoffics see the Invisble Phanton Cat near mommy bigfoot? Can't you see her hairy breasts?
 
The most important question is how did they get bigfoot up the mountain? I for one find it hard to believe hundreds of slaves towed it up there using a ramp. I find the theory that it flew up there attached to a kite much more...

oh sorry...wrong thread
 
Odin said:
The most important question is how did they get bigfoot up the mountain? I for one find it hard to believe hundreds of slaves towed it up there using a ramp. I find the theory that it flew up there attached to a kite much more...

oh sorry...wrong thread
Click to expand...

:D
 
Starthinker said:
Let's ask Why would a bigfoot climb a mountian? It's cold, windy, and not the best use of energy. I would think, if they are real, they would migrate, hibernate, or at least stay out of the cold by keeping in forested areas. Doesn't look like food is up there, either.
Click to expand...

That question has already been asked in a thread over on the Bigfoot Think Tank. One poster suggested that Bigfoot was up on this snowy crest because it was escaping the throbbing humanity that exists below the mountain top. Nevermind that there is no food up there. This undescribed ape is not looking for food. It is sauntering through the snow for other reasons. Bigfootery is generally a subculture of folks who are way beyond the question of Bigfoot as a real animal (if they ever entertained that question in the first place)... these folks have moved their arguments past that and into the banter about what Bigfoot nests look like and how they defend their offspring by scaring us with screams, breaking trees apart and pitching boulders in our direction. The Bigfooters habitually shift the burden of proof upon skeptics. Nevermind the question of whether Bigfoot is a myth... try proving that an 800 pound ape was not the source of that pumpkin-sized rock that came flying out of the shrubbery aimed directly at the innocent hiker. Did we mention that this hiker is a "credible" individual who would never lie, hoax or misinterpret anything?

Oh, did I mention that Bigfootery contains "credible" accounts of Bigfoot taking material human possessions? That means that BF could steal a snowboard. Can any skeptic prove that BF could not take a snowboard and have some fun on a mountainside? They are sneaky and intelligent apes, so they have probably already observed human snowboarders from behind big trees. Pity the poor skeptic and his inability to prove that Bigfoot is not a thief and an imitator. Pity the poor skeptic that knows so little about the hidden (yet still photographable) natural world.

All hail Bigfoot!
 
Of course its Bigfoot,Ive seen enough blurry distant black blobs to know! Bunch of cynics,you are.;)

That camera exposure listed higher seems a bit odd.
 
Note how the snow appears to have numerous footprints, and even some lines as might be made by skis or snowboards. Most visible in the picture Tricky posted. Either the hilltop is hosting a bigfoot party, or it's not isolated from humanity.

Looks like a coat collar to me between the shoulder and head on the left side.
 
Odin said:
The most important question is how did they get bigfoot up the mountain? I for one find it hard to believe hundreds of slaves towed it up there using a ramp. I find the theory that it flew up there attached to a kite much more...

oh sorry...wrong thread
Click to expand...
What the hell are you on about?
Show me one historical precedent of a bigfoot being flown up a mountain on a kite.
The ancient Washingtonians had no such technology.
It's patently obvious that they had to use ramps.
Lots os ramps.
Spiral ramps.
Ones that went round and round the mountain.
The valley below is actually the excavation quarry for the stones they used to make the ramps.
There are ancient carvings buried 5000ft under the snow that show the ancient Washingtonians, being shown by something that could (in a certain light, under the influence of narcotics and only one one day a year) possibly be said to maybe be an alien or supernatural being, how to raise a sasquatchian like being up a mountain using ramps.
The mountain, incidentally, shows signs of sand storm damage, proving that the whole area must have been a desert in the year 10,500BC.
Also, if you squint your eyes really closely, you'll see that the three mountains of that formation also line up exactly with Orion's belt, proving that sasquatches must have had contact with a lost tribe of astronomer priests from Atlantis who taught them who to position mountains to resemble astronomical phenomena and also how to hide real good too.
 
She said hairy breasts.{Funny type of laugter}Any photos?

That one photo though is of a big foot that's been spotted in texas and D.C.
How the the hell does it get around so fast?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom