Need help with evidence of Official Claim

[gumboot]

I have been looking online for a list of actual evidence to prove the official version of 911. All I can find are goofy things like a passport from one of the hijackers found in the rubble of WTC and Atta's suit-cases left behind holding his will and plans for the attack. I'm looking for the real evidence that supports what we were told. Isn't there a list of those who helped the 19 hijackers and a list of evidence showing how they helped the hijackers pull it off, and how they were punished. Or was it just Osama and 19 dudes? Any help would be great. Thanks.

It would seem to me that there MUST BE some great list of evidence that is sooooo obvious that makes all these secondary possibilities (conspiracy theories) so laughable and not necessary to discuss.

Can anyone help me?

Hi there Kooger, welcome to the forums.

I might be able to help. As you can imagine, 9/11 is an enormous topic. Perhaps we can bring clarity to this discussion. I am happy to provide you with evidence of what happened that day. Please indicate which specific aspect of the attacks you'd like to discuss first. Once you have presented what it is specifically about this one aspect that concerns you, I am confident I can address your concerns.

Regards,
Gumboot

 

[I Am He]

Maybe someone here can clear something up for me? When the illustrious Demolition Expert from Pa. stated that they could of used suitcases full of explosives to bring down WTC7, wouldn't the big CD Co's. use that method in their work?? And, in my estimate, would save them scads of money to boot. It seems to me if the Demolition Expert from Pa. professes to know so much more then them, maybe he could show them how it's done ?? Thus making a killing for himself at the same time. Just asking questions you know. he he

Or better yet, maybe our expert from Pa. could explain how it is done himself. That's if he hasn't put his tail between his legs and ran back home to mama.

 

[Lisa Simpson]

The rest of this thread has been moved to AAH.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Lisa Simpson

 

[Par]

Your questions make sense to you based on what you know. But not to me when I've seen plenty of pictures showing buildings fallen over to the side, intacked. I'm sure you've seen the same pics. There are plenty. I have not seen pictures of buildings that have fallen that are composed entirerly of ash and steal.

Are the buildings in those photographs the same size, type and composition as World Trade Center 7? Did they all collapse due to debris damage followed by extensive fires? Even if the answer was yes (which it isn't), what those photographs would show is that such buildings can slump over but retain their general form. They wouldn’t show that all such buildings should necessarily do so.

(Incidentally, World Trade Center 7 wasn’t “composed entirerly of ash and steal.”)

Not being cocky, just haven't seen them. I actually haven't seen a single picture of a building that has fallen from someting other than explosives, which looks anything like the remains of building 7. Not saying a space beam did the job, just can't find simular evidence of modern buildings falling like that.

Well, ask yourself this: Other than due to a controlled demolition, how many buildings that are similar to World Trade Center 7 have you seen collapse? If the answer’s none, how do you know what to compare it with?

 

[T.A.M.]

"Can't find evidence of modern buildings falling like WTC7 did from anything other than via explosives"

Well, find me a 47 storey skyscraper that had a 10-20 storey chunk taken out of one side, was reported by firefighters to be substantially leaning to one side, and was allowed to burn unchecked for hours, AND DID NOT COLLAPSE, and then we'll have something to talk about.

TAM

 

[fuelair]

YAre you a woowoo in disguise?

That should not be a question - he clearly is.

 

[Vincent Vega]

Bldg 7

Building 7. If you watch 9 or 10 videos of what a controlled demolition looks like, you can't with a straight face say that building 7 doesn't at least look like a controlled demolition. And I'm tired of people telling me that it doesn't look like one AT ALL. Of course it does. So if it does look like a CD, and I'm told it's not, I just want to know what really happened. And if five years later, noone can tell me how it happened, I guess I'm just supposed to say oh well.

Fair enough

Paruse this "cocky-a-hole" and let us know what you think. It goes a long way to explaining why WTC 7 collapsed like it did.

NIST Building 7

 

[Par]

(a) Where we find fires, we find fire engines.

(b) Fire engines cause fire.

That’s more like ignoring a common cause than affirming the consequent. It’s a nice enough example though!

 

[firecoins]

...nonsense,
I could carry a suitcase into a building and desroy a very large area...and again, wires would not be needed...the controlled demos you are keeping in your head, you have to use yor imagination and think outside of that scenario...conventional explosives were not used, nor conventional demo tecniques...
..as far as supporting theories with no evidence or proof goes, I have yet to see proof there was 19 (or whatever the number is now) hijackers on the aircraft...I wasn't on any of them (or at the baording gates to watch them get on) so I don't know for sure...
...it boils down to what you want to believe...fabricated evidence fom one source or the other...and you yourself have to look at what evidence is still availabe (pics mostly for me anyhow) and decide for yourself...
...to buy the 'official story'...that is quite a stretch for the 'rational' thinker in my opinion...

WRONG!!!! In 1993 a truck bomb was exploded in the basement of the WTC. No building collpased. Sorry.

There is actual evidence of 19 hijackers. These were real people who were documented moving around the country and world. Passanger and airline employees phoned in using GTE airphones to the airlines on recorded phone lines describing events as they happaned.

Thats 2x in 1 post your wrong.

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

Man... I had a feeling this thread would get resurrected after it was linked to in another thread...