Pondering the correlations present between bigfoot and boqs of the Kwakiutl, I decided to produce a simple comparison.
Simpler, by which you mean, "Ignoring all the physical descriptions that are awkward to my position".
Let's reiterate them,
He is a man. Who lives in a house. Who also speaks the language of men. (Boa)
The Pantheon article backs up the thought of him being a man by refering to him as being a particular personage.
He is invisible.
Has millions of mouths.
Can transform into birds.
[none of] Franz Boas' accounts ...describes him as a giant.
One I missed previously He uses native transport - a canoe.
http://www.canadiana.org/cgi-bin/pimg/b5c84520cf465ee6/0700/14288/0012.gif]Another oneUses fire to cook food.
Bigfoot: Physical description: large, bipedal, apeman
Location: (historically) PNW
Mystery: no accepted evidence, sightings, myths
Boqs: Physical description: giant,
I disagree. First hand accounts by Franz Boas does not mention a giant.
humanoid (as denoted by 'cannibalism')
No. First hand accounts by Franz Boas says
man, not man-like or humanoid, but
specifically, a man.
Location: PNW
Mystery: associated with Secret society (man-eater)
No mystery. The entity IS associated with a secret dance society that has been witnessed and described first hand by an anthropologist Franz Boas (and others).
As far as the million mouths, I seriously doubt the Kwakiutl had a word for million. And that puts the other added characterists in doubt.
From Boas' first hand accounts of their customs, they most certainly had a word for thousand (ie coppers were used as "IOU"s in exchanges of large numbers of items. He quotes numbers in the multiple thousand.)
It is more probably that someone described the Canibal spirit to Boas with having "a thousand, thousand mouths", than your unattributed doubt is accurate.
Is there a better candidate?
I'm not putting forward candidates, merely assessing the one you put forward.
In Summary:
Baxbaxwalanuksiwe:
Kwakatiutl call him a man, not a giant (first hand account (Boas))
can transform into birds
many mouths
lives in a house
uses a canoe
has a wife
has servants
speaks (a language that Kwakatiutl understand)
uses fire to cook food
a man-eater, described as cannibal, therefore, a man.
possibly invisible (Boas doesn't mention it in first hand accounts)
Man:
man sized
can not transform into birds
one mouth
lives in a house
uses a canoe
has a wife
has servants
speaks
uses fire to cook food
if a man-eater is a cannibal
visible
BF:
larger than a man
can not transform into birds
one mouth
doesn't build dwellings
doesn't build transport
no evidence of wedding ceremonies, therefore a mate, not a wife
no evidence of servants (human or otherwise)
does no use fire to cook food
does not speak, utters animal grunts.
I am not aware of any man-eating habits. If so, ever described as cannibalism?
visible (by your own account)
So what's the total of similar characteristics to BF?
Man: 9
BF : 1 (visibility).
I for one find the evidence to support your belief that this Cannibal Spirit is a Kwakatuitl description of bigfoot lacking severly when compared to the non-BF alternative.