• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

NASA Engineer (ret.) is a Twoofie?

Maybe Mr. Deets is taking as "holes" the doors labeled here as "Single door" and "Roll-up Door":

http://www.historycommons.org/events-images/a679_pentagon_overview_2050081722-17901.jpg

Here's another view:

http://i941.photobucket.com/albums/ad257/snow__crash/aedrive_debris.jpg

Or maybe he can explain what are the other holes made by the airplane.

ETA: More relevant pics here: [nfurl]stevenwarran.blogspot.com/2008/02/pinch-paisley-pentagon-worker-goes-on.html[/nfurl]

No, the rescue workers blasted the holes to get in. (From the A-E Drive)

Cripes, Mr. Deets has failed to look at the photo posted IN THIS THREAD showing that it was a roll up door.

Unbelievable.

Thank Babs for further misleading you Dwain. You gonna do any of your own research, champ?
 
No, the rescue workers blasted the holes to get in. (From the A-E Drive)

And the poor survivor who was waiting to be rescued on the other side of the wall was blown to bits by the hole "blasted" in the wall to rescue him.

And people wonder why so much derision is heaped on this ridiculous and absurd Pilots for 9/11 "Truth" club.

And people wonder why nobody takes a word of what you say or Balsamo or any of the other fools seriously, regardless of your "credentials".

Have you ever been in the Pentagon, Mr. Deets? Have you ever walked the corridors and worked in the offices and strolled the A-E drive? Have you ever taken note of the myriad doors and entrances and access ways from the A-E drive into the offices and hallways of the main C-ring? It is very, very apparent you have not and as such are just making up this crap.

"...the rescue workers blasted the holes to get in...." is a dozen different ways of stupid.
 
Last edited:
“If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about answers.”
-Thomas Pynchon's

:cool:
 
No, the rescue workers blasted the holes to get in. (From the A-E Drive)

How dirt dumb does being a desk jockey at NASA make one, these days??? :boggled:

I count 3 doors & about 28 windows (on the 1st floor).

And you claim that rescue workers are going to find a demolitions expert to set up & blow a hole in a wall quicker than they can find a janitor with a key..?? Or a stone or crowbar to break a window...??
 
I've changed my view on this one:

I now am of the opinion the hole was blasted from the inside out. Refer to "The Pentagon Exit Hole" by Russell Pickering. (http://www.rense.com/general70/hole.htm)
From your link:
If any part of an aircraft survived after traveling through the 24 inch thick steel reinforced, Kevlar mesh "E ring façade, blast resistant windows, all of the interior walls, pillars and office contents of 3 rings of the Pentagon, then why didn't it show itself in the A-E drive? And how did it break such a clean hole and then decelerate in the space of 30 feet so as not to even chip the opposing "B" ring wall?

Care to explain what the hell he's talking about (considering you're now basing your opinion on this)?

Your digging yourself a deeper hole.
 
I've changed my view on this one:

I now am of the opinion the hole was blasted from the inside out. Refer to "The Pentagon Exit Hole" by Russell Pickering. (http://www.rense.com/general70/hole.htm)

From the article "There isn't a straight line between the facade and the hole."

Jesus, I mean I don't even know where to start, that is literally second grade type of hog wash.

By the way, does anyone want to break it to Dwain that he has picked another person (Pickering) who thinks that CIT are a pack of frauds?

Unbelievable. Mr. Deets theory on the Pentagon is so contradictory that he ought to quit shoveling, and call it a day.
 
Agreed. I stand corrected.

After further consideration, I retract this statement.

I've indicated the column identifiers on this aerial view. Column numbers and letters are shown in a layout in Fig. 7.9 of the Building Performance Study report. The columns on either side of the middle opening where most of the smoke is coming out are 5O and 7O of Wedge 1 (The "O" stands for the letter designating the row of columns forming the external wall between C RING and the AE Drive). There isn't any opening built into the wall between those two columns, therefore, the hole had to have been caused in some other manner.
 

Attachments

After further consideration, I retract this statement.

I've indicated the column identifiers on this aerial view. Column numbers and letters are shown in a layout in Fig. 7.9 of the Building Performance Study report. The columns on either side of the middle opening where most of the smoke is coming out are 5O and 7O of Wedge 1 (The "O" stands for the letter designating the row of columns forming the external wall between C RING and the AE Drive). There isn't any opening built into the wall between those two columns, therefore, the hole had to have been caused in some other manner.

You finally got something right, and then you backtrack. I would think that with your experience and knowledge, you would be writing a paper using science and math to break open this case, not parroting crap from truther websites.
 
The columns on either side of the middle opening where most of the smoke is coming out are 5O and 7O of Wedge 1 (The "O" stands for the letter designating the row of columns forming the external wall between C RING and the AE Drive). There isn't any opening built into the wall between those two columns, therefore, the hole had to have been caused in some other manner.

I've downloaded your pdf, and I'm looking at the opening between columns 50 and 70. It's so obviously a doorway that I can't fathom how anyone could possibly mistake it for anything else. It's got sharply defined vertical sides, and a sharply defined horizontal top. What exactly is your reason for believing that there was no such doorway?

Dave
 
I've downloaded your pdf, and I'm looking at the opening between columns 50 and 70. It's so obviously a doorway that I can't fathom how anyone could possibly mistake it for anything else. It's got sharply defined vertical sides, and a sharply defined horizontal top. What exactly is your reason for believing that there was no such doorway?

Dave

Lol, you can see the framing.
 
After further consideration, I retract this statement.

I've indicated the column identifiers on this aerial view. Column numbers and letters are shown in a layout in Fig. 7.9 of the Building Performance Study report. The columns on either side of the middle opening where most of the smoke is coming out are 5O and 7O of Wedge 1 (The "O" stands for the letter designating the row of columns forming the external wall between C RING and the AE Drive). There isn't any opening built into the wall between those two columns, therefore, the hole had to have been caused in some other manner.

You have been shown pictures that clearly show a fully framed roll up style door, you can even seen the damaged tracks for the door hardware. The fact that you have retracted your agreement demonstrates without any fear of contradiction that you are either a troll or completely incompetent.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom