• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

My argument against materialism

Pure Argent or whoever you really are; I don't care about your ranting in post #2023. I simply asked for references on the physics issue in question. The rest is baloney.
 
kenkoskinen said:
Pure Argent or whoever you really are; I don't care about your ranting in post #2023. I simply asked for references on the physics issue in question. The rest is baloney.
Click to expand...

So you would prefer to continue strawmanning than to admit that there was a simple failure of communication?

Sad.
 
dafydd said:
Why should they want to reach you? I've seen your site.
Click to expand...

I haven't seen your site! Mine has contact information and lots of people like it. Just because you don't, so what? Even you can't please everyone. Why not post some references on the so-called Global Electromagnetic Repulsion? Or work on your site that will please everyone? Okay ... I'm out of specific suggestions ... but why not try doing something constructive ... like (one more came to mind) building a time machine to retrieve your lost minutes?
 
Pure Argent said:
So you would prefer to continue strawmanning than to admit that there was a simple failure of communication?

Sad.
Click to expand...

I think we have communicated our failure to communicate. It's that you don't care about physics and I don't care about your language.

It's not so sad. "you can't please everyone, so you've got to please yourself!"
 
kenkoskinen said:
I think we have communicated our failure to communicate.
Click to expand...

Apparently not, because you think

kenkoskinen said:
It's that you don't care about physics and I don't care about your language.
Click to expand...

when it is quite obviously not.

Let me say it again, and listen to me this time:

Your entire argument, with myself, PixyMisa, and others, stems from a choice of words on your part. Your rants about GEMFR or whatever you call it are pointless, because no one is arguing for that. You simply misunderstood what was being said.
 
Pure Argent said:
Apparently not, because you think



when it is quite obviously not.

Let me say it again, and listen to me this time:

Your entire argument, with myself, PixyMisa, and others, stems from a choice of words on your part. Your rants about GEMFR or whatever you call it are pointless, because no one is arguing for that. You simply misunderstood what was being said.
Click to expand...

Oh well, all I asked for are references on the physics issue we were discussing. That's the pool you jumped into. The rest is bunk.
 
Pure Argent said:
YOU
ARE
ASKING
FOR
REFERENCES
FOR
SOMETHING
NO
ONE
IS
ARGUING
FORi
Click to expand...

Go back and read the posts. Pixy Misa and I were disagreeing about the physics. You jumped into that pool. Your comment was in context to the discussion. I simply asked for references on the subject in question. Have you been drinking or something?
 
kenkoskinen said:
Go back and read the posts. Pixy Misa and I were disagreeing about the physics. You jumped into that pool. Your comment was in context to the discussion. I simply asked for references on the subject in question. Have you been drinking or something?
Click to expand...

No, I haven't. However, I do have a question for you: is English your first language?

Seriously. This isn't an insult; I think we've hit the language barrier here.
 
kenkoskinen said:
I haven't seen your site! Mine has contact information and lots of people like it. Just because you don't, so what? Even you can't please everyone. Why not post some references on the so-called Global Electromagnetic Repulsion? Or work on your site that will please everyone? Okay ... I'm out of specific suggestions ... but why not try doing something constructive ... like (one more came to mind) building a time machine to retrieve your lost minutes?
Click to expand...

I don't have a crank site.
 
punshhh said:
Pixy, how many times do I need to remind you of the unknown unknowns.
Click to expand...
Like what? Give me a good historical example.

Oh and the actual universe which it appears materialism doesn't concern itself with. As materialism consists of theories in the mind of man, it is presumably viewed through rose tinted glasses.
Click to expand...
Why would you presume such a thing?
 
Pure Argent said:
No, I haven't. However, I do have a question for you: is English your first language?

Seriously. This isn't an insult; I think we've hit the language barrier here.
Click to expand...

Pure Argent, please read the posts. And ... yes ... we don't have much in common and ... yes ... we've (you and I) have failed to communicate.
 
kenkoskinen said:
If there is any support for GEMFR then cite the references from the mainstream physics community. Your arguments are bunk!
Click to expand...
kenkoskinen, what force is it that you think makes water incompressible?

What force is it that you think binds the atoms in water molecules together?

What force is it that you think generates the phenomenon known as surface tension?

And what force is it that you think counteracts gravity and prevents planets from collapsing under their own weight?

(And just by guessing at random you can be expected to get one of those right.)
 
kenkoskinen said:
Does that mean you have a crankless one? If you've created anything ,,, is it online? Have you created anything that is off-line? If so what?
Click to expand...

I have my own music channel on Youtube. I'd be interested in your answers to the above questions. You seem to be doing your best to avoid them.
 
PixyMisa said:
kenkoskinen, what force is it that you think makes water incompressible?

What force is it that you think binds the atoms in water molecules together?

What force is it that you think generates the phenomenon known as surface tension?
Click to expand...

You are playing.

And what force is it that you think counteracts gravity and prevents planets from collapsing under their own weight?

(And just by guessing at random you can be expected to get one of those right.)
Click to expand...

I'm merely asking for references on what I've dubbed (for lack of any commonly used term) global electromagnetic theory resistance (GEMTR). What is so difficult about that? I can't find anything. This post doesn't add anything to the discussion. Until I see your references ... you're wasting your time.
 
dafydd said:
I have my own music channel on Youtube. I'd be interested in your answers to the above questions. You seem to be doing your best to avoid them.
Click to expand...

Okay ... what is the link to the music channel that pleases everyone?

As per Pixy Misa's questions. There isn't anything to gain by giving obvious answers. We've been on the merry go round on this, long enough. All I want is her references. I'll comment after I get them.
 
kenkoskinen said:
You are playing.
Click to expand...
No I'm not. I'm completely serious. Answer the questions. If you have a decent grasp of general physics, they should be pretty simple.

I may (as you say) be wasting my time, but I still somehow feel obliged to try to steer you onto the right path. So here we go:

What force is it that you think makes water incompressible?

What force is it that you think binds the atoms in water molecules together?

What force is it that you think generates the phenomenon known as surface tension?

And what force is it that you think counteracts gravity and prevents planets from collapsing under their own weight?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom